mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 4

Question 30

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: Teams require a centrally operated packet filter at the organization boundary without distributing custom EC2 firewalls. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use AWS Network Firewall firewall policies with centrally governed rule groups
  2. Route traffic through a dedicated inspection VPC with AWS Network Firewall and Transit Gateway
  3. Configure AZ-specific routes and inspection endpoints rather than hairpinning traffic across AZs
  4. Add appropriate domain-list rule groups to AWS Network Firewall

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use AWS Network Firewall firewall policies with centrally governed rule groups. Managed firewall policies centralize stateful rule administration and avoid self-managed firewall fleets.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Route traffic through a dedicated inspection VPC with AWS Network Firewall and Transit Gateway, is appropriate when A large VPC estate requires centrally managed stateful firewall inspection of east-west and egress flows. Centralized firewall endpoints provide managed stateful inspection with a shared routing architecture.

C:

For the separate situation An egress design must keep NAT and inspection traffic in the same Availability Zone where possible, Configure AZ-specific routes and inspection endpoints rather than hairpinning traffic across AZs could be useful. AZ-local routing avoids unnecessary cross-AZ transfer and asymmetric inspection paths.

D:

Add appropriate domain-list rule groups to AWS Network Firewall solves the related scenario An account must deny outbound access to an enumerated list of domain names at the VPC egress layer; network Firewall supports stateful domain-based egress filtering in supported protocols.

Question 31

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A network incident requires accepted and rejected flow metadata for an EC2 interface. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination
  2. Use CloudWatch Transit Gateway metrics and logs with appropriate traffic telemetry
  3. Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target
  4. Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records. Flow Logs capture IP flow metadata but not full packet payloads.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A route between a web instance and a database appears blocked before sending test traffic, Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination could be useful. Reachability Analyzer statically evaluates AWS network configuration for a path.

B:

Use CloudWatch Transit Gateway metrics and logs with appropriate traffic telemetry solves the related scenario A hybrid team needs to inspect every transit attachment's utilization and potential packet loss; transit Gateway observability helps isolate attachment and network path issues.

C:

Although Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target can be valid when A security analyst needs selected full-packet inspection rather than only VPC flow metadata, it targets a different technical condition. Traffic Mirroring duplicates packet traffic for network inspection appliances.

Question 32

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A route between a web instance and a database appears blocked before sending test traffic. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination
  2. Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets
  3. Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target
  4. Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination. Reachability Analyzer statically evaluates AWS network configuration for a path.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets can be valid when Packets fail only on outbound return traffic through custom stateless subnet filters, it targets a different technical condition. NACLs are stateless and require explicit rules in both directions.

C:

Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target would address a different requirement: A security analyst needs selected full-packet inspection rather than only VPC flow metadata. Traffic Mirroring duplicates packet traffic for network inspection appliances.

D:

This alternative, Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records, is appropriate when A network incident requires accepted and rejected flow metadata for an EC2 interface. Flow Logs capture IP flow metadata but not full packet payloads.

Question 33

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A hybrid team needs to inspect every transit attachment's utilization and potential packet loss. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use CloudWatch Transit Gateway metrics and logs with appropriate traffic telemetry
  2. Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target
  3. Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination
  4. Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use CloudWatch Transit Gateway metrics and logs with appropriate traffic telemetry. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target would address a different requirement: A security analyst needs selected full-packet inspection rather than only VPC flow metadata. Traffic Mirroring duplicates packet traffic for network inspection appliances.

C:

This alternative, Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination, is appropriate when A route between a web instance and a database appears blocked before sending test traffic. Reachability Analyzer statically evaluates AWS network configuration for a path.

D:

For the separate situation Packets fail only on outbound return traffic through custom stateless subnet filters, Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets could be useful. NACLs are stateless and require explicit rules in both directions.

Question 34

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: Packets fail only on outbound return traffic through custom stateless subnet filters. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets
  2. Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records
  3. Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination
  4. Use CloudWatch Transit Gateway metrics and logs with appropriate traffic telemetry

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets. NACLs are stateless and require explicit rules in both directions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records, is appropriate when A network incident requires accepted and rejected flow metadata for an EC2 interface. Flow Logs capture IP flow metadata but not full packet payloads.

C:

For the separate situation A route between a web instance and a database appears blocked before sending test traffic, Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination could be useful. Reachability Analyzer statically evaluates AWS network configuration for a path.

D:

Use CloudWatch Transit Gateway metrics and logs with appropriate traffic telemetry solves the related scenario A hybrid team needs to inspect every transit attachment's utilization and potential packet loss; transit Gateway observability helps isolate attachment and network path issues.

Question 35

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A security analyst needs selected full-packet inspection rather than only VPC flow metadata. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination
  2. Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets
  3. Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records
  4. Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure VPC Traffic Mirroring to a supported collector target. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Run VPC Reachability Analyzer between the specified source and destination, is appropriate when A route between a web instance and a database appears blocked before sending test traffic. Reachability Analyzer statically evaluates AWS network configuration for a path.

B:

For the separate situation Packets fail only on outbound return traffic through custom stateless subnet filters, Review network ACL inbound and outbound ephemeral-port rules for the affected subnets could be useful. NACLs are stateless and require explicit rules in both directions.

C:

Enable VPC Flow Logs for the relevant network interface and analyze records solves the related scenario A network incident requires accepted and rejected flow metadata for an EC2 interface; flow Logs capture IP flow metadata but not full packet payloads.

Question 36

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: An auditing application in a security account must list resources in member accounts without long-lived keys. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required
  2. Configure an appropriate KMS key policy and IAM permissions for the external principal
  3. Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls
  4. Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole. Temporary role sessions avoid distributing persistent credentials across accounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required solves the related scenario A service running on EC2 needs to access an S3 bucket in another account; cross-account access must satisfy both principal authorization and resource-side trust or policy.

B:

Although Configure an appropriate KMS key policy and IAM permissions for the external principal can be valid when An analyst needs permission to decrypt a KMS-protected object from a different account, it targets a different technical condition. Cross-account KMS use requires key-policy authorization as well as IAM permissions.

C:

Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls would address a different requirement: An assumed role's policy allows an action but the member account SCP explicitly denies it. SCP denies form a permissions ceiling that IAM allows cannot override.

Question 37

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: An assumed role's policy allows an action but the member account SCP explicitly denies it. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition
  2. Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole
  3. Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls
  4. Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls. SCP denies form a permissions ceiling that IAM allows cannot override.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition can be valid when An external vendor must assume a role without allowing confused-deputy access, it targets a different technical condition. The external ID binds role assumption to the intended customer relationship.

B:

Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole would address a different requirement: An auditing application in a security account must list resources in member accounts without long-lived keys. Temporary role sessions avoid distributing persistent credentials across accounts.

D:

For the separate situation A service running on EC2 needs to access an S3 bucket in another account, Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required could be useful. Cross-account access must satisfy both principal authorization and resource-side trust or policy.

Question 38

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A service running on EC2 needs to access an S3 bucket in another account. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required
  2. Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole
  3. Configure an appropriate KMS key policy and IAM permissions for the external principal
  4. Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required. Cross-account access must satisfy both principal authorization and resource-side trust or policy.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole, is appropriate when An auditing application in a security account must list resources in member accounts without long-lived keys. Temporary role sessions avoid distributing persistent credentials across accounts.

C:

For the separate situation An analyst needs permission to decrypt a KMS-protected object from a different account, Configure an appropriate KMS key policy and IAM permissions for the external principal could be useful. Cross-account KMS use requires key-policy authorization as well as IAM permissions.

D:

Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition solves the related scenario An external vendor must assume a role without allowing confused-deputy access; the external ID binds role assumption to the intended customer relationship.

Question 39

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: An analyst needs permission to decrypt a KMS-protected object from a different account. What should the architect implement?

  1. Configure an appropriate KMS key policy and IAM permissions for the external principal
  2. Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required
  3. Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition
  4. Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure an appropriate KMS key policy and IAM permissions for the external principal. Cross-account KMS use requires key-policy authorization as well as IAM permissions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A service running on EC2 needs to access an S3 bucket in another account, Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required could be useful. Cross-account access must satisfy both principal authorization and resource-side trust or policy.

C:

Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition solves the related scenario An external vendor must assume a role without allowing confused-deputy access; the external ID binds role assumption to the intended customer relationship.

D:

Although Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls can be valid when An assumed role's policy allows an action but the member account SCP explicitly denies it, it targets a different technical condition. SCP denies form a permissions ceiling that IAM allows cannot override.

Question 40

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: An external vendor must assume a role without allowing confused-deputy access. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition
  2. Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required
  3. Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole
  4. Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Require a vendor-specific external ID in the role trust-policy condition. The external ID binds role assumption to the intended customer relationship.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Grant the instance role permissions and configure the destination bucket resource policy as required solves the related scenario A service running on EC2 needs to access an S3 bucket in another account; cross-account access must satisfy both principal authorization and resource-side trust or policy.

C:

Although Configure a narrowly scoped cross-account IAM role trusted by the security account and use STS AssumeRole can be valid when An auditing application in a security account must list resources in member accounts without long-lived keys, it targets a different technical condition. Temporary role sessions avoid distributing persistent credentials across accounts.

D:

Remove the organizational SCP deny if authorized while preserving least-privilege IAM controls would address a different requirement: An assumed role's policy allows an action but the member account SCP explicitly denies it. SCP denies form a permissions ceiling that IAM allows cannot override.