mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 40

Question 390

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A team stores 50 GB of rarely used backups in expensive provisioned EC2 instance disks. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks
  2. Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class
  3. Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage
  4. Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage. Durable shared backup services separate retention needs from high-cost always-mounted compute storage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A test stack leaves behind dozens of unattached EBS volumes after CloudFormation removal, Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks could be useful. Unattached EBS volumes incur storage charges while no workload is using them.

B:

Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class solves the related scenario Several EFS file systems contain mostly old, rarely opened data but use the highest-cost class; eFS lifecycle reduces storage costs for infrequently accessed files within its supported tiers.

D:

Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints would address a different requirement: An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.

Question 391

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A VPC routes all S3 data copies through one charged NAT gateway. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint
  2. Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover
  3. Deliver static assets via S3 and CloudFront instead of forwarding through the API servers
  4. Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover would address a different requirement: A chatty stateful service performs thousands of cross-AZ remote procedure calls for each transaction. Cross-AZ bandwidth charges grow with unnecessary synchronous request chatter.

C:

This alternative, Deliver static assets via S3 and CloudFront instead of forwarding through the API servers, is appropriate when A regional API proxies all downloadable image assets through expensive EC2 instances. Object-plus-CDN delivery lowers application fleet egress and repeated processing.

D:

For the separate situation A hybrid design routes internet-bound traffic over Direct Connect for an application that could use local ISP egress, Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning could be useful. Private-network routing can add expense without meeting a concrete security or latency need.

Question 392

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A chatty stateful service performs thousands of cross-AZ remote procedure calls for each transaction. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover
  2. Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication
  3. Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning
  4. Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover. Cross-AZ bandwidth charges grow with unnecessary synchronous request chatter.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication, is appropriate when A workload copies terabytes daily across Regions although a weekly consolidated dataset would suffice. Transferred-byte volume directly affects inter-Region network charges.

C:

For the separate situation A hybrid design routes internet-bound traffic over Direct Connect for an application that could use local ISP egress, Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning could be useful. Private-network routing can add expense without meeting a concrete security or latency need.

D:

Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint solves the related scenario A VPC routes all S3 data copies through one charged NAT gateway; gateway endpoint routing eliminates avoidable NAT processing for S3 traffic.

Question 393

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A regional API proxies all downloadable image assets through expensive EC2 instances. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning
  2. Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover
  3. Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication
  4. Deliver static assets via S3 and CloudFront instead of forwarding through the API servers

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Deliver static assets via S3 and CloudFront instead of forwarding through the API servers. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning, is appropriate when A hybrid design routes internet-bound traffic over Direct Connect for an application that could use local ISP egress. Private-network routing can add expense without meeting a concrete security or latency need.

B:

For the separate situation A chatty stateful service performs thousands of cross-AZ remote procedure calls for each transaction, Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover could be useful. Cross-AZ bandwidth charges grow with unnecessary synchronous request chatter.

C:

Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication solves the related scenario A workload copies terabytes daily across Regions although a weekly consolidated dataset would suffice; transferred-byte volume directly affects inter-Region network charges.

Question 394

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A workload copies terabytes daily across Regions although a weekly consolidated dataset would suffice. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication
  2. Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint
  3. Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover
  4. Deliver static assets via S3 and CloudFront instead of forwarding through the API servers

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication. Transferred-byte volume directly affects inter-Region network charges.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint solves the related scenario A VPC routes all S3 data copies through one charged NAT gateway; gateway endpoint routing eliminates avoidable NAT processing for S3 traffic.

C:

Although Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover can be valid when A chatty stateful service performs thousands of cross-AZ remote procedure calls for each transaction, it targets a different technical condition. Cross-AZ bandwidth charges grow with unnecessary synchronous request chatter.

D:

Deliver static assets via S3 and CloudFront instead of forwarding through the API servers would address a different requirement: A regional API proxies all downloadable image assets through expensive EC2 instances. Object-plus-CDN delivery lowers application fleet egress and repeated processing.

Question 395

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A hybrid design routes internet-bound traffic over Direct Connect for an application that could use local ISP egress. What should the architect implement?

  1. Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover
  2. Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication
  3. Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint
  4. Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Measure Direct Connect port and data transfer costs against security requirements before hairpinning. Private-network routing can add expense without meeting a concrete security or latency need.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Reduce cross-AZ call volume through locality and batching without removing required failover solves the related scenario A chatty stateful service performs thousands of cross-AZ remote procedure calls for each transaction; cross-AZ bandwidth charges grow with unnecessary synchronous request chatter.

B:

Although Batch and compress cross-Region transfers and avoid unnecessary continuous replication can be valid when A workload copies terabytes daily across Regions although a weekly consolidated dataset would suffice, it targets a different technical condition. Transferred-byte volume directly affects inter-Region network charges.

C:

Move eligible S3 API routes to a gateway VPC endpoint would address a different requirement: A VPC routes all S3 data copies through one charged NAT gateway. Gateway endpoint routing eliminates avoidable NAT processing for S3 traffic.

Question 396

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A product owner wants forecast-based warning before an AWS account exceeds its monthly budget. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options
  2. Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope
  3. Configure a scoped AWS Budget with appropriate notification destinations
  4. Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope. Forecast alerts flag expected overruns before final charges post.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options would address a different requirement: A critical database has one-year reserved capacity that will expire next week. Renewal should reflect forecasted database utilization rather than blindly copying prior capacity.

C:

For the separate situation A cloud team needs automated finance notification when a new service exceeds a daily limit, Configure a scoped AWS Budget with appropriate notification destinations could be useful. Budget alerts translate threshold breaches into responsible owner communication.

D:

Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan solves the related scenario An organization has steady eligible EC2 and Fargate spend but no capacity commitments; flexible compute commitment discounts can cover stable eligible usage across platforms.

Question 397

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: An organization has steady eligible EC2 and Fargate spend but no capacity commitments. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines
  2. Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan
  3. Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope
  4. Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan. Flexible compute commitment discounts can cover stable eligible usage across platforms.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines, is appropriate when An executive wants quarterly optimization proof rather than anecdotal reduction claims. Cost efficiency requires comparing consistent workload output and time windows.

C:

Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope solves the related scenario A product owner wants forecast-based warning before an AWS account exceeds its monthly budget; forecast alerts flag expected overruns before final charges post.

D:

Although Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options can be valid when A critical database has one-year reserved capacity that will expire next week, it targets a different technical condition. Renewal should reflect forecasted database utilization rather than blindly copying prior capacity.

Question 398

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A critical database has one-year reserved capacity that will expire next week. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope
  2. Configure a scoped AWS Budget with appropriate notification destinations
  3. Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options
  4. Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options. Renewal should reflect forecasted database utilization rather than blindly copying prior capacity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A product owner wants forecast-based warning before an AWS account exceeds its monthly budget, Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope could be useful. Forecast alerts flag expected overruns before final charges post.

B:

Configure a scoped AWS Budget with appropriate notification destinations solves the related scenario A cloud team needs automated finance notification when a new service exceeds a daily limit; budget alerts translate threshold breaches into responsible owner communication.

D:

Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines would address a different requirement: An executive wants quarterly optimization proof rather than anecdotal reduction claims. Cost efficiency requires comparing consistent workload output and time windows.

Question 399

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A cloud team needs automated finance notification when a new service exceeds a daily limit. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options
  2. Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines
  3. Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan
  4. Configure a scoped AWS Budget with appropriate notification destinations

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure a scoped AWS Budget with appropriate notification destinations. Budget alerts translate threshold breaches into responsible owner communication.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options solves the related scenario A critical database has one-year reserved capacity that will expire next week; renewal should reflect forecasted database utilization rather than blindly copying prior capacity.

B:

Although Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines can be valid when An executive wants quarterly optimization proof rather than anecdotal reduction claims, it targets a different technical condition. Cost efficiency requires comparing consistent workload output and time windows.

C:

Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan would address a different requirement: An organization has steady eligible EC2 and Fargate spend but no capacity commitments. Flexible compute commitment discounts can cover stable eligible usage across platforms.

Question 400

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: An executive wants quarterly optimization proof rather than anecdotal reduction claims. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options
  2. Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines
  3. Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope
  4. Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Track normalized service usage, unit costs and savings against established baselines. Cost efficiency requires comparing consistent workload output and time windows.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Model future database demand and evaluate appropriate renewal commitment options can be valid when A critical database has one-year reserved capacity that will expire next week, it targets a different technical condition. Renewal should reflect forecasted database utilization rather than blindly copying prior capacity.

C:

This alternative, Use AWS Budgets forecast alerts filtered to the required scope, is appropriate when A product owner wants forecast-based warning before an AWS account exceeds its monthly budget. Forecast alerts flag expected overruns before final charges post.

D:

For the separate situation An organization has steady eligible EC2 and Fargate spend but no capacity commitments, Analyze baseline usage and evaluate an appropriately sized Compute Savings Plan could be useful. Flexible compute commitment discounts can cover stable eligible usage across platforms.