mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 39

Question 380

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: Finance wants to compare actual spend against the same application's projected baseline. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Contrast cost reports against approved AWS Pricing Calculator assumptions and utilization measurements
  2. Enforce a standard activated cost allocation tag and report untagged assets
  3. Verify Cost Explorer account and charge-type filters before concluding savings occurred
  4. Query Cost and Usage Report usage-type line items for transfer categories and accounts

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Contrast cost reports against approved AWS Pricing Calculator assumptions and utilization measurements. Reconciling billed usage with forecast assumptions explains cost variances.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Enforce a standard activated cost allocation tag and report untagged assets, is appropriate when A development team claims its spend cannot be assigned because application names differ across resources. Consistent activated tags allow cost attribution across otherwise disparate services.

C:

For the separate situation A cost dashboard suddenly reports lower spend because a new linked account was excluded, Verify Cost Explorer account and charge-type filters before concluding savings occurred could be useful. Reporting scope changes can mimic genuine changes in resource consumption.

D:

Query Cost and Usage Report usage-type line items for transfer categories and accounts solves the related scenario A monthly invoice shows unexplained data transfer growth that Cost Explorer groups too broadly; cUR provides usage dimensions needed for granular charge-root-cause investigation.

Question 381

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A fleet of m-family EC2 instances reports 8% CPU and low memory usage for months. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more
  2. Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families
  3. Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling
  4. Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families. Compute Optimizer suggests potential rightsizing based on utilization telemetry.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An organization purchases new EC2 reservations despite holding underused reservations after a migration, Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more could be useful. Overlapping commitments can increase cost when eligible usage is insufficient.

C:

Although Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling can be valid when An overprovisioned ECS service always maintains 60 tasks despite single-digit utilization, it targets a different technical condition. Lower baseline desired capacity reduces paid idle compute while retaining failover margins.

D:

Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries would address a different requirement: A fault-tolerant batch service runs entirely on full-price On-Demand capacity with flexible deadlines. Spare-capacity pricing reduces cost when the workload tolerates termination.

Question 382

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A test environment runs EC2 instances all weekend with no traffic. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more
  2. Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families
  3. Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries
  4. Schedule instance shutdown during approved idle windows and preserve restart automation

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Schedule instance shutdown during approved idle windows and preserve restart automation. Turning off idle eligible compute removes avoidable instance-hours.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more solves the related scenario An organization purchases new EC2 reservations despite holding underused reservations after a migration; overlapping commitments can increase cost when eligible usage is insufficient.

B:

Although Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families can be valid when A fleet of m-family EC2 instances reports 8% CPU and low memory usage for months, it targets a different technical condition. Compute Optimizer suggests potential rightsizing based on utilization telemetry.

C:

Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries would address a different requirement: A fault-tolerant batch service runs entirely on full-price On-Demand capacity with flexible deadlines. Spare-capacity pricing reduces cost when the workload tolerates termination.

Question 383

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A fault-tolerant batch service runs entirely on full-price On-Demand capacity with flexible deadlines. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families
  2. Schedule instance shutdown during approved idle windows and preserve restart automation
  3. Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries
  4. Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries. Spare-capacity pricing reduces cost when the workload tolerates termination.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families can be valid when A fleet of m-family EC2 instances reports 8% CPU and low memory usage for months, it targets a different technical condition. Compute Optimizer suggests potential rightsizing based on utilization telemetry.

B:

Schedule instance shutdown during approved idle windows and preserve restart automation would address a different requirement: A test environment runs EC2 instances all weekend with no traffic. Turning off idle eligible compute removes avoidable instance-hours.

D:

For the separate situation An overprovisioned ECS service always maintains 60 tasks despite single-digit utilization, Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling could be useful. Lower baseline desired capacity reduces paid idle compute while retaining failover margins.

Question 384

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: An organization purchases new EC2 reservations despite holding underused reservations after a migration. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries
  2. Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling
  3. Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more
  4. Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more. Overlapping commitments can increase cost when eligible usage is insufficient.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries would address a different requirement: A fault-tolerant batch service runs entirely on full-price On-Demand capacity with flexible deadlines. Spare-capacity pricing reduces cost when the workload tolerates termination.

B:

This alternative, Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling, is appropriate when An overprovisioned ECS service always maintains 60 tasks despite single-digit utilization. Lower baseline desired capacity reduces paid idle compute while retaining failover margins.

D:

Use Compute Optimizer recommendations and benchmark smaller instance families solves the related scenario A fleet of m-family EC2 instances reports 8% CPU and low memory usage for months; compute Optimizer suggests potential rightsizing based on utilization telemetry.

Question 385

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: An overprovisioned ECS service always maintains 60 tasks despite single-digit utilization. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more
  2. Schedule instance shutdown during approved idle windows and preserve restart automation
  3. Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling
  4. Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Reduce the minimum task count and implement appropriate utilization-based autoscaling. Lower baseline desired capacity reduces paid idle compute while retaining failover margins.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Audit RI and Savings Plans utilization and coverage before committing more, is appropriate when An organization purchases new EC2 reservations despite holding underused reservations after a migration. Overlapping commitments can increase cost when eligible usage is insufficient.

B:

For the separate situation A test environment runs EC2 instances all weekend with no traffic, Schedule instance shutdown during approved idle windows and preserve restart automation could be useful. Turning off idle eligible compute removes avoidable instance-hours.

D:

Although Shift interruption-tolerant workers to Spot with checkpointing and retries can be valid when A fault-tolerant batch service runs entirely on full-price On-Demand capacity with flexible deadlines, it targets a different technical condition. Spare-capacity pricing reduces cost when the workload tolerates termination.

Question 386

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A test stack leaves behind dozens of unattached EBS volumes after CloudFormation removal. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage
  2. Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy
  3. Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints
  4. Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks. Unattached EBS volumes incur storage charges while no workload is using them.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage solves the related scenario A team stores 50 GB of rarely used backups in expensive provisioned EC2 instance disks; durable shared backup services separate retention needs from high-cost always-mounted compute storage.

B:

Although Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy can be valid when A bucket retains noncurrent versions of frequently updated transient logs indefinitely, it targets a different technical condition. Versioned-object history consumes storage until lifecycle cleanup or manual deletion.

C:

Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints would address a different requirement: An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.

Question 387

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A bucket retains noncurrent versions of frequently updated transient logs indefinitely. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy
  2. Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class
  3. Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints
  4. Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class would address a different requirement: Several EFS file systems contain mostly old, rarely opened data but use the highest-cost class. EFS lifecycle reduces storage costs for infrequently accessed files within its supported tiers.

C:

This alternative, Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints, is appropriate when An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.

D:

For the separate situation A team stores 50 GB of rarely used backups in expensive provisioned EC2 instance disks, Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage could be useful. Durable shared backup services separate retention needs from high-cost always-mounted compute storage.

Question 388

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: Several EFS file systems contain mostly old, rarely opened data but use the highest-cost class. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class
  2. Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy
  3. Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints
  4. Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class. EFS lifecycle reduces storage costs for infrequently accessed files within its supported tiers.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy, is appropriate when A bucket retains noncurrent versions of frequently updated transient logs indefinitely. Versioned-object history consumes storage until lifecycle cleanup or manual deletion.

C:

For the separate situation An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges, Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints could be useful. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.

D:

Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks solves the related scenario A test stack leaves behind dozens of unattached EBS volumes after CloudFormation removal; unattached EBS volumes incur storage charges while no workload is using them.

Question 389

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges. What should the architect implement?

  1. Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints
  2. Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage
  3. Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks
  4. Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A team stores 50 GB of rarely used backups in expensive provisioned EC2 instance disks, Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage could be useful. Durable shared backup services separate retention needs from high-cost always-mounted compute storage.

C:

Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks solves the related scenario A test stack leaves behind dozens of unattached EBS volumes after CloudFormation removal; unattached EBS volumes incur storage charges while no workload is using them.

D:

Although Set lifecycle rules to expire old noncurrent versions subject to retention policy can be valid when A bucket retains noncurrent versions of frequently updated transient logs indefinitely, it targets a different technical condition. Versioned-object history consumes storage until lifecycle cleanup or manual deletion.

Question 390

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A team stores 50 GB of rarely used backups in expensive provisioned EC2 instance disks. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks
  2. Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class
  3. Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage
  4. Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage. Durable shared backup services separate retention needs from high-cost always-mounted compute storage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A test stack leaves behind dozens of unattached EBS volumes after CloudFormation removal, Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks could be useful. Unattached EBS volumes incur storage charges while no workload is using them.

B:

Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class solves the related scenario Several EFS file systems contain mostly old, rarely opened data but use the highest-cost class; eFS lifecycle reduces storage costs for infrequently accessed files within its supported tiers.

D:

Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints would address a different requirement: An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.