mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 7

Question 60

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: An auditor needs to know which external principals can access KMS keys and IAM roles. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions
  2. Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings
  3. Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally
  4. Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use IAM Access Analyzer to review external access findings. Access Analyzer models resource-policy trust and reports potentially unintended outside access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Attach an AWS Organizations SCP that restricts Region-specific APIs with suitable global-service exceptions, is appropriate when Security must prevent a workload account from launching resources in prohibited AWS Regions. SCPs centrally constrain maximum allowed account permissions.

C:

Enable AWS Config rules and aggregate compliance results centrally solves the related scenario An organization wants to continuously identify publicly exposed S3 buckets without periodic manual audits; config rules evaluate resource configuration against policies and emit noncompliance states.

D:

Although Designate an organization administrator and enable organization-wide GuardDuty management can be valid when Multiple accounts need a consolidated view of GuardDuty findings without signing in individually, it targets a different technical condition. Delegated GuardDuty administration centralizes threat findings across enrolled accounts.

Question 61

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: The security team must collect management API history from every organization account in a centralized location. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery
  2. Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow
  3. Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket
  4. Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery. Organization trails collect governance events consistently across member accounts.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow can be valid when A central detection pipeline must react when an account logs an IAM policy attachment event, it targets a different technical condition. EventBridge rules can invoke security workflows from selected API activity.

C:

Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket would address a different requirement: Application teams may not delete security log objects before a regulated retention period ends. Object Lock protects retained object versions against premature deletion within configured mode.

D:

This alternative, Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account, is appropriate when A finance team needs an immutable record of which accounts were invited into an organization. CloudTrail management events provide auditable organizational API actions.

Question 62

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: Investigators require object-level S3 GetObject and PutObject access records. What should the architect implement?

  1. Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow
  2. Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket
  3. Enable CloudTrail S3 data events for the required bucket or object selectors
  4. Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable CloudTrail S3 data events for the required bucket or object selectors. Object data events are distinct from default management event coverage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow can be valid when A central detection pipeline must react when an account logs an IAM policy attachment event, it targets a different technical condition. EventBridge rules can invoke security workflows from selected API activity.

B:

Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket would address a different requirement: Application teams may not delete security log objects before a regulated retention period ends. Object Lock protects retained object versions against premature deletion within configured mode.

D:

For the separate situation The security team must collect management API history from every organization account in a centralized location, Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery could be useful. Organization trails collect governance events consistently across member accounts.

Question 63

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A central detection pipeline must react when an account logs an IAM policy attachment event. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account
  2. Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery
  3. Enable CloudTrail S3 data events for the required bucket or object selectors
  4. Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow. EventBridge rules can invoke security workflows from selected API activity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account would address a different requirement: A finance team needs an immutable record of which accounts were invited into an organization. CloudTrail management events provide auditable organizational API actions.

B:

This alternative, Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery, is appropriate when The security team must collect management API history from every organization account in a centralized location. Organization trails collect governance events consistently across member accounts.

C:

For the separate situation Investigators require object-level S3 GetObject and PutObject access records, Enable CloudTrail S3 data events for the required bucket or object selectors could be useful. Object data events are distinct from default management event coverage.

Question 64

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: Application teams may not delete security log objects before a regulated retention period ends. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery
  2. Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow
  3. Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account
  4. Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Create an organization-level CloudTrail trail with secure central S3 delivery, is appropriate when The security team must collect management API history from every organization account in a centralized location. Organization trails collect governance events consistently across member accounts.

B:

For the separate situation A central detection pipeline must react when an account logs an IAM policy attachment event, Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow could be useful. EventBridge rules can invoke security workflows from selected API activity.

C:

Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account solves the related scenario A finance team needs an immutable record of which accounts were invited into an organization; cloudTrail management events provide auditable organizational API actions.

Question 65

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A finance team needs an immutable record of which accounts were invited into an organization. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account
  2. Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow
  3. Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket
  4. Enable CloudTrail S3 data events for the required bucket or object selectors

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Retain AWS Organizations API events in an appropriately secured CloudTrail logging account. CloudTrail management events provide auditable organizational API actions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Route matching CloudTrail events through Amazon EventBridge to the remediation workflow solves the related scenario A central detection pipeline must react when an account logs an IAM policy attachment event; eventBridge rules can invoke security workflows from selected API activity.

C:

Although Enable S3 Object Lock with appropriately governed retention on the evidence bucket can be valid when Application teams may not delete security log objects before a regulated retention period ends, it targets a different technical condition. Object Lock protects retained object versions against premature deletion within configured mode.

D:

Enable CloudTrail S3 data events for the required bucket or object selectors would address a different requirement: Investigators require object-level S3 GetObject and PutObject access records. Object data events are distinct from default management event coverage.

Question 66

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A noncritical nightly batch service can lose several hours of work and recover the following day. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks
  2. Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services
  3. Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes
  4. Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks. A long RTO and RPO justify inexpensive recovery from stored backups.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services would address a different requirement: An application has a four-hour RTO but recovery requires core infrastructure ready with no application fleet running. Pilot light retains critical foundations while scaling application capacity during recovery.

C:

This alternative, Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes, is appropriate when A migration plan calls for zero data loss even though database replication is asynchronous. Asynchronous cross-Region replication cannot guarantee zero committed-transaction loss.

D:

For the separate situation A customer-facing API needs recovery within an hour but cannot justify full active-active deployment, Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources could be useful. Warm standby trades steady-state cost for faster recovery than backup-only or pilot light.

Question 67

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A customer-facing API needs recovery within an hour but cannot justify full active-active deployment. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes
  2. Design a suitably replicated multi-Region active-active architecture with tested conflict handling
  3. Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services
  4. Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources. Warm standby trades steady-state cost for faster recovery than backup-only or pilot light.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes would address a different requirement: A migration plan calls for zero data loss even though database replication is asynchronous. Asynchronous cross-Region replication cannot guarantee zero committed-transaction loss.

B:

This alternative, Design a suitably replicated multi-Region active-active architecture with tested conflict handling, is appropriate when An essential payments service requires near-zero recovery downtime across regional disruptions. Active-active serves traffic in multiple Regions without waiting to create standby infrastructure.

C:

For the separate situation An application has a four-hour RTO but recovery requires core infrastructure ready with no application fleet running, Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services could be useful. Pilot light retains critical foundations while scaling application capacity during recovery.

Question 68

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: An essential payments service requires near-zero recovery downtime across regional disruptions. What should the architect implement?

  1. Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks
  2. Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources
  3. Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services
  4. Design a suitably replicated multi-Region active-active architecture with tested conflict handling

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Design a suitably replicated multi-Region active-active architecture with tested conflict handling. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks, is appropriate when A noncritical nightly batch service can lose several hours of work and recover the following day. A long RTO and RPO justify inexpensive recovery from stored backups.

B:

For the separate situation A customer-facing API needs recovery within an hour but cannot justify full active-active deployment, Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources could be useful. Warm standby trades steady-state cost for faster recovery than backup-only or pilot light.

C:

Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services solves the related scenario An application has a four-hour RTO but recovery requires core infrastructure ready with no application fleet running; pilot light retains critical foundations while scaling application capacity during recovery.

Question 69

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: An application has a four-hour RTO but recovery requires core infrastructure ready with no application fleet running. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources
  2. Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes
  3. Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks
  4. Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services. Pilot light retains critical foundations while scaling application capacity during recovery.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A customer-facing API needs recovery within an hour but cannot justify full active-active deployment, Implement a warm standby stack with preprovisioned reduced-capacity resources could be useful. Warm standby trades steady-state cost for faster recovery than backup-only or pilot light.

B:

Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes solves the related scenario A migration plan calls for zero data loss even though database replication is asynchronous; asynchronous cross-Region replication cannot guarantee zero committed-transaction loss.

C:

Although Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks can be valid when A noncritical nightly batch service can lose several hours of work and recover the following day, it targets a different technical condition. A long RTO and RPO justify inexpensive recovery from stored backups.

Question 70

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A migration plan calls for zero data loss even though database replication is asynchronous. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services
  2. Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes
  3. Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks
  4. Design a suitably replicated multi-Region active-active architecture with tested conflict handling

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Reconcile the zero-RPO requirement with synchronous replication or transaction acceptance changes. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Choose a pilot-light recovery pattern for persistent essential services solves the related scenario An application has a four-hour RTO but recovery requires core infrastructure ready with no application fleet running; pilot light retains critical foundations while scaling application capacity during recovery.

C:

Select a backup-and-restore recovery pattern with tested restore runbooks would address a different requirement: A noncritical nightly batch service can lose several hours of work and recover the following day. A long RTO and RPO justify inexpensive recovery from stored backups.

D:

This alternative, Design a suitably replicated multi-Region active-active architecture with tested conflict handling, is appropriate when An essential payments service requires near-zero recovery downtime across regional disruptions. Active-active serves traffic in multiple Regions without waiting to create standby infrastructure.