Question 260
A system operator needs to resolve the following: An account must be temporarily prevented from login after a suspected credential compromise. Which proposed change is the most defensible?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Prioritize Lock the password entry and verify alternative login methods are also controlled by policy. The underlying distinction is A password lock can disable password authentication but does not necessarily revoke SSH keys or tokens; use Tests confirm all disallowed authentication methods fail and the incident is recorded as acceptance evidence.
Incorrect Answers
Although that change may be valid elsewhere, it responds to A newly hired analyst has a Linux account but no home directory or default shell, not to this system state. The relevant fix is Lock the password entry and verify alternative login methods are also controlled by policy.
This command or configuration addresses a different case: A user without authorization attempts to create one-time at tasks despite a deny policy. Here, A password lock can disable password authentication but does not necessarily revoke SSH keys or tokens, so the targeted action is Lock the password entry and verify alternative login methods are also controlled by policy.
The alternative fits An audit requires a password change every ninety days for a specific local user. The reported issue instead calls for Lock the password entry and verify alternative login methods are also controlled by policy, as A password lock can disable password authentication but does not necessarily revoke SSH keys or tokens.