mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 15

Question 140

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: An application release must stop automatically when the error rate rises above a predefined threshold. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Use CodeDeploy Lambda canary deployment with an alias and CloudWatch rollback alarm
  2. Bind deployment lifecycle alarms to rollback and bake-period monitoring
  3. Configure ECS rolling deployment minimum healthy percent and maximum percent
  4. Adopt a blue-green deployment using separate target groups and health-based traffic shifting

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Bind deployment lifecycle alarms to rollback and bake-period monitoring. Metric-gated rollback prevents continuing a demonstrably unhealthy release.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A Lambda function update must be exposed to 10% of users before broader rollout, Use CodeDeploy Lambda canary deployment with an alias and CloudWatch rollback alarm could be useful. Traffic shifting and alarm hooks limit impact of a faulty function revision.

C:

Although Configure ECS rolling deployment minimum healthy percent and maximum percent can be valid when A container platform must deploy a new image without terminating all old tasks simultaneously, it targets a different technical condition. Rolling task replacement maintains defined healthy capacity during deployments.

D:

Adopt a blue-green deployment using separate target groups and health-based traffic shifting would address a different requirement: A web fleet update must allow immediate routing back to the previous version after failed health checks. Two independently serving versions permit fast traffic reversal.

Question 141

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A source commit must build, test, and deploy a versioned package without developer laptops. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow
  2. Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates
  3. Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action
  4. Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action. Managed pipeline stages connect source changes to repeatable verified deployments.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow can be valid when A supply-chain audit must tie running application code to a signed build artifact, it targets a different technical condition. Artifact integrity checks prevent substitution between build and deployment.

B:

Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates would address a different requirement: A monorepo must build only the services modified by a commit while preserving mandatory shared tests. Selective builds reduce time without dropping essential integration validation.

D:

For the separate situation A deployment pipeline needs scoped access to target accounts but must not store target-account access keys, Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS could be useful. Role assumption supplies temporary credentials for controlled cross-account deployments.

Question 142

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A deployment must consume precisely the container image that passed the security scan. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Promote immutable Amazon ECR image digests between environments
  2. Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow
  3. Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action
  4. Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Promote immutable Amazon ECR image digests between environments. Digest references prevent mutable tags from silently changing the tested artifact.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow, is appropriate when A supply-chain audit must tie running application code to a signed build artifact. Artifact integrity checks prevent substitution between build and deployment.

C:

For the separate situation A source commit must build, test, and deploy a versioned package without developer laptops, Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action could be useful. Managed pipeline stages connect source changes to repeatable verified deployments.

D:

Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS solves the related scenario A deployment pipeline needs scoped access to target accounts but must not store target-account access keys; role assumption supplies temporary credentials for controlled cross-account deployments.

Question 143

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A deployment pipeline needs scoped access to target accounts but must not store target-account access keys. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action
  2. Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS
  3. Promote immutable Amazon ECR image digests between environments
  4. Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS. Role assumption supplies temporary credentials for controlled cross-account deployments.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action, is appropriate when A source commit must build, test, and deploy a versioned package without developer laptops. Managed pipeline stages connect source changes to repeatable verified deployments.

C:

Promote immutable Amazon ECR image digests between environments solves the related scenario A deployment must consume precisely the container image that passed the security scan; digest references prevent mutable tags from silently changing the tested artifact.

D:

Although Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates can be valid when A monorepo must build only the services modified by a commit while preserving mandatory shared tests, it targets a different technical condition. Selective builds reduce time without dropping essential integration validation.

Question 144

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A supply-chain audit must tie running application code to a signed build artifact. What should the architect implement?

  1. Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS
  2. Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow
  3. Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates
  4. Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow. Artifact integrity checks prevent substitution between build and deployment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A deployment pipeline needs scoped access to target accounts but must not store target-account access keys, Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS could be useful. Role assumption supplies temporary credentials for controlled cross-account deployments.

C:

Although Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates can be valid when A monorepo must build only the services modified by a commit while preserving mandatory shared tests, it targets a different technical condition. Selective builds reduce time without dropping essential integration validation.

D:

Compose CodePipeline stages with CodeBuild and an appropriate deployment action would address a different requirement: A source commit must build, test, and deploy a versioned package without developer laptops. Managed pipeline stages connect source changes to repeatable verified deployments.

Question 145

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A monorepo must build only the services modified by a commit while preserving mandatory shared tests. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow
  2. Promote immutable Amazon ECR image digests between environments
  3. Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS
  4. Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Filter pipeline triggers by source paths and retain cross-cutting quality gates. Selective builds reduce time without dropping essential integration validation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Record artifact digests and verify cryptographic signatures in the promotion workflow solves the related scenario A supply-chain audit must tie running application code to a signed build artifact; artifact integrity checks prevent substitution between build and deployment.

B:

Although Promote immutable Amazon ECR image digests between environments can be valid when A deployment must consume precisely the container image that passed the security scan, it targets a different technical condition. Digest references prevent mutable tags from silently changing the tested artifact.

C:

Let the pipeline assume restricted deployment roles through AWS STS would address a different requirement: A deployment pipeline needs scoped access to target accounts but must not store target-account access keys. Role assumption supplies temporary credentials for controlled cross-account deployments.

Question 146

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A service owner wants to run HTTP containers without provisioning or maintaining EC2 worker nodes. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control
  2. Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform
  3. Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks
  4. Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks. Fargate runs supported container workloads without customer-managed instances.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control would address a different requirement: A simple static web UI must deploy globally without maintaining web servers. S3 and CloudFront deliver static assets without an always-on application server.

B:

This alternative, Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform, is appropriate when A Java web app requires application environment provisioning and deployment automation without designing an ECS cluster. Elastic Beanstalk manages application deployment and environment infrastructure.

D:

Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls solves the related scenario A team has Kubernetes manifests and needs managed control-plane operations; eKS manages the Kubernetes control plane while teams operate cluster workloads.

Question 147

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A Java web app requires application environment provisioning and deployment automation without designing an ECS cluster. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration
  2. Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform
  3. Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls
  4. Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform. Elastic Beanstalk manages application deployment and environment infrastructure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration, is appropriate when A workload needs short event-triggered code execution with per-invocation scale and no server provisioning. Lambda runs event handlers on demand within the service execution limits.

C:

Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls solves the related scenario A team has Kubernetes manifests and needs managed control-plane operations; eKS manages the Kubernetes control plane while teams operate cluster workloads.

D:

Although Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control can be valid when A simple static web UI must deploy globally without maintaining web servers, it targets a different technical condition. S3 and CloudFront deliver static assets without an always-on application server.

Question 148

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A workload needs short event-triggered code execution with per-invocation scale and no server provisioning. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform
  2. Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls
  3. Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration
  4. Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration. Lambda runs event handlers on demand within the service execution limits.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A Java web app requires application environment provisioning and deployment automation without designing an ECS cluster, Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform could be useful. Elastic Beanstalk manages application deployment and environment infrastructure.

B:

Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls solves the related scenario A team has Kubernetes manifests and needs managed control-plane operations; eKS manages the Kubernetes control plane while teams operate cluster workloads.

D:

Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks would address a different requirement: A service owner wants to run HTTP containers without provisioning or maintaining EC2 worker nodes. Fargate runs supported container workloads without customer-managed instances.

Question 149

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A team has Kubernetes manifests and needs managed control-plane operations. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control
  2. Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks
  3. Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform
  4. Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls. EKS manages the Kubernetes control plane while teams operate cluster workloads.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control solves the related scenario A simple static web UI must deploy globally without maintaining web servers; s3 and CloudFront deliver static assets without an always-on application server.

B:

Although Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks can be valid when A service owner wants to run HTTP containers without provisioning or maintaining EC2 worker nodes, it targets a different technical condition. Fargate runs supported container workloads without customer-managed instances.

C:

Use AWS Elastic Beanstalk with a supported Java platform would address a different requirement: A Java web app requires application environment provisioning and deployment automation without designing an ECS cluster. Elastic Beanstalk manages application deployment and environment infrastructure.

Question 150

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A simple static web UI must deploy globally without maintaining web servers. What should the architect implement?

  1. Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control
  2. Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks
  3. Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration
  4. Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks would address a different requirement: A service owner wants to run HTTP containers without provisioning or maintaining EC2 worker nodes. Fargate runs supported container workloads without customer-managed instances.

C:

This alternative, Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration, is appropriate when A workload needs short event-triggered code execution with per-invocation scale and no server provisioning. Lambda runs event handlers on demand within the service execution limits.

D:

For the separate situation A team has Kubernetes manifests and needs managed control-plane operations, Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls could be useful. EKS manages the Kubernetes control plane while teams operate cluster workloads.