mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Questions & Answers

    1041 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Training Course

    368 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Study Guide

    632 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    1041 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Video Course

    Training Course

    368 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    632 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate SAA-C03 Practice Test 88

Question 870

An application reduces idle resource costs without sacrificing peak availability. The team confirms that tests create large EC2 instances and never terminate them. Which design adjustment best addresses that requirement?

  1. Automate resource expiration with tags and lifecycle rules
  2. Configure target tracking and safe scale-in policies
  3. Configure scheduled scale-out ahead of the spike
  4. Scope provisioned concurrency to critical aliases and active hours

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The scenario identifies this requirement: Tests create large EC2 instances and never terminate them. Select Automate resource expiration with tags and lifecycle rules as the specified technical mechanism. Ephemeral environment cleanup reduces orphaned compute cost. This response addresses the problem described rather than a different design goal.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure target tracking and safe scale-in policies would help if containers are held at maximum task count after a weekend burst. Target tracking removes capacity as demand falls. That is not the symptom described here: tests create large EC2 instances and never terminate them. The matching response is Automate resource expiration with tags and lifecycle rules, because ephemeral environment cleanup reduces orphaned compute cost.

C:

For the alternative failure the workload spikes at 9 a.m. daily and scaling arrives late, the control Configure scheduled scale-out ahead of the spike is relevant: predictable capacity can be provisioned before demand. Here the evidence instead is tests create large EC2 instances and never terminate them. The selected technical mechanism is Automate resource expiration with tags and lifecycle rules: ephemeral environment cleanup reduces orphaned compute cost.

D:

Scope provisioned concurrency to critical aliases and active hours solves a different operational problem where a Lambda API has strict low latency but provisioned concurrency is enabled for every function 24/7. Prepared concurrency has ongoing costs even without invocations. It does not directly address tests create large EC2 instances and never terminate them. The case calls for Automate resource expiration with tags and lifecycle rules, since ephemeral environment cleanup reduces orphaned compute cost.

Question 871

A batch computing platform chooses efficient elastic resources. A recent validation shows that ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day. What is the best design response for this workload?

  1. Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking
  2. Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs
  3. Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support
  4. Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The recommended action is: Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support. The evidence is ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day. Batch can scale tasks down when the queue drains. Its technical effect matches the identified failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking would help if a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations. That is not the symptom described here: ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day. The matching response is Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support, because batch can scale tasks down when the queue drains.

B:

For the alternative failure video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance, the control Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs is relevant: managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers. Here the evidence instead is ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day. The selected technical mechanism is Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support: batch can scale tasks down when the queue drains.

D:

The competing option Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency would be useful when a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload. Short event processing fits serverless billing. The present issue is ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day; it is more directly addressed by Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support. Batch can scale tasks down when the queue drains.

Question 872

A batch computing platform chooses efficient elastic resources. During an architecture review, engineers observe that video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance. Which implementation most closely meets this requirement?

  1. Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs
  2. Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling
  3. Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking
  4. Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs is appropriate for the described condition: video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance. Managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers. This is the mechanism that acts on the affected access, service, recovery, or cost boundary.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling solves a different operational problem where a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management. Fargate removes host administration and scales tasks. It does not directly address video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance. The case calls for Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs, since managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers.

C:

The competing option Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking would be useful when a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations. The present issue is video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance; it is more directly addressed by Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs. Managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers.

D:

The option Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support addresses a separate condition: ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day. Batch can scale tasks down when the queue drains. The actual requirement is video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance. Recommended corrective action: Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs. Managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers.

Question 873

A batch computing platform chooses efficient elastic resources. The current operating constraint is that a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload. Which choice directly addresses the documented cause?

  1. Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency
  2. Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking
  3. Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling
  4. Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The requirement concerns a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload. Apply the action: Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency. The causal explanation is that short event processing fits serverless billing. The other options address neighboring conditions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The competing option Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking would be useful when a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations. The present issue is a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload; it is more directly addressed by Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency. Short event processing fits serverless billing.

C:

The option Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling addresses a separate condition: a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management. Fargate removes host administration and scales tasks. The actual requirement is a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload. Recommended corrective action: Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency. Short event processing fits serverless billing.

D:

Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs would help if video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance. Managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers. That is not the symptom described here: a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload. The matching response is Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency, because short event processing fits serverless billing.

Question 874

A batch computing platform chooses efficient elastic resources. The security and operations review finds that a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management. Which design adjustment best addresses that requirement?

  1. Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency
  2. Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling
  3. Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking
  4. Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The case evidence is a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management. The selected response is Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling. Fargate removes host administration and scales tasks. This distinction is why that action is the best answer for the stated situation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The competing option Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency would be useful when a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload. Short event processing fits serverless billing. The present issue is a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management; it is more directly addressed by Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling. Fargate removes host administration and scales tasks.

C:

Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking would help if a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations. That is not the symptom described here: a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management. The matching response is Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling, because fargate removes host administration and scales tasks.

D:

For the alternative failure video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance, the control Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs is relevant: managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers. Here the evidence instead is a containerized application must run a long-lived API without Kubernetes management. The selected technical mechanism is Use ECS on Fargate with task autoscaling: fargate removes host administration and scales tasks.

Question 875

A batch computing platform chooses efficient elastic resources. The business requirement is that a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Which option best matches the identified issue?

  1. Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support
  2. Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking
  3. Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency
  4. Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The scenario identifies this requirement: A custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Select Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking as the specified technical mechanism. Persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations. This response addresses the problem described rather than a different design goal.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The option Use AWS Batch with elastic compute environments and appropriate Spot support addresses a separate condition: ten thousand independent simulations need compute for only two hours per day. Batch can scale tasks down when the queue drains. The actual requirement is a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. Recommended corrective action: Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking. Persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations.

C:

For the alternative failure a workload executes 30-second image transformations upon upload, the control Use Lambda with appropriate memory and concurrency is relevant: short event processing fits serverless billing. Here the evidence instead is a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. The selected technical mechanism is Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking: persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations.

D:

Use AWS Elemental MediaConvert for supported transcoding jobs solves a different operational problem where video processing needs purpose-built managed encoding rather than custom GPU fleet maintenance. Managed conversion avoids maintaining dedicated workers. It does not directly address a custom native workload requires fixed GPUs continuously. The case calls for Evaluate committed accelerated EC2 capacity after benchmarking, since persistent GPU usage can benefit from targeted reservations.

Question 876

A team chooses compute family and memory for cost efficiency. The system is failing this objective: a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. What is the most appropriate correction?

  1. Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates
  2. Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth
  3. Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand
  4. Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The recommended action is: Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs. The evidence is a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. CPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM. Its technical effect matches the identified failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates would help if a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. Memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead. That is not the symptom described here: a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. The matching response is Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs, because cPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM.

B:

For the alternative failure oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower, the control Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth is relevant: instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements. Here the evidence instead is a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. The selected technical mechanism is Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs: cPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM.

C:

Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand solves a different operational problem where a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. Balanced families suit common mixed workloads. It does not directly address a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. The case calls for Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs, since cPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM.

Question 877

A team chooses compute family and memory for cost efficiency. An incident exposes the following failure: a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. What is the best design response for this workload?

  1. Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates
  2. Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs
  3. Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda
  4. Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates is appropriate for the described condition: a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. Memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead. This is the mechanism that acts on the affected access, service, recovery, or cost boundary.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs solves a different operational problem where a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. CPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM. It does not directly address a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. The case calls for Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates, since memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead.

C:

The competing option Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda would be useful when a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script. GPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks. The present issue is a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts; it is more directly addressed by Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates. Memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead.

D:

The option Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand addresses a separate condition: a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. Balanced families suit common mixed workloads. The actual requirement is a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. Recommended corrective action: Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates. Memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead.

Question 878

A team chooses compute family and memory for cost efficiency. The review identifies this gap: a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. Which implementation most closely meets this requirement?

  1. Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand
  2. Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth
  3. Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda
  4. Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The requirement concerns a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. Apply the action: Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand. The causal explanation is that balanced families suit common mixed workloads. The other options address neighboring conditions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The competing option Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth would be useful when oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. Instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements. The present issue is a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements; it is more directly addressed by Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand. Balanced families suit common mixed workloads.

C:

The option Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda addresses a separate condition: a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script. GPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks. The actual requirement is a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. Recommended corrective action: Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand. Balanced families suit common mixed workloads.

D:

Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs would help if a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance. CPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM. That is not the symptom described here: a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. The matching response is Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand, because balanced families suit common mixed workloads.

Question 879

A team chooses compute family and memory for cost efficiency. A deployment test establishes that a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script. Which choice directly addresses the documented cause?

  1. Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates
  2. Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth
  3. Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda
  4. Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The case evidence is a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script. The selected response is Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda. GPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks. This distinction is why that action is the best answer for the stated situation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The competing option Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates would be useful when a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. Memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead. The present issue is a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script; it is more directly addressed by Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda. GPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks.

B:

The option Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth addresses a separate condition: oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. Instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements. The actual requirement is a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script. Recommended corrective action: Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda. GPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks.

D:

For the alternative failure a CPU-bound data transform runs on an expensive memory-optimized instance, the control Move to compute-optimized instances after validating memory needs is relevant: cPU-centric families avoid paying for unused RAM. Here the evidence instead is a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script. The selected technical mechanism is Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda: gPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks.

Question 880

A team chooses compute family and memory for cost efficiency. The team confirms that oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. Which design adjustment best addresses that requirement?

  1. Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth
  2. Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates
  3. Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda
  4. Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The scenario identifies this requirement: Oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth as the specified technical mechanism. Instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements. This response addresses the problem described rather than a different design goal.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Right-size to memory-optimized EC2 if memory pressure dominates would help if a large in-memory analytical cache spills to disk on undersized general-purpose hosts. Memory-optimized instances reduce spill overhead. That is not the symptom described here: oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. The matching response is Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth, because instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements.

C:

For the alternative failure a GPU instance runs a simple CPU-only scheduled script, the control Replace it with suitable CPU instances or Lambda is relevant: gPU capacity is unnecessary for CPU-only tasks. Here the evidence instead is oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. The selected technical mechanism is Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth: instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements.

D:

Use general-purpose EC2 instances sized to observed demand solves a different operational problem where a general web tier has balanced modest CPU and memory requirements. Balanced families suit common mixed workloads. It does not directly address oversized EBS bandwidth is purchased though storage throughput is far lower. The case calls for Select an instance size matching measured network and EBS bandwidth, since instance type choice should reflect actual I/O requirements.