mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 10

Question 90

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A website requires fixed anycast ingress IPs plus health-based movement between regional ALBs. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Use AWS Global Accelerator with regional endpoint groups and health checks
  2. Use Route 53 failover records with meaningful health checks and tested DNS behavior
  3. Configure Route 53 weighted routing records for the planned traffic split
  4. Choose Route 53 geolocation routing with an explicit default record

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use AWS Global Accelerator with regional endpoint groups and health checks. Global Accelerator exposes static anycast addresses and shifts new flows to healthy endpoints.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Route 53 failover records with meaningful health checks and tested DNS behavior solves the related scenario A primary region's HTTPS endpoint fails and users must move to a healthy standby origin; failover routing selects the secondary when the primary is considered unhealthy.

C:

Although Configure Route 53 weighted routing records for the planned traffic split can be valid when A controlled new regional launch should receive approximately 5% of DNS responses before broader adoption, it targets a different technical condition. Weighted DNS records distribute answer selection by relative record weights, though client caching affects actual request fractions.

D:

Choose Route 53 geolocation routing with an explicit default record would address a different requirement: A multinational marketing site must select regional content origins using the country associated with its DNS queries. Geolocation routing selects DNS answers by estimated query origin and is not a substitute for strict end-user geofencing.

Question 91

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A company wants to isolate production workloads from sandbox administration and billing access. What should the architect implement?

  1. Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs
  2. Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units
  3. Use AWS Organizations account provisioning integrated with the standard vending process
  4. Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units. Account boundaries establish strong isolation for billing and administrative governance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs can be valid when Different subsidiaries need distinct SCP restrictions while sharing a consolidated payer, it targets a different technical condition. OU-level policies apply guardrails to descendant accounts without affecting siblings.

C:

This alternative, Use AWS Organizations account provisioning integrated with the standard vending process, is appropriate when An organization must automate creation of new AWS accounts while maintaining membership and ownership tracking. Organizations provides account hierarchy and a common consolidated billing family.

D:

For the separate situation A startup wants to centralize charge reporting without allowing one engineering team admin access to others' workloads, Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials could be useful. Consolidated billing aggregates charges while accounts maintain distinct security principals.

Question 92

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: Different subsidiaries need distinct SCP restrictions while sharing a consolidated payer. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs
  2. Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain
  3. Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials
  4. Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs. OU-level policies apply guardrails to descendant accounts without affecting siblings.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain, is appropriate when A security operator needs to know why a role with AdministratorAccess cannot perform a prohibited operation. Permission evaluation intersects organization restrictions and principal permissions.

C:

For the separate situation A startup wants to centralize charge reporting without allowing one engineering team admin access to others' workloads, Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials could be useful. Consolidated billing aggregates charges while accounts maintain distinct security principals.

D:

Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units solves the related scenario A company wants to isolate production workloads from sandbox administration and billing access; account boundaries establish strong isolation for billing and administrative governance.

Question 93

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: An organization must automate creation of new AWS accounts while maintaining membership and ownership tracking. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Use AWS Organizations account provisioning integrated with the standard vending process
  2. Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials
  3. Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs
  4. Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use AWS Organizations account provisioning integrated with the standard vending process. Organizations provides account hierarchy and a common consolidated billing family.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A startup wants to centralize charge reporting without allowing one engineering team admin access to others' workloads, Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials could be useful. Consolidated billing aggregates charges while accounts maintain distinct security principals.

C:

Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs solves the related scenario Different subsidiaries need distinct SCP restrictions while sharing a consolidated payer; oU-level policies apply guardrails to descendant accounts without affecting siblings.

D:

Although Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain can be valid when A security operator needs to know why a role with AdministratorAccess cannot perform a prohibited operation, it targets a different technical condition. Permission evaluation intersects organization restrictions and principal permissions.

Question 94

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A security operator needs to know why a role with AdministratorAccess cannot perform a prohibited operation. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units
  2. Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs
  3. Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain
  4. Use AWS Organizations account provisioning integrated with the standard vending process

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A company wants to isolate production workloads from sandbox administration and billing access, Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units could be useful. Account boundaries establish strong isolation for billing and administrative governance.

B:

Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs solves the related scenario Different subsidiaries need distinct SCP restrictions while sharing a consolidated payer; oU-level policies apply guardrails to descendant accounts without affecting siblings.

D:

Use AWS Organizations account provisioning integrated with the standard vending process would address a different requirement: An organization must automate creation of new AWS accounts while maintaining membership and ownership tracking. Organizations provides account hierarchy and a common consolidated billing family.

Question 95

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A startup wants to centralize charge reporting without allowing one engineering team admin access to others' workloads. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs
  2. Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain
  3. Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units
  4. Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use AWS Organizations consolidated billing without sharing IAM administrative credentials. Consolidated billing aggregates charges while accounts maintain distinct security principals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Organize their member accounts into separate OUs and attach scoped SCPs solves the related scenario Different subsidiaries need distinct SCP restrictions while sharing a consolidated payer; oU-level policies apply guardrails to descendant accounts without affecting siblings.

B:

Although Evaluate IAM allow, SCP, resource policy, and explicit deny in the effective permissions chain can be valid when A security operator needs to know why a role with AdministratorAccess cannot perform a prohibited operation, it targets a different technical condition. Permission evaluation intersects organization restrictions and principal permissions.

C:

Separate workloads into dedicated AWS accounts under purpose-built organizational units would address a different requirement: A company wants to isolate production workloads from sandbox administration and billing access. Account boundaries establish strong isolation for billing and administrative governance.

Question 96

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A regulated enterprise needs repeatable baseline accounts, log archive, audit roles, and guardrails. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment
  2. Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms
  3. Provision through AWS Control Tower Account Factory or its governed automation
  4. Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment. Control Tower orchestrates standardized account baselines and governance controls.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms, is appropriate when Security wants to detect deviation from required resource configuration within enrolled accounts. Detective controls evaluate drift rather than simply preventing API calls.

C:

For the separate situation A new product team needs an account with a standardized network and identity baseline, Provision through AWS Control Tower Account Factory or its governed automation could be useful. Account Factory applies managed account-creation defaults instead of hand-built foundations.

D:

Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures solves the related scenario An account created outside the standard platform violates Control Tower controls and must join governance; enrollment brings a member account under landing-zone guardrails without assuming it was originally vended.

Question 97

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: An account created outside the standard platform violates Control Tower controls and must join governance. What should the architect implement?

  1. Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures
  2. Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails
  3. Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment
  4. Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures. Enrollment brings a member account under landing-zone guardrails without assuming it was originally vended.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation Governance engineers must prevent creation of prohibited public resources in supported accounts, Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails could be useful. Preventive guardrails block unauthorized actions instead of only reporting after deployment.

C:

Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment solves the related scenario A regulated enterprise needs repeatable baseline accounts, log archive, audit roles, and guardrails; control Tower orchestrates standardized account baselines and governance controls.

D:

Although Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms can be valid when Security wants to detect deviation from required resource configuration within enrolled accounts, it targets a different technical condition. Detective controls evaluate drift rather than simply preventing API calls.

Question 98

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: Security wants to detect deviation from required resource configuration within enrolled accounts. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment
  2. Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms
  3. Provision through AWS Control Tower Account Factory or its governed automation
  4. Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms. Detective controls evaluate drift rather than simply preventing API calls.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A regulated enterprise needs repeatable baseline accounts, log archive, audit roles, and guardrails, Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment could be useful. Control Tower orchestrates standardized account baselines and governance controls.

C:

Although Provision through AWS Control Tower Account Factory or its governed automation can be valid when A new product team needs an account with a standardized network and identity baseline, it targets a different technical condition. Account Factory applies managed account-creation defaults instead of hand-built foundations.

D:

Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails would address a different requirement: Governance engineers must prevent creation of prohibited public resources in supported accounts. Preventive guardrails block unauthorized actions instead of only reporting after deployment.

Question 99

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A new product team needs an account with a standardized network and identity baseline. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms
  2. Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails
  3. Provision through AWS Control Tower Account Factory or its governed automation
  4. Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Provision through AWS Control Tower Account Factory or its governed automation. Account Factory applies managed account-creation defaults instead of hand-built foundations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms solves the related scenario Security wants to detect deviation from required resource configuration within enrolled accounts; detective controls evaluate drift rather than simply preventing API calls.

B:

Although Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails can be valid when Governance engineers must prevent creation of prohibited public resources in supported accounts, it targets a different technical condition. Preventive guardrails block unauthorized actions instead of only reporting after deployment.

D:

This alternative, Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures, is appropriate when An account created outside the standard platform violates Control Tower controls and must join governance. Enrollment brings a member account under landing-zone guardrails without assuming it was originally vended.

Question 100

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: Governance engineers must prevent creation of prohibited public resources in supported accounts. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails
  2. Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms
  3. Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment
  4. Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Apply relevant preventive controls and complementary SCP or policy guardrails. Preventive guardrails block unauthorized actions instead of only reporting after deployment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use applicable AWS Control Tower detective controls backed by supported AWS Config mechanisms would address a different requirement: Security wants to detect deviation from required resource configuration within enrolled accounts. Detective controls evaluate drift rather than simply preventing API calls.

C:

This alternative, Establish an AWS Control Tower landing zone with governed account enrollment, is appropriate when A regulated enterprise needs repeatable baseline accounts, log archive, audit roles, and guardrails. Control Tower orchestrates standardized account baselines and governance controls.

D:

For the separate situation An account created outside the standard platform violates Control Tower controls and must join governance, Enroll or register the existing account in the Control Tower landing zone using supported procedures could be useful. Enrollment brings a member account under landing-zone guardrails without assuming it was originally vended.