mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 46

Question 450

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A migration requires workloads to access a corporate IdP when a Direct Connect circuit fails. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration
  2. Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment
  3. Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials
  4. Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure. Authentication availability is part of the recovery path for migrated services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration can be valid when A migrated application previously used Active Directory integrated authentication for file shares, it targets a different technical condition. Directory-aware workloads require working identity and domain services after relocation.

B:

Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment would address a different requirement: A new AWS landing zone must enforce region restrictions before the first migration wave lands. Precutover governance prevents new workloads from deploying outside authorized boundaries.

C:

This alternative, Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials, is appropriate when An on-premises service account password is embedded in a migration script checked into Git. Secret rotation and controlled runtime retrieval prevent repeating source-code credential leaks.

Question 451

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A data transfer agent must write to one S3 destination prefix but has full account-wide administrator permissions. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope
  2. Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required
  3. Use incremental transfer retries and inspect the tool's detailed failure reports
  4. Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope. Narrow transfer-role policies protect other resources during bulk migrations.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A historical data archive requires documented chain of custody after copying into S3, Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required could be useful. Migration evidence must establish object completeness and protection from modification.

C:

Use incremental transfer retries and inspect the tool's detailed failure reports solves the related scenario A migration job fails on a few files with invalid path names and repeatedly restarts the entire transfer; targeted retries address malformed files without recopying an entire dataset.

D:

Although Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history can be valid when A regulated migration must prove that no unexpected records were exposed during source access, it targets a different technical condition. Fine-grained data access evidence supports migration security verification.

Question 452

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A historical data archive requires documented chain of custody after copying into S3. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key
  2. Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history
  3. Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required
  4. Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An encrypted S3 destination receives objects copied from another AWS account under a different KMS key, Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key could be useful. Cross-account object movement can fail without both source and destination key authority.

B:

Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history solves the related scenario A regulated migration must prove that no unexpected records were exposed during source access; fine-grained data access evidence supports migration security verification.

D:

Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope would address a different requirement: A data transfer agent must write to one S3 destination prefix but has full account-wide administrator permissions. Narrow transfer-role policies protect other resources during bulk migrations.

Question 453

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A migration job fails on a few files with invalid path names and repeatedly restarts the entire transfer. What should the architect implement?

  1. Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history
  2. Use incremental transfer retries and inspect the tool's detailed failure reports
  3. Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required
  4. Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use incremental transfer retries and inspect the tool's detailed failure reports. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history solves the related scenario A regulated migration must prove that no unexpected records were exposed during source access; fine-grained data access evidence supports migration security verification.

C:

Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required would address a different requirement: A historical data archive requires documented chain of custody after copying into S3. Migration evidence must establish object completeness and protection from modification.

D:

This alternative, Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key, is appropriate when An encrypted S3 destination receives objects copied from another AWS account under a different KMS key. Cross-account object movement can fail without both source and destination key authority.

Question 454

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: An encrypted S3 destination receives objects copied from another AWS account under a different KMS key. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope
  2. Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required
  3. Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key
  4. Use incremental transfer retries and inspect the tool's detailed failure reports

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key. Cross-account object movement can fail without both source and destination key authority.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope can be valid when A data transfer agent must write to one S3 destination prefix but has full account-wide administrator permissions, it targets a different technical condition. Narrow transfer-role policies protect other resources during bulk migrations.

B:

Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required would address a different requirement: A historical data archive requires documented chain of custody after copying into S3. Migration evidence must establish object completeness and protection from modification.

D:

For the separate situation A migration job fails on a few files with invalid path names and repeatedly restarts the entire transfer, Use incremental transfer retries and inspect the tool's detailed failure reports could be useful. Targeted retries address malformed files without recopying an entire dataset.

Question 455

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A regulated migration must prove that no unexpected records were exposed during source access. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required
  2. Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key
  3. Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope
  4. Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Scope audit logging and access controls to the migration role, and review data-access event history. Fine-grained data access evidence supports migration security verification.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Enable object integrity checks, audit logs and immutable retention where required would address a different requirement: A historical data archive requires documented chain of custody after copying into S3. Migration evidence must establish object completeness and protection from modification.

B:

This alternative, Configure correct KMS decrypt and encrypt permissions for the migration principal and destination key, is appropriate when An encrypted S3 destination receives objects copied from another AWS account under a different KMS key. Cross-account object movement can fail without both source and destination key authority.

C:

For the separate situation A data transfer agent must write to one S3 destination prefix but has full account-wide administrator permissions, Replace administrator permissions with minimum S3 and KMS actions at required resource scope could be useful. Narrow transfer-role policies protect other resources during bulk migrations.

Question 456

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A legacy application has a tightly coupled OS service and requires privileged host-level changes. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type
  2. Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed
  3. Use appropriate EC2 accelerated instances with workload-aware scheduling
  4. Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed. EC2 retains operating-system control unavailable in fully managed serverless services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A containerized API already has an ECS task definition and team wants to stop managing node instances, Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type could be useful. Fargate removes host provisioning while retaining ECS task and service concepts.

C:

Although Use appropriate EC2 accelerated instances with workload-aware scheduling can be valid when A large batch simulation runs for hours with custom GPU drivers and high fixed capacity needs, it targets a different technical condition. Long specialized compute jobs may require direct host and accelerator control.

D:

Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints would address a different requirement: A migrated HTTP handler is stateless, runs for seconds and has unpredictable demand. Lambda handles short on-demand work without persistent server capacity.

Question 457

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A migrated HTTP handler is stateless, runs for seconds and has unpredictable demand. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility
  2. Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints
  3. Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed
  4. Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility solves the related scenario A migration requires a managed web deployment environment for a supported platform with minimal infrastructure scripting; beanstalk handles environment orchestration while preserving a conventional web app deployment model.

C:

Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed would address a different requirement: A legacy application has a tightly coupled OS service and requires privileged host-level changes. EC2 retains operating-system control unavailable in fully managed serverless services.

D:

This alternative, Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type, is appropriate when A containerized API already has an ECS task definition and team wants to stop managing node instances. Fargate removes host provisioning while retaining ECS task and service concepts.

Question 458

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A containerized API already has an ECS task definition and team wants to stop managing node instances. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed
  2. Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type
  3. Use appropriate EC2 accelerated instances with workload-aware scheduling
  4. Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type. Fargate removes host provisioning while retaining ECS task and service concepts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed can be valid when A legacy application has a tightly coupled OS service and requires privileged host-level changes, it targets a different technical condition. EC2 retains operating-system control unavailable in fully managed serverless services.

C:

This alternative, Use appropriate EC2 accelerated instances with workload-aware scheduling, is appropriate when A large batch simulation runs for hours with custom GPU drivers and high fixed capacity needs. Long specialized compute jobs may require direct host and accelerator control.

D:

For the separate situation A migration requires a managed web deployment environment for a supported platform with minimal infrastructure scripting, Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility could be useful. Beanstalk handles environment orchestration while preserving a conventional web app deployment model.

Question 459

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A large batch simulation runs for hours with custom GPU drivers and high fixed capacity needs. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use appropriate EC2 accelerated instances with workload-aware scheduling
  2. Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type
  3. Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility
  4. Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use appropriate EC2 accelerated instances with workload-aware scheduling. Long specialized compute jobs may require direct host and accelerator control.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type, is appropriate when A containerized API already has an ECS task definition and team wants to stop managing node instances. Fargate removes host provisioning while retaining ECS task and service concepts.

C:

For the separate situation A migration requires a managed web deployment environment for a supported platform with minimal infrastructure scripting, Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility could be useful. Beanstalk handles environment orchestration while preserving a conventional web app deployment model.

D:

Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints solves the related scenario A migrated HTTP handler is stateless, runs for seconds and has unpredictable demand; lambda handles short on-demand work without persistent server capacity.

Question 460

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A migration requires a managed web deployment environment for a supported platform with minimal infrastructure scripting. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type
  2. Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed
  3. Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility
  4. Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Choose Elastic Beanstalk and test the application's platform compatibility. Beanstalk handles environment orchestration while preserving a conventional web app deployment model.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Migrate eligible tasks to ECS with Fargate launch type, is appropriate when A containerized API already has an ECS task definition and team wants to stop managing node instances. Fargate removes host provisioning while retaining ECS task and service concepts.

B:

For the separate situation A legacy application has a tightly coupled OS service and requires privileged host-level changes, Keep it on managed EC2 instances until those OS dependencies can be removed could be useful. EC2 retains operating-system control unavailable in fully managed serverless services.

D:

Although Move the handler to Lambda after validating runtime and request constraints can be valid when A migrated HTTP handler is stateless, runs for seconds and has unpredictable demand, it targets a different technical condition. Lambda handles short on-demand work without persistent server capacity.