Question 390
A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A team stores 50 GB of rarely used backups in expensive provisioned EC2 instance disks. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Move appropriate persistent backups to lifecycle-managed S3 or AWS Backup storage. Durable shared backup services separate retention needs from high-cost always-mounted compute storage.
Incorrect Answers
For the separate situation A test stack leaves behind dozens of unattached EBS volumes after CloudFormation removal, Find detached volumes and remove or archive them after ownership and retention checks could be useful. Unattached EBS volumes incur storage charges while no workload is using them.
Enable appropriate EFS lifecycle management to move cold files to a lower-cost storage class solves the related scenario Several EFS file systems contain mostly old, rarely opened data but use the highest-cost class; eFS lifecycle reduces storage costs for infrequently accessed files within its supported tiers.
Recalculate lifecycle timing against each storage class's minimum duration constraints would address a different requirement: An S3 archival design ignores minimum storage duration and early deletion charges. Premature archival deletes can erase projected savings through minimum duration billing.