Question 260
While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A baseline compute commitment is near expiration after a migration to Graviton. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Reevaluate coverage and eligible architecture before renewing commitments. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.
Incorrect Answers
This alternative, Use Spot capacity with resilient interruption processing and mixed-instance policies, is appropriate when A batch rendering fleet can checkpoint work every few minutes and has flexible deadlines. Interruptible discounts fit recoverable work that can resume on replacement nodes.
For the separate situation An underused application instance is twice as large as its measured peak requirements, Reduce instance size after load testing and monitor new headroom could be useful. Rightsizing removes paid idle CPU and memory before buying discounts.
Commit only the stable baseline to Savings Plans and keep bursts on elastic on-demand capacity solves the related scenario A new service has stable compute usage at night but highly volatile daytime traffic; splitting baseline and burst avoids overcommitting to uncertain peak usage.