Question 180
During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that IT investments proceed without board-approved risk appetite or strategic priorities. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. Which follow-up result would BEST substantiate that the remediation operates effectively?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Correct. Documented business sponsorship, explicit decision authority and governance reporting link IT choices to approved objectives and risk appetite. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that IT investments proceed without board-approved risk appetite or strategic priorities. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.
Incorrect Answers
Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.
Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.
Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.