mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 11

Question 100

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: Governance engineers must prevent creation of prohibited public resources in supported accounts. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails
  2. Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms
  3. Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment
  4. Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails. Preventive guardrails block unauthorized actions instead of only reporting after deployment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms would address a different requirement: Security wants to detect deviation from required resource configuration within enrolled accounts. Detective controls evaluate drift rather than simply preventing API calls.

C:

This alternative, Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment, is appropriate when A regulated enterprise needs repeatable baseline accounts, log archive, audit roles, and guardrails. Control Tower orchestrates standardized account baselines and governance controls.

D:

For the separate situation An account created outside the standard platform violates Control Tower controls and must join governance, Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures could be useful. Enrollment brings a member account under landing-zone guardrails without assuming it was originally vended.

Question 101

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: Multiple AWS accounts should create subnets in a single centrally managed network VPC. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share
  2. Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts
  3. Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope
  4. Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope. VPC sharing lets participant resources use centrally owned subnet networking.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share, is appropriate when An organization mistakenly treats RAM sharing as authorization for all participating accounts to invoke every service. Resource discovery and sharing do not automatically bypass required service permissions.

B:

For the separate situation Many business-unit accounts need access to a common private Route 53 Resolver rule, Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts could be useful. Central shared DNS forwarding avoids inconsistent copied configurations.

D:

Although Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals can be valid when A central account needs to share a license-managed resource through an existing organization, it targets a different technical condition. RAM implements cross-account sharing of eligible resource types.

Question 102

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A central networking team owns a Transit Gateway that application accounts must attach to. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Share the Transit Gateway resource using AWS RAM and approve or autoaccept attachments appropriately
  2. Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope
  3. Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts
  4. Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Share the Transit Gateway resource using AWS RAM and approve or autoaccept attachments appropriately. RAM shares eligible infrastructure while the network team retains transit ownership.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope solves the related scenario Multiple AWS accounts should create subnets in a single centrally managed network VPC; vPC sharing lets participant resources use centrally owned subnet networking.

C:

Although Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts can be valid when Many business-unit accounts need access to a common private Route 53 Resolver rule, it targets a different technical condition. Central shared DNS forwarding avoids inconsistent copied configurations.

D:

Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals would address a different requirement: A central account needs to share a license-managed resource through an existing organization. RAM implements cross-account sharing of eligible resource types.

Question 103

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: Many business-unit accounts need access to a common private Route 53 Resolver rule. What should the architect implement?

  1. Share the Transit Gateway resource using AWS RAM and approve or autoaccept attachments appropriately
  2. Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share
  3. Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts
  4. Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts. Central shared DNS forwarding avoids inconsistent copied configurations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Share the Transit Gateway resource using AWS RAM and approve or autoaccept attachments appropriately solves the related scenario A central networking team owns a Transit Gateway that application accounts must attach to; rAM shares eligible infrastructure while the network team retains transit ownership.

B:

Although Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share can be valid when An organization mistakenly treats RAM sharing as authorization for all participating accounts to invoke every service, it targets a different technical condition. Resource discovery and sharing do not automatically bypass required service permissions.

D:

This alternative, Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope, is appropriate when Multiple AWS accounts should create subnets in a single centrally managed network VPC. VPC sharing lets participant resources use centrally owned subnet networking.

Question 104

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A central account needs to share a license-managed resource through an existing organization. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share
  2. Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope
  3. Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals
  4. Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals. RAM implements cross-account sharing of eligible resource types.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share can be valid when An organization mistakenly treats RAM sharing as authorization for all participating accounts to invoke every service, it targets a different technical condition. Resource discovery and sharing do not automatically bypass required service permissions.

B:

Share VPC subnets with participant accounts by using AWS RAM within supported organization scope would address a different requirement: Multiple AWS accounts should create subnets in a single centrally managed network VPC. VPC sharing lets participant resources use centrally owned subnet networking.

D:

For the separate situation Many business-unit accounts need access to a common private Route 53 Resolver rule, Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts could be useful. Central shared DNS forwarding avoids inconsistent copied configurations.

Question 105

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: An organization mistakenly treats RAM sharing as authorization for all participating accounts to invoke every service. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Share the Transit Gateway resource using AWS RAM and approve or autoaccept attachments appropriately
  2. Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share
  3. Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts
  4. Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Maintain separate IAM and resource-policy permissions in addition to the RAM share. Resource discovery and sharing do not automatically bypass required service permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Share the Transit Gateway resource using AWS RAM and approve or autoaccept attachments appropriately would address a different requirement: A central networking team owns a Transit Gateway that application accounts must attach to. RAM shares eligible infrastructure while the network team retains transit ownership.

C:

For the separate situation Many business-unit accounts need access to a common private Route 53 Resolver rule, Share the Resolver forwarding rule through AWS RAM with participating accounts could be useful. Central shared DNS forwarding avoids inconsistent copied configurations.

D:

Use an AWS RAM resource share for the supported resource type and intended principals solves the related scenario A central account needs to share a license-managed resource through an existing organization; rAM implements cross-account sharing of eligible resource types.

Question 106

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: An organization must deliver its member accounts CloudTrail events to a security-owned bucket. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection
  2. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles
  3. Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions
  4. Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions. A centrally managed trail enables common event collection across organization accounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation Security needs organization-wide AWS Config compliance data in one account, Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection could be useful. An aggregator combines compliance findings while configuration recording still occurs in source accounts.

B:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles solves the related scenario Teams in different accounts need standardized metrics and log views with governed read access; cross-account observability enables centralized investigation while retaining workload-account ownership.

D:

Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults would address a different requirement: Backup policies must protect resources in many accounts but recovery access should remain isolated. Organization-aware backup governance can separate operational ownership from recovery safeguards.

Question 107

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: Security needs organization-wide AWS Config compliance data in one account. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles
  2. Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults
  3. Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection
  4. Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection. An aggregator combines compliance findings while configuration recording still occurs in source accounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles solves the related scenario Teams in different accounts need standardized metrics and log views with governed read access; cross-account observability enables centralized investigation while retaining workload-account ownership.

B:

Although Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults can be valid when Backup policies must protect resources in many accounts but recovery access should remain isolated, it targets a different technical condition. Organization-aware backup governance can separate operational ownership from recovery safeguards.

D:

This alternative, Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions, is appropriate when A security account must receive selected GuardDuty and Security Hub events from member accounts. Cross-account event buses deliver security signals without granting full account access.

Question 108

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A security account must receive selected GuardDuty and Security Hub events from member accounts. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions
  2. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles
  3. Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions
  4. Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles would address a different requirement: Teams in different accounts need standardized metrics and log views with governed read access. Cross-account observability enables centralized investigation while retaining workload-account ownership.

C:

This alternative, Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions, is appropriate when An organization must deliver its member accounts CloudTrail events to a security-owned bucket. A centrally managed trail enables common event collection across organization accounts.

D:

For the separate situation Security needs organization-wide AWS Config compliance data in one account, Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection could be useful. An aggregator combines compliance findings while configuration recording still occurs in source accounts.

Question 109

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: Teams in different accounts need standardized metrics and log views with governed read access. What should the architect implement?

  1. Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions
  2. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles
  3. Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection
  4. Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles. Cross-account observability enables centralized investigation while retaining workload-account ownership.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions would address a different requirement: An organization must deliver its member accounts CloudTrail events to a security-owned bucket. A centrally managed trail enables common event collection across organization accounts.

C:

For the separate situation Security needs organization-wide AWS Config compliance data in one account, Create a Config aggregator with appropriate organization and Region collection could be useful. An aggregator combines compliance findings while configuration recording still occurs in source accounts.

D:

Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults solves the related scenario Backup policies must protect resources in many accounts but recovery access should remain isolated; organization-aware backup governance can separate operational ownership from recovery safeguards.

Question 110

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: Backup policies must protect resources in many accounts but recovery access should remain isolated. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults
  2. Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions
  3. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles
  4. Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults. Organization-aware backup governance can separate operational ownership from recovery safeguards.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A security account must receive selected GuardDuty and Security Hub events from member accounts, Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions could be useful. Cross-account event buses deliver security signals without granting full account access.

C:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles solves the related scenario Teams in different accounts need standardized metrics and log views with governed read access; cross-account observability enables centralized investigation while retaining workload-account ownership.

D:

Although Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions can be valid when An organization must deliver its member accounts CloudTrail events to a security-owned bucket, it targets a different technical condition. A centrally managed trail enables common event collection across organization accounts.