mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 37

Question 360

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A queue depth scales consumers only after processing lag exceeds a business SLA. What should the architect implement?

  1. Tune predictive or target-tracking scaling metrics using message age and arrival patterns
  2. Model and request appropriate Lambda concurrency capacity while protecting downstream limits
  3. Expand subnet CIDR capacity and plan ENI/IP requirements for task scaling
  4. Introduce RDS Proxy or bounded client pooling with safe concurrency limits

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Tune predictive or target-tracking scaling metrics using message age and arrival patterns. Queue-age signals make capacity decisions sensitive to processing delay.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A high-traffic service expects thousands of Lambda invocations but unexpectedly hits regional concurrency throttling, Model and request appropriate Lambda concurrency capacity while protecting downstream limits could be useful. Concurrency quotas can cap execution independently of workload demand.

C:

Expand subnet CIDR capacity and plan ENI/IP requirements for task scaling solves the related scenario A production ECS service cannot launch enough tasks because the VPC subnets run out of IPs; container network interfaces consume address capacity during elastic scale-out.

D:

Although Introduce RDS Proxy or bounded client pooling with safe concurrency limits can be valid when An RDS connection storm overwhelms the writer after many Lambda functions scale out, it targets a different technical condition. Database connection pools protect the backend from bursty client creation.

Question 361

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A multi-region S3 disaster-recovery plan assumes replication is instantaneous for every object. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery
  2. Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes
  3. Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag
  4. Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag. S3 replication can be delayed and does not guarantee zero-lag copies.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery solves the related scenario An Aurora Global Database failover requires choosing a new primary region and replaying the application write path; global replication and writer relocation require controlled failover procedures.

B:

Although Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes can be valid when An SQS consumer acknowledges a job before committing its database transaction, then crashes, it targets a different technical condition. Early deletion risks losing unfinished work even though the queue is durable.

D:

This alternative, Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported, is appropriate when A critical DynamoDB read after a write uses an eventually consistent read and returns the prior value. Strongly consistent table reads can avoid stale values after committed writes in a Region.

Question 362

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: An RDS read replica is promoted after a writer outage but a few committed writes are missing. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery
  2. Account for asynchronous replica lag in writer promotion and application recovery
  3. Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes
  4. Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Account for asynchronous replica lag in writer promotion and application recovery. Read-replica promotion can lose writes that were not replicated before failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery can be valid when An Aurora Global Database failover requires choosing a new primary region and replaying the application write path, it targets a different technical condition. Global replication and writer relocation require controlled failover procedures.

C:

This alternative, Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes, is appropriate when An SQS consumer acknowledges a job before committing its database transaction, then crashes. Early deletion risks losing unfinished work even though the queue is durable.

D:

For the separate situation A multi-region S3 disaster-recovery plan assumes replication is instantaneous for every object, Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag could be useful. S3 replication can be delayed and does not guarantee zero-lag copies.

Question 363

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: An Aurora Global Database failover requires choosing a new primary region and replaying the application write path. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported
  2. Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery
  3. Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag
  4. Account for asynchronous replica lag in writer promotion and application recovery

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery. Global replication and writer relocation require controlled failover procedures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported would address a different requirement: A critical DynamoDB read after a write uses an eventually consistent read and returns the prior value. Strongly consistent table reads can avoid stale values after committed writes in a Region.

C:

For the separate situation A multi-region S3 disaster-recovery plan assumes replication is instantaneous for every object, Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag could be useful. S3 replication can be delayed and does not guarantee zero-lag copies.

D:

Account for asynchronous replica lag in writer promotion and application recovery solves the related scenario An RDS read replica is promoted after a writer outage but a few committed writes are missing; read-replica promotion can lose writes that were not replicated before failure.

Question 364

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: An SQS consumer acknowledges a job before committing its database transaction, then crashes. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag
  2. Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes
  3. Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery
  4. Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes. Early deletion risks losing unfinished work even though the queue is durable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Monitor S3 replication metrics and define an RPO that tolerates actual asynchronous lag, is appropriate when A multi-region S3 disaster-recovery plan assumes replication is instantaneous for every object. S3 replication can be delayed and does not guarantee zero-lag copies.

C:

Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery solves the related scenario An Aurora Global Database failover requires choosing a new primary region and replaying the application write path; global replication and writer relocation require controlled failover procedures.

D:

Although Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported can be valid when A critical DynamoDB read after a write uses an eventually consistent read and returns the prior value, it targets a different technical condition. Strongly consistent table reads can avoid stale values after committed writes in a Region.

Question 365

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A critical DynamoDB read after a write uses an eventually consistent read and returns the prior value. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery
  2. Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes
  3. Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported
  4. Account for asynchronous replica lag in writer promotion and application recovery

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use strongly consistent reads in the same-region table where supported. Strongly consistent table reads can avoid stale values after committed writes in a Region.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An Aurora Global Database failover requires choosing a new primary region and replaying the application write path, Document and rehearse write endpoint updates and conflict-aware regional recovery could be useful. Global replication and writer relocation require controlled failover procedures.

B:

Delete the SQS message only after durable idempotent processing completes solves the related scenario An SQS consumer acknowledges a job before committing its database transaction, then crashes; early deletion risks losing unfinished work even though the queue is durable.

D:

Account for asynchronous replica lag in writer promotion and application recovery would address a different requirement: An RDS read replica is promoted after a writer outage but a few committed writes are missing. Read-replica promotion can lose writes that were not replicated before failure.

Question 366

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A Route 53 failover health check tests a static home page but misses failed checkout transactions. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records
  2. Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback
  3. Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence
  4. Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures. A shallow endpoint can appear healthy while essential application behavior is broken.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records can be valid when An application uses latency routing without checking health and sends users to a failed low-latency Region, it targets a different technical condition. Health-aware latency routing avoids selecting an unavailable low-latency target.

B:

Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback would address a different requirement: A disaster-recovery design publishes two Regions but both depend on the same sole corporate identity server. Multi-region compute cannot compensate for a shared unavailable authentication dependency.

C:

This alternative, Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence, is appropriate when A regional active-passive design fails over only after DNS caches retain the old answer too long. DNS propagation and client caching affect real failover duration.

Question 367

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A regional active-passive design fails over only after DNS caches retain the old answer too long. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence
  2. Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback
  3. Add gateway VPC endpoints and AZ-resilient network routes for AWS dependencies
  4. Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence. DNS propagation and client caching affect real failover duration.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback, is appropriate when A disaster-recovery design publishes two Regions but both depend on the same sole corporate identity server. Multi-region compute cannot compensate for a shared unavailable authentication dependency.

C:

For the separate situation An EC2-backed application survives AZ failure but S3 access fails because route tables point through a dead NAT gateway, Add gateway VPC endpoints and AZ-resilient network routes for AWS dependencies could be useful. Endpoint paths remove a fragile zonal NAT dependency from regional S3 access.

D:

Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records solves the related scenario An application uses latency routing without checking health and sends users to a failed low-latency Region; health-aware latency routing avoids selecting an unavailable low-latency target.

Question 368

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: An EC2-backed application survives AZ failure but S3 access fails because route tables point through a dead NAT gateway. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures
  2. Add gateway VPC endpoints and AZ-resilient network routes for AWS dependencies
  3. Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence
  4. Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Add gateway VPC endpoints and AZ-resilient network routes for AWS dependencies. Endpoint paths remove a fragile zonal NAT dependency from regional S3 access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures, is appropriate when A Route 53 failover health check tests a static home page but misses failed checkout transactions. A shallow endpoint can appear healthy while essential application behavior is broken.

C:

Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence solves the related scenario A regional active-passive design fails over only after DNS caches retain the old answer too long; dNS propagation and client caching affect real failover duration.

D:

Although Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records can be valid when An application uses latency routing without checking health and sends users to a failed low-latency Region, it targets a different technical condition. Health-aware latency routing avoids selecting an unavailable low-latency target.

Question 369

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: An application uses latency routing without checking health and sends users to a failed low-latency Region. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records
  2. Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence
  3. Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback
  4. Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records. Health-aware latency routing avoids selecting an unavailable low-latency target.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Review DNS TTLs, health-check recovery times and client connection persistence solves the related scenario A regional active-passive design fails over only after DNS caches retain the old answer too long; dNS propagation and client caching affect real failover duration.

C:

Although Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback can be valid when A disaster-recovery design publishes two Regions but both depend on the same sole corporate identity server, it targets a different technical condition. Multi-region compute cannot compensate for a shared unavailable authentication dependency.

D:

Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures would address a different requirement: A Route 53 failover health check tests a static home page but misses failed checkout transactions. A shallow endpoint can appear healthy while essential application behavior is broken.

Question 370

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A disaster-recovery design publishes two Regions but both depend on the same sole corporate identity server. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records
  2. Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures
  3. Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback
  4. Add gateway VPC endpoints and AZ-resilient network routes for AWS dependencies

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Remove the shared identity single point with resilient federated access and tested fallback. Multi-region compute cannot compensate for a shared unavailable authentication dependency.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Add meaningful endpoint health checks to regional Route 53 latency records solves the related scenario An application uses latency routing without checking health and sends users to a failed low-latency Region; health-aware latency routing avoids selecting an unavailable low-latency target.

B:

Although Probe a representative application transaction endpoint and alert on business failures can be valid when A Route 53 failover health check tests a static home page but misses failed checkout transactions, it targets a different technical condition. A shallow endpoint can appear healthy while essential application behavior is broken.

D:

This alternative, Add gateway VPC endpoints and AZ-resilient network routes for AWS dependencies, is appropriate when An EC2-backed application survives AZ failure but S3 access fails because route tables point through a dead NAT gateway. Endpoint paths remove a fragile zonal NAT dependency from regional S3 access.