Question 150
Which explanation is most relevant when A test host uses 255.255.255.0 but another host in the same VLAN uses 255.255.0.0?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The decisive distinction is Inconsistent subnet masks cause peers to disagree about which destinations are on-link. The targeted configuration is Normalize the intended IPv4 prefixes and verify routing and broadcast behavior; a proper test shows Both hosts resolve the same intended local subnet and communicate through correct routes.
Incorrect Answers
This alternative addresses the separate case “An application binds to port 8443 but remote users cannot connect and the team blames DNS”. Here, A service listening only on loopback cannot accept connections sent to an external interface. The deciding requirement here is “Inconsistent subnet masks cause peers to disagree about which destinations are on-link”.
The proposed principle does not identify the crucial dependency in this case: Inconsistent subnet masks cause peers to disagree about which destinations are on-link.
This would be the main explanation for An IPv6 interface displays an fe80:: address and an operator expects Internet-wide routing. It does not account for A test host uses 255.255.255.0 but another host in the same VLAN uses 255.255.0.0.