mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 16

Question 150

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A simple static web UI must deploy globally without maintaining web servers. What should the architect implement?

  1. Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control
  2. Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks
  3. Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration
  4. Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Serve versioned static assets through S3 behind CloudFront with origin access control. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Amazon ECS on AWS Fargate with appropriately sized tasks would address a different requirement: A service owner wants to run HTTP containers without provisioning or maintaining EC2 worker nodes. Fargate runs supported container workloads without customer-managed instances.

C:

This alternative, Implement AWS Lambda with appropriate concurrency and event-source configuration, is appropriate when A workload needs short event-triggered code execution with per-invocation scale and no server provisioning. Lambda runs event handlers on demand within the service execution limits.

D:

For the separate situation A team has Kubernetes manifests and needs managed control-plane operations, Deploy Amazon EKS with appropriate worker capacity and identity controls could be useful. EKS manages the Kubernetes control plane while teams operate cluster workloads.

Question 151

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: Hundreds of EC2 instances need a periodic approved patch installation schedule and reporting. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances
  2. Enable Systems Manager Inventory collection and reporting
  3. Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions
  4. Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances, is appropriate when Operators need to execute a one-time shell command on a fleet without opening inbound SSH. Run Command executes managed remote commands through the SSM control plane.

B:

For the separate situation A team must inventory installed applications and operating system configuration across managed servers, Enable Systems Manager Inventory collection and reporting could be useful. Inventory collects structured managed-node configuration data for audit and operations.

C:

Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions solves the related scenario A compliance policy needs to enforce and report target settings across managed fleet instances; state Manager periodically applies and reports configured management associations.

Question 152

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: Operators need to execute a one-time shell command on a fleet without opening inbound SSH. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances
  2. Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps
  3. Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions
  4. Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances. Run Command executes managed remote commands through the SSM control plane.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps solves the related scenario A database migration requires a multi-step approval, snapshot, and cutover runbook; automation documents orchestrate repeatable operations including approval and recovery actions.

C:

Although Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions can be valid when A compliance policy needs to enforce and report target settings across managed fleet instances, it targets a different technical condition. State Manager periodically applies and reports configured management associations.

D:

Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes would address a different requirement: Hundreds of EC2 instances need a periodic approved patch installation schedule and reporting. Patch Manager automates patch assessment and installation with maintenance controls.

Question 153

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A team must inventory installed applications and operating system configuration across managed servers. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions
  2. Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances
  3. Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps
  4. Enable Systems Manager Inventory collection and reporting

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Enable Systems Manager Inventory collection and reporting. Inventory collects structured managed-node configuration data for audit and operations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions solves the related scenario A compliance policy needs to enforce and report target settings across managed fleet instances; state Manager periodically applies and reports configured management associations.

B:

Although Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances can be valid when Operators need to execute a one-time shell command on a fleet without opening inbound SSH, it targets a different technical condition. Run Command executes managed remote commands through the SSM control plane.

C:

Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps would address a different requirement: A database migration requires a multi-step approval, snapshot, and cutover runbook. Automation documents orchestrate repeatable operations including approval and recovery actions.

Question 154

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A database migration requires a multi-step approval, snapshot, and cutover runbook. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes
  2. Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances
  3. Enable Systems Manager Inventory collection and reporting
  4. Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps. Automation documents orchestrate repeatable operations including approval and recovery actions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes can be valid when Hundreds of EC2 instances need a periodic approved patch installation schedule and reporting, it targets a different technical condition. Patch Manager automates patch assessment and installation with maintenance controls.

B:

Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances would address a different requirement: Operators need to execute a one-time shell command on a fleet without opening inbound SSH. Run Command executes managed remote commands through the SSM control plane.

C:

This alternative, Enable Systems Manager Inventory collection and reporting, is appropriate when A team must inventory installed applications and operating system configuration across managed servers. Inventory collects structured managed-node configuration data for audit and operations.

Question 155

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A compliance policy needs to enforce and report target settings across managed fleet instances. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances
  2. Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps
  3. Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions
  4. Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure Systems Manager State Manager associations for desired-state actions. State Manager periodically applies and reports configured management associations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Run an authorized Systems Manager Run Command document against managed instances would address a different requirement: Operators need to execute a one-time shell command on a fleet without opening inbound SSH. Run Command executes managed remote commands through the SSM control plane.

B:

This alternative, Build a Systems Manager Automation document with controlled execution steps, is appropriate when A database migration requires a multi-step approval, snapshot, and cutover runbook. Automation documents orchestrate repeatable operations including approval and recovery actions.

D:

Configure Systems Manager Patch Manager policies for targeted managed nodes solves the related scenario Hundreds of EC2 instances need a periodic approved patch installation schedule and reporting; patch Manager automates patch assessment and installation with maintenance controls.

Question 156

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A regional database must survive one Availability Zone failure with minimal loss of committed data. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations
  2. Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover
  3. Deploy Aurora Global Database and rehearse global failover
  4. Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover. Synchronous AZ standby reduces loss from a single-AZ outage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A global key-value service must accept local writes in two regions and resolve replication conflicts, Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations could be useful. Global tables provide multi-Region multi-active asynchronous replication.

C:

Although Deploy Aurora Global Database and rehearse global failover can be valid when An Aurora cluster needs fast cross-Region disaster recovery but writes remain in the primary Region, it targets a different technical condition. Storage-based cross-Region replication prepares a second writer location.

D:

Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it would address a different requirement: A read-heavy online shop needs a cross-Region read copy and can tolerate lag. Asynchronous read replicas serve read traffic but may lag behind the writer.

Question 157

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A read-heavy online shop needs a cross-Region read copy and can tolerate lag. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions
  2. Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover
  3. Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it
  4. Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it. Asynchronous read replicas serve read traffic but may lag behind the writer.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions solves the related scenario A destination S3 bucket must receive asynchronously replicated source object versions in another Region; s3 replication copies eligible versions asynchronously to the destination bucket.

B:

Although Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover can be valid when A regional database must survive one Availability Zone failure with minimal loss of committed data, it targets a different technical condition. Synchronous AZ standby reduces loss from a single-AZ outage.

D:

This alternative, Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations, is appropriate when A global key-value service must accept local writes in two regions and resolve replication conflicts. Global tables provide multi-Region multi-active asynchronous replication.

Question 158

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A global key-value service must accept local writes in two regions and resolve replication conflicts. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover
  2. Deploy Aurora Global Database and rehearse global failover
  3. Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations
  4. Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations. Global tables provide multi-Region multi-active asynchronous replication.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover can be valid when A regional database must survive one Availability Zone failure with minimal loss of committed data, it targets a different technical condition. Synchronous AZ standby reduces loss from a single-AZ outage.

B:

Deploy Aurora Global Database and rehearse global failover would address a different requirement: An Aurora cluster needs fast cross-Region disaster recovery but writes remain in the primary Region. Storage-based cross-Region replication prepares a second writer location.

D:

For the separate situation A destination S3 bucket must receive asynchronously replicated source object versions in another Region, Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions could be useful. S3 replication copies eligible versions asynchronously to the destination bucket.

Question 159

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: An Aurora cluster needs fast cross-Region disaster recovery but writes remain in the primary Region. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations
  2. Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions
  3. Deploy Aurora Global Database and rehearse global failover
  4. Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Deploy Aurora Global Database and rehearse global failover. Storage-based cross-Region replication prepares a second writer location.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations would address a different requirement: A global key-value service must accept local writes in two regions and resolve replication conflicts. Global tables provide multi-Region multi-active asynchronous replication.

B:

This alternative, Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions, is appropriate when A destination S3 bucket must receive asynchronously replicated source object versions in another Region. S3 replication copies eligible versions asynchronously to the destination bucket.

D:

Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it solves the related scenario A read-heavy online shop needs a cross-Region read copy and can tolerate lag; asynchronous read replicas serve read traffic but may lag behind the writer.

Question 160

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A destination S3 bucket must receive asynchronously replicated source object versions in another Region. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations
  2. Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover
  3. Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it
  4. Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure S3 Cross-Region Replication with versioning and IAM permissions. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Select DynamoDB global tables with explicit application conflict expectations, is appropriate when A global key-value service must accept local writes in two regions and resolve replication conflicts. Global tables provide multi-Region multi-active asynchronous replication.

B:

For the separate situation A regional database must survive one Availability Zone failure with minimal loss of committed data, Use an RDS Multi-AZ standby arrangement with managed failover could be useful. Synchronous AZ standby reduces loss from a single-AZ outage.

C:

Use an appropriate RDS cross-Region read replica and direct reads to it solves the related scenario A read-heavy online shop needs a cross-Region read copy and can tolerate lag; asynchronous read replicas serve read traffic but may lag behind the writer.