mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 13

Question 120

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A running commitment is underused after migration to smaller instances. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline
  2. Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments
  3. Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments
  4. Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments. Existing commitment utilization determines whether additional capacity discounts save money.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline solves the related scenario A steady fleet of EC2 web servers runs all day with unpredictable instance-family changes; compute Savings Plans cover eligible compute usage flexibly across supported families and Regions.

B:

Although Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments can be valid when A fixed EC2 instance family is used continuously in one Region and cost minimization is paramount, it targets a different technical condition. Narrower commitments can reduce cost when predictable usage justifies less flexibility.

D:

This alternative, Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries, is appropriate when A fault-tolerant batch queue can stop and resume tasks whenever spare capacity disappears. Spot provides discount capacity with reclaim risk suited to flexible workloads.

Question 121

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: An S3 bucket holds infrequently accessed immutable audit logs that must be retrievable rapidly on demand. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier
  2. Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class
  3. Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions
  4. Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class. Lifecycle transitions align per-GB storage price with infrequent access and retrieval requirements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier would address a different requirement: An archived dataset is rarely accessed and can tolerate a multi-hour restore. Glacier archival tiers lower storage charges in exchange for retrieval constraints.

C:

For the separate situation A company needs visibility into which buckets contain cold or small objects before changing policies, Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions could be useful. Storage Lens surfaces capacity and activity trends across buckets and accounts.

D:

Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions solves the related scenario Millions of tiny frequently accessed objects are being moved to low-cost archive blindly; object overhead and minimum storage durations can outweigh nominal per-GB class savings.

Question 122

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A dataset has unpredictable object access patterns and operations cannot manage tiers manually. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Choose S3 Intelligent-Tiering where object size and monitoring economics fit
  2. Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier
  3. Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions
  4. Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Choose S3 Intelligent-Tiering where object size and monitoring economics fit. Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves qualifying objects based on access activity.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation An archived dataset is rarely accessed and can tolerate a multi-hour restore, Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier could be useful. Glacier archival tiers lower storage charges in exchange for retrieval constraints.

C:

Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions solves the related scenario A company needs visibility into which buckets contain cold or small objects before changing policies; storage Lens surfaces capacity and activity trends across buckets and accounts.

D:

Although Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class can be valid when An S3 bucket holds infrequently accessed immutable audit logs that must be retrievable rapidly on demand, it targets a different technical condition. Lifecycle transitions align per-GB storage price with infrequent access and retrieval requirements.

Question 123

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: An archived dataset is rarely accessed and can tolerate a multi-hour restore. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions
  2. Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier
  3. Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class
  4. Choose S3 Intelligent-Tiering where object size and monitoring economics fit

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier. Glacier archival tiers lower storage charges in exchange for retrieval constraints.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation Millions of tiny frequently accessed objects are being moved to low-cost archive blindly, Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions could be useful. Object overhead and minimum storage durations can outweigh nominal per-GB class savings.

C:

Although Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class can be valid when An S3 bucket holds infrequently accessed immutable audit logs that must be retrievable rapidly on demand, it targets a different technical condition. Lifecycle transitions align per-GB storage price with infrequent access and retrieval requirements.

D:

Choose S3 Intelligent-Tiering where object size and monitoring economics fit would address a different requirement: A dataset has unpredictable object access patterns and operations cannot manage tiers manually. Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves qualifying objects based on access activity.

Question 124

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A company needs visibility into which buckets contain cold or small objects before changing policies. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions
  2. Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class
  3. Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier
  4. Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions. Storage Lens surfaces capacity and activity trends across buckets and accounts.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Apply a lifecycle policy to move eligible objects to a suitable S3 infrequent-access class can be valid when An S3 bucket holds infrequently accessed immutable audit logs that must be retrievable rapidly on demand, it targets a different technical condition. Lifecycle transitions align per-GB storage price with infrequent access and retrieval requirements.

C:

Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier would address a different requirement: An archived dataset is rarely accessed and can tolerate a multi-hour restore. Glacier archival tiers lower storage charges in exchange for retrieval constraints.

D:

This alternative, Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions, is appropriate when Millions of tiny frequently accessed objects are being moved to low-cost archive blindly. Object overhead and minimum storage durations can outweigh nominal per-GB class savings.

Question 125

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: Millions of tiny frequently accessed objects are being moved to low-cost archive blindly. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions
  2. Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier
  3. Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions
  4. Choose S3 Intelligent-Tiering where object size and monitoring economics fit

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Evaluate per-object metadata, minimum billing, and retrieval fees before lifecycle transitions. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Move eligible objects to an S3 Glacier archival storage class with an appropriate retrieval tier would address a different requirement: An archived dataset is rarely accessed and can tolerate a multi-hour restore. Glacier archival tiers lower storage charges in exchange for retrieval constraints.

C:

This alternative, Review Amazon S3 Storage Lens metrics and storage class distributions, is appropriate when A company needs visibility into which buckets contain cold or small objects before changing policies. Storage Lens surfaces capacity and activity trends across buckets and accounts.

D:

For the separate situation A dataset has unpredictable object access patterns and operations cannot manage tiers manually, Choose S3 Intelligent-Tiering where object size and monitoring economics fit could be useful. Intelligent-Tiering automatically moves qualifying objects based on access activity.

Question 126

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: Two compute tiers in the same Region exchange heavy traffic while spread across AZs. What should the architect implement?

  1. Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability
  2. Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation
  3. Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity
  4. Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation. Inter-AZ network charges can dominate high-volume chatty application traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability, is appropriate when Old unattached EBS volumes remain billed after test environments are torn down. Unattached EBS storage continues accruing capacity charges until removed.

C:

Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity solves the related scenario A mature service has predictable nightly idle periods but EC2 servers remain fully provisioned; elastic capacity aligns compute spend to demand while retaining availability limits.

D:

Although Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint can be valid when A private service calls S3 through a NAT gateway and incurs unexpected data-processing fees, it targets a different technical condition. S3 gateway endpoint routes avoid NAT processing charges for qualifying traffic.

Question 127

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A private service calls S3 through a NAT gateway and incurs unexpected data-processing fees. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity
  2. Use Compute Optimizer and telemetry to rightsize instances after testing performance headroom
  3. Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint
  4. Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint. S3 gateway endpoint routes avoid NAT processing charges for qualifying traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A mature service has predictable nightly idle periods but EC2 servers remain fully provisioned, Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity could be useful. Elastic capacity aligns compute spend to demand while retaining availability limits.

B:

Use Compute Optimizer and telemetry to rightsize instances after testing performance headroom solves the related scenario An EC2 fleet runs at 5% utilization and serves a steady but smaller load; rightsizing removes idle compute capacity without requiring a purchase commitment.

D:

Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability would address a different requirement: Old unattached EBS volumes remain billed after test environments are torn down. Unattached EBS storage continues accruing capacity charges until removed.

Question 128

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: An EC2 fleet runs at 5% utilization and serves a steady but smaller load. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation
  2. Use Compute Optimizer and telemetry to rightsize instances after testing performance headroom
  3. Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint
  4. Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use Compute Optimizer and telemetry to rightsize instances after testing performance headroom. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation solves the related scenario Two compute tiers in the same Region exchange heavy traffic while spread across AZs; inter-AZ network charges can dominate high-volume chatty application traffic.

C:

Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint would address a different requirement: A private service calls S3 through a NAT gateway and incurs unexpected data-processing fees. S3 gateway endpoint routes avoid NAT processing charges for qualifying traffic.

D:

This alternative, Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability, is appropriate when Old unattached EBS volumes remain billed after test environments are torn down. Unattached EBS storage continues accruing capacity charges until removed.

Question 129

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: Old unattached EBS volumes remain billed after test environments are torn down. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability
  2. Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint
  3. Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity
  4. Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Route supported S3 traffic through a gateway VPC endpoint would address a different requirement: A private service calls S3 through a NAT gateway and incurs unexpected data-processing fees. S3 gateway endpoint routes avoid NAT processing charges for qualifying traffic.

C:

This alternative, Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity, is appropriate when A mature service has predictable nightly idle periods but EC2 servers remain fully provisioned. Elastic capacity aligns compute spend to demand while retaining availability limits.

D:

For the separate situation Two compute tiers in the same Region exchange heavy traffic while spread across AZs, Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation could be useful. Inter-AZ network charges can dominate high-volume chatty application traffic.

Question 130

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A mature service has predictable nightly idle periods but EC2 servers remain fully provisioned. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability
  2. Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity
  3. Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation
  4. Use Compute Optimizer and telemetry to rightsize instances after testing performance headroom

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Implement scheduled or metric-based Auto Scaling to reduce idle capacity. Elastic capacity aligns compute spend to demand while retaining availability limits.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inventory detached volumes and delete or archive them after confirming recoverability would address a different requirement: Old unattached EBS volumes remain billed after test environments are torn down. Unattached EBS storage continues accruing capacity charges until removed.

C:

For the separate situation Two compute tiers in the same Region exchange heavy traffic while spread across AZs, Model and reduce unnecessary cross-AZ transfers while retaining required fault isolation could be useful. Inter-AZ network charges can dominate high-volume chatty application traffic.

D:

Use Compute Optimizer and telemetry to rightsize instances after testing performance headroom solves the related scenario An EC2 fleet runs at 5% utilization and serves a steady but smaller load; rightsizing removes idle compute capacity without requiring a purchase commitment.