mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 5

Question 40

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: An external vendor must assume a role without allowing confused-deputy access. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition
  2. Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required
  3. Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole
  4. Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition. The external ID binds role assumption to the intended customer relationship.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required solves the related scenario A service running on EC2 needs to access an S3 bucket in another account; cross-account access must satisfy both principal authorization and resource-side trust or policy.

C:

Although Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole can be valid when An auditing application in a security account must list resources in member accounts without long-lived keys, it targets a different technical condition. Temporary role sessions avoid distributing persistent credentials across accounts.

D:

Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls would address a different requirement: An assumed role's policy allows an action but the member account SCP explicitly denies it. SCP denies form a permissions ceiling that IAM allows cannot override.

Question 41

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: Workforce users must sign in with an existing corporate IdP rather than receive individual IAM users. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions
  2. Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider
  3. Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts
  4. Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider. Identity Center federates workforce access and centrally assigns account permission sets.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions can be valid when A privileged operator should receive AWS access only during an approved short maintenance window, it targets a different technical condition. Temporary elevated roles reduce standing administrative access exposure.

C:

This alternative, Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts, is appropriate when A global workforce needs consistent permission bundles across many AWS accounts. Permission sets standardize provisioned account roles for group-based access.

D:

For the separate situation A mobile application needs direct federated end-user authentication for its own customers, not AWS workforce console login, Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities could be useful. Cognito user pools provide application user sign-in rather than workforce account permission sets.

Question 42

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: An SAML-authenticated employee needs temporary console access to a delegated AWS role. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider
  2. Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts
  3. Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities
  4. Configure standards-based SAML federation with scoped role trust and attribute mapping

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure standards-based SAML federation with scoped role trust and attribute mapping. SAML identity assertions can authorize temporary AWS role sessions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider would address a different requirement: Workforce users must sign in with an existing corporate IdP rather than receive individual IAM users. Identity Center federates workforce access and centrally assigns account permission sets.

B:

This alternative, Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts, is appropriate when A global workforce needs consistent permission bundles across many AWS accounts. Permission sets standardize provisioned account roles for group-based access.

C:

For the separate situation A mobile application needs direct federated end-user authentication for its own customers, not AWS workforce console login, Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities could be useful. Cognito user pools provide application user sign-in rather than workforce account permission sets.

Question 43

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A global workforce needs consistent permission bundles across many AWS accounts. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts
  2. Configure standards-based SAML federation with scoped role trust and attribute mapping
  3. Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions
  4. Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts. Permission sets standardize provisioned account roles for group-based access.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation An SAML-authenticated employee needs temporary console access to a delegated AWS role, Configure standards-based SAML federation with scoped role trust and attribute mapping could be useful. SAML identity assertions can authorize temporary AWS role sessions.

C:

Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions solves the related scenario A privileged operator should receive AWS access only during an approved short maintenance window; temporary elevated roles reduce standing administrative access exposure.

D:

Although Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider can be valid when Workforce users must sign in with an existing corporate IdP rather than receive individual IAM users, it targets a different technical condition. Identity Center federates workforce access and centrally assigns account permission sets.

Question 44

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A mobile application needs direct federated end-user authentication for its own customers, not AWS workforce console login. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions
  2. Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider
  3. Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts
  4. Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities. Cognito user pools provide application user sign-in rather than workforce account permission sets.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A privileged operator should receive AWS access only during an approved short maintenance window, Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions could be useful. Temporary elevated roles reduce standing administrative access exposure.

B:

Integrate AWS IAM Identity Center with the corporate identity provider solves the related scenario Workforce users must sign in with an existing corporate IdP rather than receive individual IAM users; identity Center federates workforce access and centrally assigns account permission sets.

C:

Although Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts can be valid when A global workforce needs consistent permission bundles across many AWS accounts, it targets a different technical condition. Permission sets standardize provisioned account roles for group-based access.

Question 45

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A privileged operator should receive AWS access only during an approved short maintenance window. What should the architect implement?

  1. Configure standards-based SAML federation with scoped role trust and attribute mapping
  2. Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts
  3. Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities
  4. Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use time-bound privileged access workflows and short-lived role sessions. Temporary elevated roles reduce standing administrative access exposure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure standards-based SAML federation with scoped role trust and attribute mapping solves the related scenario An SAML-authenticated employee needs temporary console access to a delegated AWS role; sAML identity assertions can authorize temporary AWS role sessions.

B:

Although Use IAM Identity Center permission sets assigned to groups and target accounts can be valid when A global workforce needs consistent permission bundles across many AWS accounts, it targets a different technical condition. Permission sets standardize provisioned account roles for group-based access.

C:

Use Amazon Cognito user pools and supported federation for application identities would address a different requirement: A mobile application needs direct federated end-user authentication for its own customers, not AWS workforce console login. Cognito user pools provide application user sign-in rather than workforce account permission sets.

Question 46

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: Data encrypted with a customer managed KMS key must remain decryptable after an employee leaves the team. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key
  2. Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy
  3. Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies
  4. Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy. KMS access is evaluated against key and IAM policies, not tied to an employee's existence.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key would address a different requirement: A service team wants automatic yearly key material rotation without changing ciphertext references. KMS retains prior key material so old ciphertext remains decryptable after rotation.

C:

For the separate situation A multi-Region application needs matching cryptographic key identities and interoperable ciphertext across Regions, Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies could be useful. Related multi-Region keys share key material and key identifiers for cross-Region cryptographic operations.

D:

Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement solves the related scenario A legacy data export must use encryption keys held outside AWS KMS and independently managed; client-side encryption can preserve direct control of plaintext and key lifecycle outside KMS.

Question 47

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A service team wants automatic yearly key material rotation without changing ciphertext references. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies
  2. Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement
  3. Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing
  4. Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies, is appropriate when A multi-Region application needs matching cryptographic key identities and interoperable ciphertext across Regions. Related multi-Region keys share key material and key identifiers for cross-Region cryptographic operations.

B:

For the separate situation A legacy data export must use encryption keys held outside AWS KMS and independently managed, Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement could be useful. Client-side encryption can preserve direct control of plaintext and key lifecycle outside KMS.

C:

Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing solves the related scenario A sensitive S3 bucket should use customer-controlled key permissions and usage auditing; sSE-KMS integrates object encryption with key-policy control and KMS API logging.

Question 48

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A sensitive S3 bucket should use customer-controlled key permissions and usage auditing. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies
  2. Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy
  3. Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing
  4. Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing. SSE-KMS integrates object encryption with key-policy control and KMS API logging.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A multi-Region application needs matching cryptographic key identities and interoperable ciphertext across Regions, Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies could be useful. Related multi-Region keys share key material and key identifiers for cross-Region cryptographic operations.

B:

Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy solves the related scenario Data encrypted with a customer managed KMS key must remain decryptable after an employee leaves the team; kMS access is evaluated against key and IAM policies, not tied to an employee's existence.

D:

Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key would address a different requirement: A service team wants automatic yearly key material rotation without changing ciphertext references. KMS retains prior key material so old ciphertext remains decryptable after rotation.

Question 49

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A multi-Region application needs matching cryptographic key identities and interoperable ciphertext across Regions. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy
  2. Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key
  3. Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies
  4. Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies. Related multi-Region keys share key material and key identifiers for cross-Region cryptographic operations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy solves the related scenario Data encrypted with a customer managed KMS key must remain decryptable after an employee leaves the team; kMS access is evaluated against key and IAM policies, not tied to an employee's existence.

B:

Although Enable AWS KMS automatic rotation for an eligible symmetric customer managed key can be valid when A service team wants automatic yearly key material rotation without changing ciphertext references, it targets a different technical condition. KMS retains prior key material so old ciphertext remains decryptable after rotation.

D:

This alternative, Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement, is appropriate when A legacy data export must use encryption keys held outside AWS KMS and independently managed. Client-side encryption can preserve direct control of plaintext and key lifecycle outside KMS.

Question 50

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A legacy data export must use encryption keys held outside AWS KMS and independently managed. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing
  2. Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies
  3. Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy
  4. Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Choose supported client-side encryption or external key management per the requirement. Client-side encryption can preserve direct control of plaintext and key lifecycle outside KMS.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Configure SSE-KMS with a customer managed KMS key and appropriate CloudTrail auditing can be valid when A sensitive S3 bucket should use customer-controlled key permissions and usage auditing, it targets a different technical condition. SSE-KMS integrates object encryption with key-policy control and KMS API logging.

B:

Use AWS KMS multi-Region primary and replica keys with carefully governed key policies would address a different requirement: A multi-Region application needs matching cryptographic key identities and interoperable ciphertext across Regions. Related multi-Region keys share key material and key identifiers for cross-Region cryptographic operations.

C:

This alternative, Grant applications access through stable roles and preserve the KMS key and policy, is appropriate when Data encrypted with a customer managed KMS key must remain decryptable after an employee leaves the team. KMS access is evaluated against key and IAM policies, not tied to an employee's existence.