mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 45

Question 440

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: An existing Windows SMB share must be presented locally while files are progressively moved to S3. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Reserve AWS Data Transfer Terminal and bring the storage devices for high-speed ingestion
  2. Configure AWS Transfer Family with SFTP and approved authentication
  3. Use AWS Storage Gateway File Gateway with appropriate on-premises deployment
  4. Use AWS DataSync with suitable source and target locations and scheduled verification

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use AWS Storage Gateway File Gateway with appropriate on-premises deployment. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An AWS Enterprise Support customer can physically transport portable drives to an AWS transfer facility but cannot upload 500 TB over its office WAN, Reserve AWS Data Transfer Terminal and bring the storage devices for high-speed ingestion could be useful. Data Transfer Terminal accepts customer-owned devices at secured physical facilities; Snow Family devices are unavailable to new customers.

B:

Configure AWS Transfer Family with SFTP and approved authentication solves the related scenario A partner requires managed SFTP uploads into an AWS-hosted S3 bucket; transfer Family presents managed file-transfer protocols backed by AWS storage.

D:

Use AWS DataSync with suitable source and target locations and scheduled verification would address a different requirement: A NAS holds 80 TB of files that must move to EFS over a reliable WAN without custom sync scripts. DataSync transfers supported file data with managed copy and integrity features.

Question 441

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: After application cutover, some clients still resolve an old on-premises hostname because DNS TTLs are high. What should the architect implement?

  1. Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target
  2. Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation
  3. Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate
  4. Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation. Clients may retain previous DNS answers until caching periods expire.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target can be valid when A database is cut over while on-premises writes continue to the old primary, it targets a different technical condition. Split-brain writes create diverging database state during migration.

C:

This alternative, Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate, is appropriate when A migration fails only for internal users because on-premises DNS queries do not resolve private AWS names. Hybrid DNS forwarding provides private VPC-name resolution to external enterprise resolvers.

D:

For the separate situation A source service must operate simultaneously with the new AWS environment during a short validation window, Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans could be useful. Weighted routing allows controlled traffic split while both application backends remain operational.

Question 442

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A migration plan assumes the production domain can be changed even though the external registrar zone remains authoritative elsewhere. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target
  2. Validate domain delegation and authoritative DNS ownership before Route 53 updates
  3. Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation
  4. Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Validate domain delegation and authoritative DNS ownership before Route 53 updates. Changes in a nonauthoritative zone do not affect public DNS responses.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target would address a different requirement: A database is cut over while on-premises writes continue to the old primary. Split-brain writes create diverging database state during migration.

C:

For the separate situation After application cutover, some clients still resolve an old on-premises hostname because DNS TTLs are high, Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation could be useful. Clients may retain previous DNS answers until caching periods expire.

D:

Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans solves the related scenario A source service must operate simultaneously with the new AWS environment during a short validation window; weighted routing allows controlled traffic split while both application backends remain operational.

Question 443

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A source service must operate simultaneously with the new AWS environment during a short validation window. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans
  2. Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation
  3. Validate domain delegation and authoritative DNS ownership before Route 53 updates
  4. Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans. Weighted routing allows controlled traffic split while both application backends remain operational.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation After application cutover, some clients still resolve an old on-premises hostname because DNS TTLs are high, Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation could be useful. Clients may retain previous DNS answers until caching periods expire.

C:

Validate domain delegation and authoritative DNS ownership before Route 53 updates solves the related scenario A migration plan assumes the production domain can be changed even though the external registrar zone remains authoritative elsewhere; changes in a nonauthoritative zone do not affect public DNS responses.

D:

Although Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate can be valid when A migration fails only for internal users because on-premises DNS queries do not resolve private AWS names, it targets a different technical condition. Hybrid DNS forwarding provides private VPC-name resolution to external enterprise resolvers.

Question 444

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A database is cut over while on-premises writes continue to the old primary. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans
  2. Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate
  3. Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target
  4. Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A source service must operate simultaneously with the new AWS environment during a short validation window, Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans could be useful. Weighted routing allows controlled traffic split while both application backends remain operational.

B:

Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate solves the related scenario A migration fails only for internal users because on-premises DNS queries do not resolve private AWS names; hybrid DNS forwarding provides private VPC-name resolution to external enterprise resolvers.

D:

Lower appropriate DNS TTLs ahead of cutover and monitor resolver propagation would address a different requirement: After application cutover, some clients still resolve an old on-premises hostname because DNS TTLs are high. Clients may retain previous DNS answers until caching periods expire.

Question 445

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A migration fails only for internal users because on-premises DNS queries do not resolve private AWS names. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target
  2. Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate
  3. Validate domain delegation and authoritative DNS ownership before Route 53 updates
  4. Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Deploy Resolver inbound endpoints and forwarding from corporate DNS where appropriate. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Freeze or redirect writes to an agreed single writer before promoting the AWS target solves the related scenario A database is cut over while on-premises writes continue to the old primary; split-brain writes create diverging database state during migration.

C:

Validate domain delegation and authoritative DNS ownership before Route 53 updates would address a different requirement: A migration plan assumes the production domain can be changed even though the external registrar zone remains authoritative elsewhere. Changes in a nonauthoritative zone do not affect public DNS responses.

D:

This alternative, Configure bounded weighted DNS traffic shifting with compatible data and rollback plans, is appropriate when A source service must operate simultaneously with the new AWS environment during a short validation window. Weighted routing allows controlled traffic split while both application backends remain operational.

Question 446

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A migrated application previously used Active Directory integrated authentication for file shares. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure
  2. Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration
  3. Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity
  4. Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration. Directory-aware workloads require working identity and domain services after relocation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure would address a different requirement: A migration requires workloads to access a corporate IdP when a Direct Connect circuit fails. Authentication availability is part of the recovery path for migrated services.

C:

For the separate situation A migrated Windows service must retain Kerberos access to users in the existing on-premises AD forest while using AWS Managed Microsoft AD, Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity could be useful. Directory trust enables cross-forest authentication when DNS and Kerberos paths work between the forests.

D:

Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials solves the related scenario An on-premises service account password is embedded in a migration script checked into Git; secret rotation and controlled runtime retrieval prevent repeating source-code credential leaks.

Question 447

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A migrated Windows service must retain Kerberos access to users in the existing on-premises AD forest while using AWS Managed Microsoft AD. What should the architect implement?

  1. Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity
  2. Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment
  3. Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials
  4. Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity. Directory trust enables cross-forest authentication when DNS and Kerberos paths work between the forests.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A new AWS landing zone must enforce region restrictions before the first migration wave lands, Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment could be useful. Precutover governance prevents new workloads from deploying outside authorized boundaries.

C:

Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials solves the related scenario An on-premises service account password is embedded in a migration script checked into Git; secret rotation and controlled runtime retrieval prevent repeating source-code credential leaks.

D:

Although Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure can be valid when A migration requires workloads to access a corporate IdP when a Direct Connect circuit fails, it targets a different technical condition. Authentication availability is part of the recovery path for migrated services.

Question 448

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A new AWS landing zone must enforce region restrictions before the first migration wave lands. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity
  2. Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials
  3. Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration
  4. Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment. Precutover governance prevents new workloads from deploying outside authorized boundaries.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A migrated Windows service must retain Kerberos access to users in the existing on-premises AD forest while using AWS Managed Microsoft AD, Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity could be useful. Directory trust enables cross-forest authentication when DNS and Kerberos paths work between the forests.

B:

Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials solves the related scenario An on-premises service account password is embedded in a migration script checked into Git; secret rotation and controlled runtime retrieval prevent repeating source-code credential leaks.

C:

Although Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration can be valid when A migrated application previously used Active Directory integrated authentication for file shares, it targets a different technical condition. Directory-aware workloads require working identity and domain services after relocation.

Question 449

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: An on-premises service account password is embedded in a migration script checked into Git. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure
  2. Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration
  3. Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials
  4. Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials. Secret rotation and controlled runtime retrieval prevent repeating source-code credential leaks.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure solves the related scenario A migration requires workloads to access a corporate IdP when a Direct Connect circuit fails; authentication availability is part of the recovery path for migrated services.

B:

Although Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration can be valid when A migrated application previously used Active Directory integrated authentication for file shares, it targets a different technical condition. Directory-aware workloads require working identity and domain services after relocation.

D:

This alternative, Configure a supported Active Directory trust and hybrid DNS and network connectivity, is appropriate when A migrated Windows service must retain Kerberos access to users in the existing on-premises AD forest while using AWS Managed Microsoft AD. Directory trust enables cross-forest authentication when DNS and Kerberos paths work between the forests.

Question 450

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A migration requires workloads to access a corporate IdP when a Direct Connect circuit fails. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration
  2. Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment
  3. Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials
  4. Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure backup hybrid identity connectivity and test the path under circuit failure. Authentication availability is part of the recovery path for migrated services.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Provide compatible directory connectivity through AWS Directory Service or managed AD integration can be valid when A migrated application previously used Active Directory integrated authentication for file shares, it targets a different technical condition. Directory-aware workloads require working identity and domain services after relocation.

B:

Establish appropriate Organizations OUs and SCP guardrails before account enrollment would address a different requirement: A new AWS landing zone must enforce region restrictions before the first migration wave lands. Precutover governance prevents new workloads from deploying outside authorized boundaries.

C:

This alternative, Remove and rotate the secret and use Secrets Manager or temporary role credentials, is appropriate when An on-premises service account password is embedded in a migration script checked into Git. Secret rotation and controlled runtime retrieval prevent repeating source-code credential leaks.