mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 20

Question 190

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A team must detect wildcard permissions newly granted to production roles. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads
  2. Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions
  3. Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources
  4. Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An organization requires MFA for human console access while backend EC2 services run unattended, Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads could be useful. Human sign-in controls and machine roles are separate identity responsibilities.

B:

Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions solves the related scenario A Lambda function needs to read only one named DynamoDB table and no other table; resource-scoped role permissions limit data access to the intended table.

D:

Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal would address a different requirement: A service in one account needs to invoke a private Lambda function in a second account. Cross-account Lambda invocation requires the function policy to authorize the caller.

Question 191

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: An S3-based data lake must encrypt new objects under a centrally controlled customer-managed key. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies
  2. Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable
  3. Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener
  4. Grant the job role only the needed KMS decrypt permissions and applicable key-policy authorization

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies. SSE-KMS combines S3 data encryption with auditable customer-managed key authorization.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable would address a different requirement: A confidential S3 archive must prevent inadvertent plaintext uploads by older clients. Bucket policy conditions reject uploads that do not meet stated encryption requirements.

C:

This alternative, Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener, is appropriate when A payment API must terminate public TLS with managed certificate lifecycle. ALB TLS listeners integrate certificate management with traffic termination.

D:

For the separate situation A data-processing job needs to decrypt its source KMS data key but must not administer the key, Grant the job role only the needed KMS decrypt permissions and applicable key-policy authorization could be useful. Key-use privileges can be separated from KMS administrative rights.

Question 192

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A payment API must terminate public TLS with managed certificate lifecycle. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies
  2. Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust
  3. Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable
  4. Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener. ALB TLS listeners integrate certificate management with traffic termination.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies would address a different requirement: An S3-based data lake must encrypt new objects under a centrally controlled customer-managed key. SSE-KMS combines S3 data encryption with auditable customer-managed key authorization.

B:

This alternative, Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust, is appropriate when A new multi-Region application must use HTTPS between internal microservices, not just at the public ALB. Public-edge TLS termination alone does not encrypt internal application hops.

C:

For the separate situation A confidential S3 archive must prevent inadvertent plaintext uploads by older clients, Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable could be useful. Bucket policy conditions reject uploads that do not meet stated encryption requirements.

Question 193

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A data-processing job needs to decrypt its source KMS data key but must not administer the key. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust
  2. Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable
  3. Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener
  4. Grant the job role only the needed KMS decrypt permissions and applicable key-policy authorization

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Grant the job role only the needed KMS decrypt permissions and applicable key-policy authorization. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust, is appropriate when A new multi-Region application must use HTTPS between internal microservices, not just at the public ALB. Public-edge TLS termination alone does not encrypt internal application hops.

B:

For the separate situation A confidential S3 archive must prevent inadvertent plaintext uploads by older clients, Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable could be useful. Bucket policy conditions reject uploads that do not meet stated encryption requirements.

C:

Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener solves the related scenario A payment API must terminate public TLS with managed certificate lifecycle; aLB TLS listeners integrate certificate management with traffic termination.

Question 194

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A new multi-Region application must use HTTPS between internal microservices, not just at the public ALB. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Grant the job role only the needed KMS decrypt permissions and applicable key-policy authorization
  2. Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies
  3. Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust
  4. Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust. Public-edge TLS termination alone does not encrypt internal application hops.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A data-processing job needs to decrypt its source KMS data key but must not administer the key, Grant the job role only the needed KMS decrypt permissions and applicable key-policy authorization could be useful. Key-use privileges can be separated from KMS administrative rights.

B:

Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies solves the related scenario An S3-based data lake must encrypt new objects under a centrally controlled customer-managed key; sSE-KMS combines S3 data encryption with auditable customer-managed key authorization.

D:

Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener would address a different requirement: A payment API must terminate public TLS with managed certificate lifecycle. ALB TLS listeners integrate certificate management with traffic termination.

Question 195

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A confidential S3 archive must prevent inadvertent plaintext uploads by older clients. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies
  2. Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener
  3. Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable
  4. Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enforce permitted encryption headers and key conditions with S3 bucket policies where applicable. Bucket policy conditions reject uploads that do not meet stated encryption requirements.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Set SSE-KMS default encryption and tightly scope key and bucket policies solves the related scenario An S3-based data lake must encrypt new objects under a centrally controlled customer-managed key; sSE-KMS combines S3 data encryption with auditable customer-managed key authorization.

B:

Although Attach a valid ACM public certificate to the public Application Load Balancer HTTPS listener can be valid when A payment API must terminate public TLS with managed certificate lifecycle, it targets a different technical condition. ALB TLS listeners integrate certificate management with traffic termination.

D:

This alternative, Require TLS on internal service connections with suitable certificate issuance and trust, is appropriate when A new multi-Region application must use HTTPS between internal microservices, not just at the public ALB. Public-edge TLS termination alone does not encrypt internal application hops.

Question 196

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A public API experiences HTTP request flooding and needs customizable managed request-rate blocking. What should the architect implement?

  1. Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources
  2. Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure
  3. Enable suitable AWS WAF managed rule groups with staged false-positive evaluation
  4. Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution. AWS WAF filters HTTP-layer requests using configurable web ACL rules.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources would address a different requirement: A public service must withstand large volumetric DDoS events and needs specialized incident support. Shield Advanced adds advanced DDoS capabilities and response support beyond standard protections.

B:

This alternative, Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure, is appropriate when A container workload shows suspicious outbound calls to a known command-and-control address. GuardDuty detects suspicious account and network behavior for investigation.

C:

For the separate situation A public web server needs managed prevention for known malicious SQL-injection patterns, Enable suitable AWS WAF managed rule groups with staged false-positive evaluation could be useful. Managed WAF rules inspect web requests for common attack signatures.

Question 197

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A public service must withstand large volumetric DDoS events and needs specialized incident support. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure
  2. Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups
  3. Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution
  4. Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources. Shield Advanced adds advanced DDoS capabilities and response support beyond standard protections.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure, is appropriate when A container workload shows suspicious outbound calls to a known command-and-control address. GuardDuty detects suspicious account and network behavior for investigation.

B:

For the separate situation A production VPC needs inline stateful filtering of suspicious east-west and egress traffic, Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups could be useful. Stateful network inspection applies packet and protocol policy beyond HTTP-only WAF.

C:

Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution solves the related scenario A public API experiences HTTP request flooding and needs customizable managed request-rate blocking; aWS WAF filters HTTP-layer requests using configurable web ACL rules.

Question 198

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A container workload shows suspicious outbound calls to a known command-and-control address. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups
  2. Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution
  3. Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure
  4. Enable suitable AWS WAF managed rule groups with staged false-positive evaluation

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A production VPC needs inline stateful filtering of suspicious east-west and egress traffic, Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups could be useful. Stateful network inspection applies packet and protocol policy beyond HTTP-only WAF.

B:

Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution solves the related scenario A public API experiences HTTP request flooding and needs customizable managed request-rate blocking; aWS WAF filters HTTP-layer requests using configurable web ACL rules.

D:

Enable suitable AWS WAF managed rule groups with staged false-positive evaluation would address a different requirement: A public web server needs managed prevention for known malicious SQL-injection patterns. Managed WAF rules inspect web requests for common attack signatures.

Question 199

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A public web server needs managed prevention for known malicious SQL-injection patterns. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Enable suitable AWS WAF managed rule groups with staged false-positive evaluation
  2. Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources
  3. Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure
  4. Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Enable suitable AWS WAF managed rule groups with staged false-positive evaluation. Managed WAF rules inspect web requests for common attack signatures.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources can be valid when A public service must withstand large volumetric DDoS events and needs specialized incident support, it targets a different technical condition. Shield Advanced adds advanced DDoS capabilities and response support beyond standard protections.

C:

Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure would address a different requirement: A container workload shows suspicious outbound calls to a known command-and-control address. GuardDuty detects suspicious account and network behavior for investigation.

D:

This alternative, Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups, is appropriate when A production VPC needs inline stateful filtering of suspicious east-west and egress traffic. Stateful network inspection applies packet and protocol policy beyond HTTP-only WAF.

Question 200

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A production VPC needs inline stateful filtering of suspicious east-west and egress traffic. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups
  2. Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources
  3. Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure
  4. Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Route relevant paths through AWS Network Firewall endpoints and rule groups. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Evaluate AWS Shield Advanced and appropriate protected resources would address a different requirement: A public service must withstand large volumetric DDoS events and needs specialized incident support. Shield Advanced adds advanced DDoS capabilities and response support beyond standard protections.

C:

This alternative, Use GuardDuty threat findings and an approved isolation response procedure, is appropriate when A container workload shows suspicious outbound calls to a known command-and-control address. GuardDuty detects suspicious account and network behavior for investigation.

D:

For the separate situation A public API experiences HTTP request flooding and needs customizable managed request-rate blocking, Attach AWS WAF rate-based rules to the protected API or CloudFront distribution could be useful. AWS WAF filters HTTP-layer requests using configurable web ACL rules.