mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 6

Question 50

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A legacy data export must use encryption keys held outside AWS KMS and independently managed. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing
  2. Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies
  3. Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy
  4. Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement. Client-side encryption can preserve direct control of plaintext and key lifecycle outside KMS.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing can be valid when A sensitive S3 bucket should use customer-controlled key permissions and usage auditing, it targets a different technical condition. SSE-KMS integrates object encryption with key-policy control and KMS API logging.

B:

Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies would address a different requirement: A multi-Region application needs matching cryptographic key identities and interoperable ciphertext across Regions. Related multi-Region keys share key material and key identifiers for cross-Region cryptographic operations.

C:

This alternative, Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy, is appropriate when Data encrypted with a customer managed KMS key must remain decryptable after an employee leaves the team. KMS access is evaluated against key and IAM policies, not tied to an employee's existence.

Question 51

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A production database password must rotate automatically and be delivered to applications without storing it in source code. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy
  2. Issue certificates from AWS Private Certificate Authority and manage trust distribution
  3. Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions
  4. Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy. Secrets Manager supports managed secret versions and rotation workflows.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A team needs private certificates for internal service-to-service TLS identities, Issue certificates from AWS Private Certificate Authority and manage trust distribution could be useful. A private CA provides organization-controlled certificate issuance and lifecycle.

C:

Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions solves the related scenario A Lambda function currently includes a plaintext API token in an environment variable; secret retrieval at runtime avoids directly embedding long-lived credentials in code or configuration.

D:

Although Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB can be valid when A public TLS certificate for an Application Load Balancer should renew without custom scripts, it targets a different technical condition. ACM can automate renewal for supported integrated services and DNS validation.

Question 52

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A public TLS certificate for an Application Load Balancer should renew without custom scripts. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB
  2. Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions
  3. Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy
  4. Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB. ACM can automate renewal for supported integrated services and DNS validation.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions solves the related scenario A Lambda function currently includes a plaintext API token in an environment variable; secret retrieval at runtime avoids directly embedding long-lived credentials in code or configuration.

C:

Although Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy can be valid when A production database password must rotate automatically and be delivered to applications without storing it in source code, it targets a different technical condition. Secrets Manager supports managed secret versions and rotation workflows.

D:

Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity would address a different requirement: An EKS workload needs short-lived AWS API credentials without mounting a shared node IAM access key. Per-pod role credentials reduce broad node credentials and static key exposure.

Question 53

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A team needs private certificates for internal service-to-service TLS identities. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB
  2. Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity
  3. Issue certificates from AWS Private Certificate Authority and manage trust distribution
  4. Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Issue certificates from AWS Private Certificate Authority and manage trust distribution. A private CA provides organization-controlled certificate issuance and lifecycle.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB solves the related scenario A public TLS certificate for an Application Load Balancer should renew without custom scripts; aCM can automate renewal for supported integrated services and DNS validation.

B:

Although Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity can be valid when An EKS workload needs short-lived AWS API credentials without mounting a shared node IAM access key, it targets a different technical condition. Per-pod role credentials reduce broad node credentials and static key exposure.

D:

This alternative, Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions, is appropriate when A Lambda function currently includes a plaintext API token in an environment variable. Secret retrieval at runtime avoids directly embedding long-lived credentials in code or configuration.

Question 54

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: An EKS workload needs short-lived AWS API credentials without mounting a shared node IAM access key. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity
  2. Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB
  3. Issue certificates from AWS Private Certificate Authority and manage trust distribution
  4. Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity. Per-pod role credentials reduce broad node credentials and static key exposure.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB would address a different requirement: A public TLS certificate for an Application Load Balancer should renew without custom scripts. ACM can automate renewal for supported integrated services and DNS validation.

C:

This alternative, Issue certificates from AWS Private Certificate Authority and manage trust distribution, is appropriate when A team needs private certificates for internal service-to-service TLS identities. A private CA provides organization-controlled certificate issuance and lifecycle.

D:

For the separate situation A production database password must rotate automatically and be delivered to applications without storing it in source code, Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy could be useful. Secrets Manager supports managed secret versions and rotation workflows.

Question 55

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A Lambda function currently includes a plaintext API token in an environment variable. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity
  2. Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions
  3. Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy
  4. Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Move the secret to Secrets Manager and restrict function-role retrieval permissions. Secret retrieval at runtime avoids directly embedding long-lived credentials in code or configuration.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use a supported pod-specific IAM role mechanism such as EKS Pod Identity would address a different requirement: An EKS workload needs short-lived AWS API credentials without mounting a shared node IAM access key. Per-pod role credentials reduce broad node credentials and static key exposure.

C:

For the separate situation A production database password must rotate automatically and be delivered to applications without storing it in source code, Store it in AWS Secrets Manager and configure a supported rotation strategy could be useful. Secrets Manager supports managed secret versions and rotation workflows.

D:

Use a supported AWS Certificate Manager-issued public certificate with the ALB solves the related scenario A public TLS certificate for an Application Load Balancer should renew without custom scripts; aCM can automate renewal for supported integrated services and DNS validation.

Question 56

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: Security must prevent a workload account from launching resources in prohibited AWS Regions. What should the architect implement?

  1. Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions
  2. Aggregate compatible findings in AWS Security Hub with cross-Region settings as appropriate
  3. Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally
  4. Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions. SCPs centrally constrain maximum allowed account permissions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Aggregate compatible findings in AWS Security Hub with cross-Region settings as appropriate solves the related scenario A security team needs a consolidated posture and finding view from multiple AWS security products; security Hub normalizes and correlates findings from integrated security services.

C:

Although Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally can be valid when An organization wants to continuously identify publicly exposed S3 buckets without periodic manual audits, it targets a different technical condition. Config rules evaluate resource configuration against policies and emit noncompliance states.

D:

Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management would address a different requirement: Multiple accounts need a consolidated view of GuardDuty findings without signing in individually. Delegated GuardDuty administration centralizes threat findings across enrolled accounts.

Question 57

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: An organization wants to continuously identify publicly exposed S3 buckets without periodic manual audits. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions
  2. Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management
  3. Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally
  4. Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally. Config rules evaluate resource configuration against policies and emit noncompliance states.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions solves the related scenario Security must prevent a workload account from launching resources in prohibited AWS Regions; sCPs centrally constrain maximum allowed account permissions.

B:

Although Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management can be valid when Multiple accounts need a consolidated view of GuardDuty findings without signing in individually, it targets a different technical condition. Delegated GuardDuty administration centralizes threat findings across enrolled accounts.

D:

This alternative, Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings, is appropriate when An auditor needs to know which external principals can access KMS keys and IAM roles. Access Analyzer models resource-policy trust and reports potentially unintended outside access.

Question 58

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: Multiple accounts need a consolidated view of GuardDuty findings without signing in individually. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Aggregate compatible findings in AWS Security Hub with cross-Region settings as appropriate
  2. Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings
  3. Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions
  4. Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management. Delegated GuardDuty administration centralizes threat findings across enrolled accounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Aggregate compatible findings in AWS Security Hub with cross-Region settings as appropriate can be valid when A security team needs a consolidated posture and finding view from multiple AWS security products, it targets a different technical condition. Security Hub normalizes and correlates findings from integrated security services.

B:

Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings would address a different requirement: An auditor needs to know which external principals can access KMS keys and IAM roles. Access Analyzer models resource-policy trust and reports potentially unintended outside access.

C:

This alternative, Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions, is appropriate when Security must prevent a workload account from launching resources in prohibited AWS Regions. SCPs centrally constrain maximum allowed account permissions.

Question 59

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A security team needs a consolidated posture and finding view from multiple AWS security products. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings
  2. Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally
  3. Aggregate compatible findings in AWS Security Hub with cross-Region settings as appropriate
  4. Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Aggregate compatible findings in AWS Security Hub with cross-Region settings as appropriate. Security Hub normalizes and correlates findings from integrated security services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings would address a different requirement: An auditor needs to know which external principals can access KMS keys and IAM roles. Access Analyzer models resource-policy trust and reports potentially unintended outside access.

B:

This alternative, Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally, is appropriate when An organization wants to continuously identify publicly exposed S3 buckets without periodic manual audits. Config rules evaluate resource configuration against policies and emit noncompliance states.

D:

Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management solves the related scenario Multiple accounts need a consolidated view of GuardDuty findings without signing in individually; delegated GuardDuty administration centralizes threat findings across enrolled accounts.

Question 60

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: An auditor needs to know which external principals can access KMS keys and IAM roles. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions
  2. Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings
  3. Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally
  4. Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings. Access Analyzer models resource-policy trust and reports potentially unintended outside access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions, is appropriate when Security must prevent a workload account from launching resources in prohibited AWS Regions. SCPs centrally constrain maximum allowed account permissions.

C:

Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally solves the related scenario An organization wants to continuously identify publicly exposed S3 buckets without periodic manual audits; config rules evaluate resource configuration against policies and emit noncompliance states.

D:

Although Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management can be valid when Multiple accounts need a consolidated view of GuardDuty findings without signing in individually, it targets a different technical condition. Delegated GuardDuty administration centralizes threat findings across enrolled accounts.