mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 25

Question 240

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A new industrial monitoring system needs real-time measurements queried by timestamp through native InfluxDB APIs. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Choose DynamoDB with well-distributed partition keys and suitable capacity mode
  2. Use Amazon Aurora or RDS relational databases with an appropriate engine
  3. Use Amazon Timestream for InfluxDB with appropriate tag and retention design
  4. Evaluate Amazon Neptune for graph traversal workload requirements

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use Amazon Timestream for InfluxDB with appropriate tag and retention design. Managed InfluxDB supports time-series ingestion and query patterns for new customers, unlike closed-to-new-customer LiveAnalytics.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A high-throughput key-value service needs predictable single-digit-millisecond access at large scale, Choose DynamoDB with well-distributed partition keys and suitable capacity mode could be useful. DynamoDB is designed for scalable key-value access patterns without relational joins.

B:

Use Amazon Aurora or RDS relational databases with an appropriate engine solves the related scenario An application requires complex SQL joins and ACID transactions over structured entities; relational databases natively support SQL joins and transaction semantics.

D:

Evaluate Amazon Neptune for graph traversal workload requirements would address a different requirement: A social graph must repeatedly traverse variable-depth connections between entities. A graph model supports relationship traversals beyond simple key lookups.

Question 241

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: A batch job performs high-volume numerical operations that benefit from SIMD instructions. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput
  2. Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances
  3. Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles
  4. Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances would address a different requirement: A high-frequency trading app needs low-latency east-west network inside one AZ. Cluster placement groups place compatible instances close for low-latency throughput.

C:

This alternative, Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles, is appropriate when A large in-memory analytics service is page-faulting because its working set exceeds RAM. Memory-focused capacity reduces swapping and memory-pressure bottlenecks.

D:

For the separate situation A throughput-sensitive EC2 fleet underutilizes network bandwidth due to its instance type, Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints could be useful. Network performance depends on instance capabilities as well as topology.

Question 242

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A machine learning inference job needs GPU-accelerated deep-learning execution. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances
  2. Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles
  3. Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput
  4. Choose supported accelerated-computing instances sized for model memory and throughput

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Choose supported accelerated-computing instances sized for model memory and throughput. GPU instances accelerate parallel model operations unavailable on general-purpose CPUs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances would address a different requirement: A high-frequency trading app needs low-latency east-west network inside one AZ. Cluster placement groups place compatible instances close for low-latency throughput.

B:

This alternative, Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles, is appropriate when A large in-memory analytics service is page-faulting because its working set exceeds RAM. Memory-focused capacity reduces swapping and memory-pressure bottlenecks.

C:

For the separate situation A batch job performs high-volume numerical operations that benefit from SIMD instructions, Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput could be useful. Compute-optimized instances prioritize processor resources for CPU-bound applications.

Question 243

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A high-frequency trading app needs low-latency east-west network inside one AZ. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances
  2. Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints
  3. Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput
  4. Choose supported accelerated-computing instances sized for model memory and throughput

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances. Cluster placement groups place compatible instances close for low-latency throughput.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A throughput-sensitive EC2 fleet underutilizes network bandwidth due to its instance type, Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints could be useful. Network performance depends on instance capabilities as well as topology.

C:

Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput solves the related scenario A batch job performs high-volume numerical operations that benefit from SIMD instructions; compute-optimized instances prioritize processor resources for CPU-bound applications.

D:

Although Choose supported accelerated-computing instances sized for model memory and throughput can be valid when A machine learning inference job needs GPU-accelerated deep-learning execution, it targets a different technical condition. GPU instances accelerate parallel model operations unavailable on general-purpose CPUs.

Question 244

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A large in-memory analytics service is page-faulting because its working set exceeds RAM. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput
  2. Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles
  3. Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances
  4. Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles. Memory-focused capacity reduces swapping and memory-pressure bottlenecks.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A batch job performs high-volume numerical operations that benefit from SIMD instructions, Benchmark compute-optimized EC2 families against the job's actual throughput could be useful. Compute-optimized instances prioritize processor resources for CPU-bound applications.

C:

Although Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances can be valid when A high-frequency trading app needs low-latency east-west network inside one AZ, it targets a different technical condition. Cluster placement groups place compatible instances close for low-latency throughput.

D:

Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints would address a different requirement: A throughput-sensitive EC2 fleet underutilizes network bandwidth due to its instance type. Network performance depends on instance capabilities as well as topology.

Question 245

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A throughput-sensitive EC2 fleet underutilizes network bandwidth due to its instance type. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints
  2. Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances
  3. Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles
  4. Choose supported accelerated-computing instances sized for model memory and throughput

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Compare supported enhanced networking, instance bandwidth and placement constraints. Network performance depends on instance capabilities as well as topology.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Use a cluster placement group with supported enhanced-networking instances can be valid when A high-frequency trading app needs low-latency east-west network inside one AZ, it targets a different technical condition. Cluster placement groups place compatible instances close for low-latency throughput.

C:

Select memory-optimized instances after measuring heap and allocation profiles would address a different requirement: A large in-memory analytics service is page-faulting because its working set exceeds RAM. Memory-focused capacity reduces swapping and memory-pressure bottlenecks.

D:

This alternative, Choose supported accelerated-computing instances sized for model memory and throughput, is appropriate when A machine learning inference job needs GPU-accelerated deep-learning execution. GPU instances accelerate parallel model operations unavailable on general-purpose CPUs.

Question 246

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A relational database on EC2 needs consistently provisioned high random IOPS on attached block storage. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration
  2. Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns
  3. Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs
  4. Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs. Provisioned IOPS EBS supplies independently configured block IOPS and throughput.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration would address a different requirement: A distributed HPC application needs very high throughput parallel file access and optional S3 data repository integration. Lustre is designed for parallel high-performance file workloads.

B:

This alternative, Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns, is appropriate when An object archive stores images and videos accessed through REST APIs rather than mounted file-system semantics. Object storage scales independently of server volume and file share mounts.

D:

Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls solves the related scenario Hundreds of Linux application hosts require concurrent access to a managed shared POSIX file system; eFS provides elastic shared NFS storage for Linux workloads.

Question 247

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: Hundreds of Linux application hosts require concurrent access to a managed shared POSIX file system. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns
  2. Increase FSx for Windows throughput capacity after measuring client I/O and workload limits
  3. Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls
  4. Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls. EFS provides elastic shared NFS storage for Linux workloads.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns, is appropriate when An object archive stores images and videos accessed through REST APIs rather than mounted file-system semantics. Object storage scales independently of server volume and file share mounts.

B:

For the separate situation An existing FSx for Windows File Server share has adequate storage but SMB clients saturate file throughput during daily processing, Increase FSx for Windows throughput capacity after measuring client I/O and workload limits could be useful. File-system throughput capacity is provisioned separately from total stored file capacity.

D:

Although Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration can be valid when A distributed HPC application needs very high throughput parallel file access and optional S3 data repository integration, it targets a different technical condition. Lustre is designed for parallel high-performance file workloads.

Question 248

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: An existing FSx for Windows File Server share has adequate storage but SMB clients saturate file throughput during daily processing. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs
  2. Increase FSx for Windows throughput capacity after measuring client I/O and workload limits
  3. Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls
  4. Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Increase FSx for Windows throughput capacity after measuring client I/O and workload limits. File-system throughput capacity is provisioned separately from total stored file capacity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A relational database on EC2 needs consistently provisioned high random IOPS on attached block storage, Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs could be useful. Provisioned IOPS EBS supplies independently configured block IOPS and throughput.

C:

Although Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls can be valid when Hundreds of Linux application hosts require concurrent access to a managed shared POSIX file system, it targets a different technical condition. EFS provides elastic shared NFS storage for Linux workloads.

D:

Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration would address a different requirement: A distributed HPC application needs very high throughput parallel file access and optional S3 data repository integration. Lustre is designed for parallel high-performance file workloads.

Question 249

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A distributed HPC application needs very high throughput parallel file access and optional S3 data repository integration. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls
  2. Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns
  3. Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration
  4. Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration. Lustre is designed for parallel high-performance file workloads.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Amazon EFS with appropriate performance and access controls solves the related scenario Hundreds of Linux application hosts require concurrent access to a managed shared POSIX file system; eFS provides elastic shared NFS storage for Linux workloads.

B:

Although Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns can be valid when An object archive stores images and videos accessed through REST APIs rather than mounted file-system semantics, it targets a different technical condition. Object storage scales independently of server volume and file share mounts.

D:

This alternative, Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs, is appropriate when A relational database on EC2 needs consistently provisioned high random IOPS on attached block storage. Provisioned IOPS EBS supplies independently configured block IOPS and throughput.

Question 250

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: An object archive stores images and videos accessed through REST APIs rather than mounted file-system semantics. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration
  2. Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs
  3. Increase FSx for Windows throughput capacity after measuring client I/O and workload limits
  4. Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Store the content in S3 with suitable key naming and retrieval patterns. Object storage scales independently of server volume and file share mounts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Choose Amazon FSx for Lustre with an appropriate deployment and S3 integration can be valid when A distributed HPC application needs very high throughput parallel file access and optional S3 data repository integration, it targets a different technical condition. Lustre is designed for parallel high-performance file workloads.

B:

Select EBS Provisioned IOPS SSD with performance sizing validated against workload needs would address a different requirement: A relational database on EC2 needs consistently provisioned high random IOPS on attached block storage. Provisioned IOPS EBS supplies independently configured block IOPS and throughput.

C:

This alternative, Increase FSx for Windows throughput capacity after measuring client I/O and workload limits, is appropriate when An existing FSx for Windows File Server share has adequate storage but SMB clients saturate file throughput during daily processing. File-system throughput capacity is provisioned separately from total stored file capacity.