mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 12

Question 110

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: Backup policies must protect resources in many accounts but recovery access should remain isolated. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults
  2. Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions
  3. Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles
  4. Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use delegated AWS Backup administration and dedicated secured backup vaults. Organization-aware backup governance can separate operational ownership from recovery safeguards.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A security account must receive selected GuardDuty and Security Hub events from member accounts, Route matching findings through EventBridge to a central event bus with explicit resource permissions could be useful. Cross-account event buses deliver security signals without granting full account access.

C:

Use CloudWatch cross-account observability and tightly scoped monitoring roles solves the related scenario Teams in different accounts need standardized metrics and log views with governed read access; cross-account observability enables centralized investigation while retaining workload-account ownership.

D:

Although Configure an organization trail and destination bucket policy with required write permissions can be valid when An organization must deliver its member accounts CloudTrail events to a security-owned bucket, it targets a different technical condition. A centrally managed trail enables common event collection across organization accounts.

Question 111

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: Finance needs to attribute shared application spend to specific departments using consistent labels. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Create AWS Budgets with account or tag filters and suitable alert thresholds
  2. Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing
  3. Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility
  4. Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing. Activated cost allocation tags allow detailed cost reports to group charges by business owner.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Create AWS Budgets with account or tag filters and suitable alert thresholds solves the related scenario Several teams want alerts before their monthly budget exceeds a departmental cap; budgets monitor actual and forecast spend against defined limits.

C:

Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility would address a different requirement: An enterprise wants to analyze spend trends and find major category anomalies across prior months. Cost Explorer summarizes recorded cost and usage trends and categories.

D:

This alternative, Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena, is appropriate when A group needs daily resource-level cost line items in a queryable analytics lake. Detailed billing exports enable granular charge analysis beyond dashboard totals.

Question 112

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A group needs daily resource-level cost line items in a queryable analytics lake. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility
  2. Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing
  3. Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena
  4. Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena. Detailed billing exports enable granular charge analysis beyond dashboard totals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility can be valid when An enterprise wants to analyze spend trends and find major category anomalies across prior months, it targets a different technical condition. Cost Explorer summarizes recorded cost and usage trends and categories.

B:

Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing would address a different requirement: Finance needs to attribute shared application spend to specific departments using consistent labels. Activated cost allocation tags allow detailed cost reports to group charges by business owner.

D:

For the separate situation A network migration needs a forward-looking estimate for a new gateway architecture before resources exist, Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer could be useful. Pricing Calculator estimates future configurations; it does not read past actual charges.

Question 113

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: Several teams want alerts before their monthly budget exceeds a departmental cap. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena
  2. Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer
  3. Create AWS Budgets with account or tag filters and suitable alert thresholds
  4. Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Create AWS Budgets with account or tag filters and suitable alert thresholds. Budgets monitor actual and forecast spend against defined limits.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena would address a different requirement: A group needs daily resource-level cost line items in a queryable analytics lake. Detailed billing exports enable granular charge analysis beyond dashboard totals.

B:

This alternative, Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer, is appropriate when A network migration needs a forward-looking estimate for a new gateway architecture before resources exist. Pricing Calculator estimates future configurations; it does not read past actual charges.

D:

Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility solves the related scenario An enterprise wants to analyze spend trends and find major category anomalies across prior months; cost Explorer summarizes recorded cost and usage trends and categories.

Question 114

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A network migration needs a forward-looking estimate for a new gateway architecture before resources exist. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena
  2. Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer
  3. Create AWS Budgets with account or tag filters and suitable alert thresholds
  4. Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer. Pricing Calculator estimates future configurations; it does not read past actual charges.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena, is appropriate when A group needs daily resource-level cost line items in a queryable analytics lake. Detailed billing exports enable granular charge analysis beyond dashboard totals.

C:

Create AWS Budgets with account or tag filters and suitable alert thresholds solves the related scenario Several teams want alerts before their monthly budget exceeds a departmental cap; budgets monitor actual and forecast spend against defined limits.

D:

Although Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing can be valid when Finance needs to attribute shared application spend to specific departments using consistent labels, it targets a different technical condition. Activated cost allocation tags allow detailed cost reports to group charges by business owner.

Question 115

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: An enterprise wants to analyze spend trends and find major category anomalies across prior months. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility
  2. Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer
  3. Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing
  4. Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use AWS Cost Explorer and optionally cost anomaly detection for historical visibility. Cost Explorer summarizes recorded cost and usage trends and categories.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Model the deployment with AWS Pricing Calculator using projected usage and transfer solves the related scenario A network migration needs a forward-looking estimate for a new gateway architecture before resources exist; pricing Calculator estimates future configurations; it does not read past actual charges.

C:

Although Enforce cost allocation tags and activate them in AWS Billing can be valid when Finance needs to attribute shared application spend to specific departments using consistent labels, it targets a different technical condition. Activated cost allocation tags allow detailed cost reports to group charges by business owner.

D:

Deliver the AWS Cost and Usage Report or Data Exports to S3 and query with Athena would address a different requirement: A group needs daily resource-level cost line items in a queryable analytics lake. Detailed billing exports enable granular charge analysis beyond dashboard totals.

Question 116

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A steady fleet of EC2 web servers runs all day with unpredictable instance-family changes. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline
  2. Prefer on-demand elastic compute with scale-to-zero where supported
  3. Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments
  4. Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline. Compute Savings Plans cover eligible compute usage flexibly across supported families and Regions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Prefer on-demand elastic compute with scale-to-zero where supported would address a different requirement: An unpredictable burst-only API sees traffic a few hours per week and cannot commit to capacity. Usage-based capacity avoids paying for unused long-term commitments.

C:

This alternative, Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments, is appropriate when A fixed EC2 instance family is used continuously in one Region and cost minimization is paramount. Narrower commitments can reduce cost when predictable usage justifies less flexibility.

D:

For the separate situation A fault-tolerant batch queue can stop and resume tasks whenever spare capacity disappears, Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries could be useful. Spot provides discount capacity with reclaim risk suited to flexible workloads.

Question 117

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A fixed EC2 instance family is used continuously in one Region and cost minimization is paramount. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline
  2. Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments
  3. Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries
  4. Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments. Narrower commitments can reduce cost when predictable usage justifies less flexibility.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline would address a different requirement: A steady fleet of EC2 web servers runs all day with unpredictable instance-family changes. Compute Savings Plans cover eligible compute usage flexibly across supported families and Regions.

C:

For the separate situation A fault-tolerant batch queue can stop and resume tasks whenever spare capacity disappears, Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries could be useful. Spot provides discount capacity with reclaim risk suited to flexible workloads.

D:

Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments solves the related scenario A running commitment is underused after migration to smaller instances; existing commitment utilization determines whether additional capacity discounts save money.

Question 118

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A fault-tolerant batch queue can stop and resume tasks whenever spare capacity disappears. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Prefer on-demand elastic compute with scale-to-zero where supported
  2. Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments
  3. Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline
  4. Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Prefer on-demand elastic compute with scale-to-zero where supported, is appropriate when An unpredictable burst-only API sees traffic a few hours per week and cannot commit to capacity. Usage-based capacity avoids paying for unused long-term commitments.

B:

For the separate situation A running commitment is underused after migration to smaller instances, Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments could be useful. Existing commitment utilization determines whether additional capacity discounts save money.

C:

Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline solves the related scenario A steady fleet of EC2 web servers runs all day with unpredictable instance-family changes; compute Savings Plans cover eligible compute usage flexibly across supported families and Regions.

Question 119

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: An unpredictable burst-only API sees traffic a few hours per week and cannot commit to capacity. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments
  2. Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments
  3. Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries
  4. Prefer on-demand elastic compute with scale-to-zero where supported

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Prefer on-demand elastic compute with scale-to-zero where supported. Usage-based capacity avoids paying for unused long-term commitments.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A running commitment is underused after migration to smaller instances, Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments could be useful. Existing commitment utilization determines whether additional capacity discounts save money.

B:

Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments solves the related scenario A fixed EC2 instance family is used continuously in one Region and cost minimization is paramount; narrower commitments can reduce cost when predictable usage justifies less flexibility.

C:

Although Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries can be valid when A fault-tolerant batch queue can stop and resume tasks whenever spare capacity disappears, it targets a different technical condition. Spot provides discount capacity with reclaim risk suited to flexible workloads.

Question 120

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A running commitment is underused after migration to smaller instances. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline
  2. Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments
  3. Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments
  4. Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Analyze coverage and utilization before purchasing more commitments. Existing commitment utilization determines whether additional capacity discounts save money.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Evaluate a Compute Savings Plan sized to the stable baseline solves the related scenario A steady fleet of EC2 web servers runs all day with unpredictable instance-family changes; compute Savings Plans cover eligible compute usage flexibly across supported families and Regions.

B:

Although Evaluate EC2 Instance Savings Plans or appropriate Reserved Instance commitments can be valid when A fixed EC2 instance family is used continuously in one Region and cost minimization is paramount, it targets a different technical condition. Narrower commitments can reduce cost when predictable usage justifies less flexibility.

D:

This alternative, Use EC2 Spot Instances with checkpointing and interruption-aware retries, is appropriate when A fault-tolerant batch queue can stop and resume tasks whenever spare capacity disappears. Spot provides discount capacity with reclaim risk suited to flexible workloads.