mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 19

Question 180

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A failed CloudFormation deployment must notify operations and trigger controlled recovery steps. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Configure ECS service health-based replacement and load balancer health checks
  2. Match CloudFormation stack state-change events with EventBridge and invoke a runbook
  3. Orchestrate the failover with Step Functions approval steps and audited transitions
  4. Define CloudWatch alarms on application errors and saturation signals with escalations

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Match CloudFormation stack state-change events with EventBridge and invoke a runbook. Event-driven remediation responds to deployment failure states without continuous polling.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure ECS service health-based replacement and load balancer health checks would address a different requirement: An ECS service's health check repeatedly fails and operators currently restart tasks manually. ECS services replace unhealthy tasks to restore desired capacity.

C:

For the separate situation A regional failover requires two operators to approve any data-writer promotion, Orchestrate the failover with Step Functions approval steps and audited transitions could be useful. Human approval gates prevent automated promotion from violating recovery governance.

D:

Define CloudWatch alarms on application errors and saturation signals with escalations solves the related scenario A cloud application must alert on elevated end-user error rate before its database exhausts connections; leading health and capacity signals trigger response before failure is total.

Question 181

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: An internet-facing ALB must reach a private app tier while the app tier must accept only ALB traffic. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups
  2. Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls
  3. Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source
  4. Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A private RDS database must never have an internet-routable endpoint, Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups could be useful. Private subnet placement and endpoint settings eliminate direct public database reachability.

B:

Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls solves the related scenario A development team permits outbound HTTPS broadly but must restrict server access to approved business CIDRs; security groups are stateful instance-level allow rules, not blanket organization-wide access grants.

D:

Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway would address a different requirement: A public service uses IPv6 and needs outbound-only initiated connections without unsolicited inbound IPv6 routes. Egress-only gateways permit initiated IPv6 access without open inbound internet routing.

Question 182

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A bank needs stateless subnet-wide deny rules for a known prohibited IP range. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups
  2. Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls
  3. Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source
  4. Add explicit deny entries in subnet network ACLs in correct numerical order

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Add explicit deny entries in subnet network ACLs in correct numerical order. NACLs support stateless allow and deny processing with ordered rules.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups solves the related scenario A private RDS database must never have an internet-routable endpoint; private subnet placement and endpoint settings eliminate direct public database reachability.

B:

Although Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls can be valid when A development team permits outbound HTTPS broadly but must restrict server access to approved business CIDRs, it targets a different technical condition. Security groups are stateful instance-level allow rules, not blanket organization-wide access grants.

C:

Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source would address a different requirement: An internet-facing ALB must reach a private app tier while the app tier must accept only ALB traffic. Security-group references bind access to the intended upstream tier.

Question 183

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A private RDS database must never have an internet-routable endpoint. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway
  2. Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source
  3. Add explicit deny entries in subnet network ACLs in correct numerical order
  4. Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups. Private subnet placement and endpoint settings eliminate direct public database reachability.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway can be valid when A public service uses IPv6 and needs outbound-only initiated connections without unsolicited inbound IPv6 routes, it targets a different technical condition. Egress-only gateways permit initiated IPv6 access without open inbound internet routing.

B:

Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source would address a different requirement: An internet-facing ALB must reach a private app tier while the app tier must accept only ALB traffic. Security-group references bind access to the intended upstream tier.

C:

This alternative, Add explicit deny entries in subnet network ACLs in correct numerical order, is appropriate when A bank needs stateless subnet-wide deny rules for a known prohibited IP range. NACLs support stateless allow and deny processing with ordered rules.

Question 184

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A development team permits outbound HTTPS broadly but must restrict server access to approved business CIDRs. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls
  2. Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source
  3. Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups
  4. Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls. Security groups are stateful instance-level allow rules, not blanket organization-wide access grants.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Configure the application security group ingress with the ALB security group as source, is appropriate when An internet-facing ALB must reach a private app tier while the app tier must accept only ALB traffic. Security-group references bind access to the intended upstream tier.

C:

For the separate situation A private RDS database must never have an internet-routable endpoint, Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups could be useful. Private subnet placement and endpoint settings eliminate direct public database reachability.

D:

Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway solves the related scenario A public service uses IPv6 and needs outbound-only initiated connections without unsolicited inbound IPv6 routes; egress-only gateways permit initiated IPv6 access without open inbound internet routing.

Question 185

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: A public service uses IPv6 and needs outbound-only initiated connections without unsolicited inbound IPv6 routes. What should the architect implement?

  1. Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway
  2. Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups
  3. Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls
  4. Add explicit deny entries in subnet network ACLs in correct numerical order

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Route IPv6 egress through an egress-only internet gateway. Egress-only gateways permit initiated IPv6 access without open inbound internet routing.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A private RDS database must never have an internet-routable endpoint, Deploy RDS in private subnets with public accessibility disabled and scoped security groups could be useful. Private subnet placement and endpoint settings eliminate direct public database reachability.

C:

Apply narrowly scoped inbound security-group rules and complementary network controls solves the related scenario A development team permits outbound HTTPS broadly but must restrict server access to approved business CIDRs; security groups are stateful instance-level allow rules, not blanket organization-wide access grants.

D:

Although Add explicit deny entries in subnet network ACLs in correct numerical order can be valid when A bank needs stateless subnet-wide deny rules for a known prohibited IP range, it targets a different technical condition. NACLs support stateless allow and deny processing with ordered rules.

Question 186

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A Lambda function needs to read only one named DynamoDB table and no other table. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads
  2. Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources
  3. Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions
  4. Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions. Resource-scoped role permissions limit data access to the intended table.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads solves the related scenario An organization requires MFA for human console access while backend EC2 services run unattended; human sign-in controls and machine roles are separate identity responsibilities.

B:

Although Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources can be valid when A team must detect wildcard permissions newly granted to production roles, it targets a different technical condition. Policy analysis helps identify overly broad rights before deployment.

C:

Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions would address a different requirement: A browser app must upload objects without receiving long-lived AWS access keys. Presigned requests delegate bounded object operations without exposing backend credentials.

Question 187

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A browser app must upload objects without receiving long-lived AWS access keys. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources
  2. Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal
  3. Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads
  4. Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions. Presigned requests delegate bounded object operations without exposing backend credentials.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources can be valid when A team must detect wildcard permissions newly granted to production roles, it targets a different technical condition. Policy analysis helps identify overly broad rights before deployment.

B:

Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal would address a different requirement: A service in one account needs to invoke a private Lambda function in a second account. Cross-account Lambda invocation requires the function policy to authorize the caller.

C:

This alternative, Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads, is appropriate when An organization requires MFA for human console access while backend EC2 services run unattended. Human sign-in controls and machine roles are separate identity responsibilities.

Question 188

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A service in one account needs to invoke a private Lambda function in a second account. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions
  2. Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions
  3. Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads
  4. Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal. Cross-account Lambda invocation requires the function policy to authorize the caller.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions would address a different requirement: A Lambda function needs to read only one named DynamoDB table and no other table. Resource-scoped role permissions limit data access to the intended table.

B:

This alternative, Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions, is appropriate when A browser app must upload objects without receiving long-lived AWS access keys. Presigned requests delegate bounded object operations without exposing backend credentials.

C:

For the separate situation An organization requires MFA for human console access while backend EC2 services run unattended, Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads could be useful. Human sign-in controls and machine roles are separate identity responsibilities.

Question 189

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: An organization requires MFA for human console access while backend EC2 services run unattended. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions
  2. Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads
  3. Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources
  4. Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads. Human sign-in controls and machine roles are separate identity responsibilities.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Have a trusted backend issue short-lived S3 presigned upload URLs with restricted conditions, is appropriate when A browser app must upload objects without receiving long-lived AWS access keys. Presigned requests delegate bounded object operations without exposing backend credentials.

C:

Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources solves the related scenario A team must detect wildcard permissions newly granted to production roles; policy analysis helps identify overly broad rights before deployment.

D:

Although Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions can be valid when A Lambda function needs to read only one named DynamoDB table and no other table, it targets a different technical condition. Resource-scoped role permissions limit data access to the intended table.

Question 190

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A team must detect wildcard permissions newly granted to production roles. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads
  2. Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions
  3. Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources
  4. Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use IAM Access Analyzer policy checks and least-privilege review to narrow actions and resources. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An organization requires MFA for human console access while backend EC2 services run unattended, Enforce strong workforce MFA through federated identity and use roles for service workloads could be useful. Human sign-in controls and machine roles are separate identity responsibilities.

B:

Attach an execution role policy scoped to the table ARN and required actions solves the related scenario A Lambda function needs to read only one named DynamoDB table and no other table; resource-scoped role permissions limit data access to the intended table.

D:

Configure execution identity and the Lambda resource-based invoke permission for the trusted principal would address a different requirement: A service in one account needs to invoke a private Lambda function in a second account. Cross-account Lambda invocation requires the function policy to authorize the caller.