mcAfee Secure Website
23

LPI 010-160 Bundle

Exam Code: 010-160

Exam Name Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6

Certification Provider: LPI

Corresponding Certification: Linux Essentials

010-160 Training Materials $44.99

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for 010-160 Exam Success

The Latest 010-160 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    010-160 Questions & Answers

    80 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    010-160 Video Course

    010-160 Training Course

    78 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    010-160 Study Guide

    364 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

Linux Essentials Certificate Exam, version 1.6 (010-160) Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable LPI Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    80 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    010-160 Video Course

    Training Course

    78 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    364 PDF Pages

    $29.99

LPI 010-160 Practice Test 20

Question 190

In an introductory Linux course scenario, the class finds: A learner sets chmod 777 on a private script because it is the only number they remember, giving every user write access when only its owner needs to edit it. What is the principal cause of this result?

  1. The /etc/skel directory conventionally supplies default initial home-directory content for user creation, separate from arbitrary existing home files.
  2. Numeric Unix permission digits combine read 4, write 2 and execute 1 bits for owner, group and other classes.
  3. Linux permission mode bits distinguish owner, group and other access and can be modified with symbolic chmod operations.
  4. Configured local accounts and active login sessions are different records; tools such as who and w report current logged-in users.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The technical basis is: Numeric Unix permission digits combine read 4, write 2 and execute 1 bits for owner, group and other classes. Resolve this through: Set a least-privilege numeric mode appropriate for the script's intended owner and authorized readers or executors. The expected evidence is: A long listing decodes to the intended owner, group and other permissions and an unauthorized account cannot modify the script.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The /etc/skel directory conventionally supplies default initial home-directory content for user creation, separate from arbitrary existing home files. “Configure approved generic starter files in /etc/skel and create a disposable test user with the appropriate home creation settings” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: numeric Unix permission digits combine read 4, write 2 and execute 1 bits for owner, group and other classes.

C:

“Apply the intended symbolic chmod change to remove other-read access while retaining necessary owner and group permissions” is the supported response when linux permission mode bits distinguish owner, group and other access and can be modified with symbolic chmod operations. Here the decisive response is “Set a least-privilege numeric mode appropriate for the script's intended owner and authorized readers or executors”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

Configured local accounts and active login sessions are different records; tools such as who and w report current logged-in users. “Use who or w to inspect active sessions and separately consult account metadata for the list of created users” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a learner sets chmod 777 on a private script because it is the only number they remember, giving every user write access when only its owner needs to edit it; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 191

An instructor reviews this Linux fundamentals exercise: A training machine offers a shared writable temporary directory and one student is able to delete another student's files despite not owning them. Which supported corrective action most directly addresses the problem?

  1. Create or inspect a symbolic link using ln -s and an appropriate listing, then distinguish removal of the link from removal of the target.
  2. Set the intended owning group and suitable group permissions with authorized filesystem tools after confirming account memberships.
  3. Grant the minimum search or execute permission needed to traverse the intended directory and preserve appropriate protections on its files.
  4. Use the appropriate sticky-bit directory permissions for an approved shared temporary directory without making all individual files public.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The main issue is: The sticky bit on a shared writable directory restricts removal or renaming of entries by unrelated users, subject to ownership and privilege rules. The appropriate correction is: Use the appropriate sticky-bit directory permissions for an approved shared temporary directory without making all individual files public. Verify success by checking: Two users can create their own temporary files, but an ordinary unrelated user cannot remove the other's protected entry.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This action addresses symbolic link points to a separate target pathname, whose causal condition is: A symbolic link is a filesystem entry that refers to another pathname and can exist independently of the continued existence of its target. The current scenario instead requires attention to: The sticky bit on a shared writable directory restricts removal or renaming of entries by unrelated users, subject to ownership and privilege rules.

B:

This action addresses shared group directory access after ownership change, whose causal condition is: Directory owner, owning group and mode bits collectively determine ordinary discretionary access; changing one owner field alone is insufficient. In this question the necessary remedy is “Use the appropriate sticky-bit directory permissions for an approved shared temporary directory without making all individual files public”, which this alternative does not provide.

C:

This action addresses directory execute permission controls traversal, whose causal condition is: For directories the execute bit governs path traversal, while directory read permission primarily permits listing entry names. The observed condition is a training machine offers a shared writable temporary directory and one student is able to delete another student's files despite not owning them; this mechanism addresses another problem.

Question 192

Before approving this basic Linux procedure, the team observes: A user needs to inspect historical application messages but searches only the /etc configuration tree and concludes the system never recorded an event. What ongoing quality or security safeguard is most appropriate?

  1. Separate process-state evidence from software installation lists when interpreting performance and troubleshooting output.
  2. Use documentation to identify the real configuration file instead of inferring it from the location of recent log messages.
  3. Never guess a destructive storage target from generic device-name examples without verifying the actual connected hardware.
  4. Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This safeguard addresses linux log files stored under var log: Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records. The prevented failure mechanism is: Linux services often write ordinary log files under /var/log or an installed logging system rather than into their /etc configuration files. A control for an unrelated service cannot establish the required protection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Executable files stored on disk are not the same as running processes; the ps command reports process information at the time of inspection. “Separate process-state evidence from software installation lists when interpreting performance and troubleshooting output” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: linux services often write ordinary log files under /var/log or an installed logging system rather than into their /etc configuration files.

B:

“Use documentation to identify the real configuration file instead of inferring it from the location of recent log messages” is the supported response when linux conventionally separates many configuration files under /etc from program logs and other generated state stored in different paths. Here the decisive response is “Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

C:

Linux block devices may use naming schemes such as /dev/sd* or /dev/nvme* depending on the storage controller and device class. “Never guess a destructive storage target from generic device-name examples without verifying the actual connected hardware” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a user needs to inspect historical application messages but searches only the /etc configuration tree and concludes the system never recorded an event; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 193

A beginner using a Linux terminal discovers: A student runs rmdir logs against a directory containing a log file and assumes the utility failed because they lack superuser privileges. What ongoing quality or security safeguard is most appropriate?

  1. Test environment visibility in child processes rather than assuming a local shell variable automatically becomes globally available.
  2. Preview wildcard matches before executing delete or move commands that could affect more files than intended.
  3. Prefer empty-directory removal for cleanup tasks when unexpected contents should cause a safe failure instead of recursive deletion.
  4. Check command type when an interactive shell behaves differently from noninteractive scripts or published examples.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This safeguard addresses rmdir rejects a directory containing files: Prefer empty-directory removal for cleanup tasks when unexpected contents should cause a safe failure instead of recursive deletion. The prevented failure mechanism is: The rmdir utility is intended for empty directories and refuses to remove a directory that still contains entries. A control for an unrelated service cannot establish the required protection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An ordinary shell variable is scoped to the current shell, while exported environment variables are passed to child processes. “Test environment visibility in child processes rather than assuming a local shell variable automatically becomes globally available” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: the rmdir utility is intended for empty directories and refuses to remove a directory that still contains entries.

B:

“Preview wildcard matches before executing delete or move commands that could affect more files than intended” is the supported response when for normal unquoted filename patterns, Bash pathname expansion substitutes matching directory entries before the command receives its arguments. Here the decisive response is “Prefer empty-directory removal for cleanup tasks when unexpected contents should cause a safe failure instead of recursive deletion”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

Shell command names may resolve to aliases, functions, builtins or filesystem executables; a printed name alone does not identify the actual target. “Check command type when an interactive shell behaves differently from noninteractive scripts or published examples” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a student runs rmdir logs against a directory containing a log file and assumes the utility failed because they lack superuser privileges; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 194

A beginner using a Linux terminal discovers: A learner in /home/student/projects tries to reach /home/student by typing cd /.. and ends up at the filesystem root instead. Which configuration step should the team implement first?

  1. Run cd .. from the correct current directory or supply the explicit desired absolute directory.
  2. Run find from the appropriate search root with a quoted name pattern and review matches before taking further action.
  3. Use a supported tilde-based home path or the HOME variable appropriately when constructing a personal file location.
  4. Use ls -a in the relevant directory to include hidden files and directories while inspecting configuration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The main issue is: Relative .. refers to the parent of the current directory, while a leading slash restarts path resolution at the root directory. The appropriate correction is: Run cd .. from the correct current directory or supply the explicit desired absolute directory. Verify success by checking: The working directory changes from /home/student/projects to /home/student without unexpectedly returning to /.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This action addresses find directory tree by filename pattern, whose causal condition is: A filesystem search utility such as find can traverse directories and filter entries by name and other supported properties. The current scenario instead requires attention to: Relative .. refers to the parent of the current directory, while a leading slash restarts path resolution at the root directory.

C:

This action addresses tilde expansion returns user home directory, whose causal condition is: The shell can expand a leading tilde into the current user's configured home directory, avoiding assumptions about account names. In this question the necessary remedy is “Run cd .. from the correct current directory or supply the explicit desired absolute directory”, which this alternative does not provide.

D:

This action addresses hidden dot files omitted by default list, whose causal condition is: Names beginning with a dot are conventionally hidden from normal directory listing output unless an appropriate option is provided. The observed condition is a learner in /home/student/projects tries to reach /home/student by typing cd /.. and ends up at the filesystem root instead; this mechanism addresses another problem.

Question 195

An entry-level Linux support technician investigates: A device driver fails to initialize after a hardware change, but the trainee searches only their personal shell history for an explanation of kernel-level events. Which preventive control should be standardized to avoid recurrence?

  1. Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records.
  2. Separate process-state evidence from software installation lists when interpreting performance and troubleshooting output.
  3. Use kernel event evidence where appropriate and avoid exposing sensitive system diagnostics to unauthorized users.
  4. Measure resource use over an appropriate interval instead of equating a process name or configuration entry with current consumption.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This safeguard addresses dmesg shows kernel message ring buffer: Use kernel event evidence where appropriate and avoid exposing sensitive system diagnostics to unauthorized users. The prevented failure mechanism is: Kernel messages can be examined with dmesg and may record hardware detection and driver failures independently of shell command history. A control for an unrelated service cannot establish the required protection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Linux services often write ordinary log files under /var/log or an installed logging system rather than into their /etc configuration files. “Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: kernel messages can be examined with dmesg and may record hardware detection and driver failures independently of shell command history.

B:

“Separate process-state evidence from software installation lists when interpreting performance and troubleshooting output” is the supported response when executable files stored on disk are not the same as running processes; the ps command reports process information at the time of inspection. Here the decisive response is “Use kernel event evidence where appropriate and avoid exposing sensitive system diagnostics to unauthorized users”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

The top utility provides an interactive view of running tasks and CPU or memory activity that changes while the system runs. “Measure resource use over an appropriate interval instead of equating a process name or configuration entry with current consumption” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a device driver fails to initialize after a hardware change, but the trainee searches only their personal shell history for an explanation of kernel-level events; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 196

An instructor reviews this Linux fundamentals exercise: A trainee types a command against home/student/report.txt while working in another directory and cannot understand why the file is not found. Which observed outcome confirms that the Linux operation works as intended?

  1. A test read reaches the intended file regardless of the caller's prior working directory when its absolute path is used.
  2. Command resolution reports the expected executable location and a test invocation produces the output of the intended program.
  3. The installed package's local documentation is located and consulted without relying on a third-party download.
  4. The student identifies the valid command-line flags and can explain the effect of a chosen combination without guessing.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This specifically verifies absolute path starts at filesystem root: A test read reaches the intended file regardless of the caller's prior working directory when its absolute path is used. The related engineering correction is: Use the appropriate absolute path starting at / or deliberately change into the required base directory before invoking the command. Evidence from another workflow would not establish the stated outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Command resolution reports the expected executable location and a test invocation produces the output of the intended program. “Inspect the effective PATH and command resolution and invoke the intended executable with its full path or change the supported search order” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: a test read reaches the intended file regardless of the caller's prior working directory when its absolute path is used.

C:

“Inspect the appropriate package documentation directory and use local README files or examples to learn intended usage” is the supported response when the installed package's local documentation is located and consulted without relying on a third-party download. Here the decisive response is “Use the appropriate absolute path starting at / or deliberately change into the required base directory before invoking the command”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

The student identifies the valid command-line flags and can explain the effect of a chosen combination without guessing. “Run the utility's supported help flag for basic syntax and consult its manual for deeper option semantics” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a trainee types a command against home/student/report.txt while working in another directory and cannot understand why the file is not found; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 197

A beginner using a Linux terminal discovers: A student assumes every solid-state drive appears as /dev/sda and cannot identify an NVMe device shown under a different Linux block device naming convention. What ongoing quality or security safeguard is most appropriate?

  1. Record distro and release channel versions before making stability or long-term support claims about a Linux deployment.
  2. Check kernel and distribution hardware compatibility before buying or deploying unfamiliar peripherals across a large fleet.
  3. Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records.
  4. Never guess a destructive storage target from generic device-name examples without verifying the actual connected hardware.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This safeguard addresses storage device path for block drives and partitions: Never guess a destructive storage target from generic device-name examples without verifying the actual connected hardware. The prevented failure mechanism is: Linux block devices may use naming schemes such as /dev/sd* or /dev/nvme* depending on the storage controller and device class. A control for an unrelated service cannot establish the required protection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Linux release channels differ in update cadence, validation and support policy; testing packages may change more frequently than stable ones. “Record distro and release channel versions before making stability or long-term support claims about a Linux deployment” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: linux block devices may use naming schemes such as /dev/sd* or /dev/nvme* depending on the storage controller and device class.

B:

“Check kernel and distribution hardware compatibility before buying or deploying unfamiliar peripherals across a large fleet” is the supported response when peripheral hardware requires suitable kernel driver support before userspace networking tools can configure it as a functional interface. Here the decisive response is “Never guess a destructive storage target from generic device-name examples without verifying the actual connected hardware”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

C:

Linux services often write ordinary log files under /var/log or an installed logging system rather than into their /etc configuration files. “Know which service log location actually applies and avoid confusing application configuration files with generated diagnostic records” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a student assumes every solid-state drive appears as /dev/sda and cannot identify an NVMe device shown under a different Linux block device naming convention; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 198

An entry-level Linux support technician investigates: A learner wants to recall a safe command typed earlier but assumes Bash forgets all previously entered commands as soon as the prompt returns. Which limitation most directly accounts for the reported behavior?

  1. Names beginning with a dot are conventionally hidden from normal directory listing output unless an appropriate option is provided.
  2. Bash can maintain an in-session command history, and persistent history behavior depends on shell configuration and session lifecycle.
  3. The shell searches PATH entries in order for commands that do not specify an explicit executable path.
  4. Shell command names may resolve to aliases, functions, builtins or filesystem executables; a printed name alone does not identify the actual target.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The technical basis is: Bash can maintain an in-session command history, and persistent history behavior depends on shell configuration and session lifecycle. Resolve this through: Use the built-in history display or an approved history navigation shortcut to locate and selectively rerun the intended command. The expected evidence is: The prior harmless command appears in the history list and can be reviewed before being repeated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Names beginning with a dot are conventionally hidden from normal directory listing output unless an appropriate option is provided. “Use ls -a in the relevant directory to include hidden files and directories while inspecting configuration” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: bash can maintain an in-session command history, and persistent history behavior depends on shell configuration and session lifecycle.

C:

“Inspect the effective PATH and command resolution and invoke the intended executable with its full path or change the supported search order” is the supported response when the shell searches PATH entries in order for commands that do not specify an explicit executable path. Here the decisive response is “Use the built-in history display or an approved history navigation shortcut to locate and selectively rerun the intended command”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

Shell command names may resolve to aliases, functions, builtins or filesystem executables; a printed name alone does not identify the actual target. “Use the Bash type builtin to inspect how the command resolves before modifying a script or calling a different executable” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a learner wants to recall a safe command typed earlier but assumes Bash forgets all previously entered commands as soon as the prompt returns; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 199

Before approving this basic Linux procedure, the team observes: A learner writes a text file containing Bash commands and marks it executable, but an automation launcher cannot determine which interpreter should execute the file reliably. What test finding most directly confirms successful remediation?

  1. The same short script runs when invoked directly and prints the expected output through the intended Bash interpreter.
  2. A deliberately failing test command returns nonzero and the script reports failure rather than pretending the operation completed.
  3. The chosen command displays the expected final test events without reading and printing the entire log.
  4. The trainee can scroll to a middle section and exit back to the shell without modifying the original file.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

This specifically verifies shebang selects interpreter for executable script: The same short script runs when invoked directly and prints the expected output through the intended Bash interpreter. The related engineering correction is: Place an appropriate supported Bash interpreter directive at the first line and confirm the path exists on the training system. Evidence from another workflow would not establish the stated outcome.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A deliberately failing test command returns nonzero and the script reports failure rather than pretending the operation completed. “Inspect the command's exit status and use a conditional check before starting the next dependent step” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: the same short script runs when invoked directly and prints the expected output through the intended Bash interpreter.

C:

“Use tail with a suitable line count to inspect the latest stored lines and head when the first records are needed” is the supported response when the chosen command displays the expected final test events without reading and printing the entire log. Here the decisive response is “Place an appropriate supported Bash interpreter directive at the first line and confirm the path exists on the training system”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

The trainee can scroll to a middle section and exit back to the shell without modifying the original file. “Open the output in less and use supported navigation or search keys to inspect the desired section” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a learner writes a text file containing Bash commands and marks it executable, but an automation launcher cannot determine which interpreter should execute the file reliably; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.

Question 200

An instructor reviews this Linux fundamentals exercise: A small business needs Windows and Linux staff to exchange files through a shared folder but chooses NFS solely because every computer on the network uses IP. Which monitoring practice would best limit a repeat of this weakness?

  1. Check the exact license version and distribution conditions before promising proprietary-only redistribution of copyleft code.
  2. Classify software by its purpose and avoid substituting document editing tools for a persistent relational data service.
  3. Select the network file-sharing protocol based on client compatibility and permissions, not simply network connectivity.
  4. Match open source application selection to actual document, media or development tasks rather than to licensing alone.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This safeguard addresses samba windows network share interoperability: Select the network file-sharing protocol based on client compatibility and permissions, not simply network connectivity. The prevented failure mechanism is: Samba commonly implements SMB interoperability with Windows file-sharing clients, while NFS uses a different file-sharing protocol and ecosystem. A control for an unrelated service cannot establish the required protection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

GPL-style copyleft licenses attach specified source availability and licensing requirements to redistributed derivative software under their terms. “Check the exact license version and distribution conditions before promising proprietary-only redistribution of copyleft code” would remedy that alternative situation, but it would not correct the present issue: samba commonly implements SMB interoperability with Windows file-sharing clients, while NFS uses a different file-sharing protocol and ecosystem.

B:

“Classify software by its purpose and avoid substituting document editing tools for a persistent relational data service” is the supported response when mariaDB and PostgreSQL are database management systems that maintain structured tables and queries, unlike a simple text editing application. Here the decisive response is “Select the network file-sharing protocol based on client compatibility and permissions, not simply network connectivity”, so that different intervention does not meet the stated requirement.

D:

Open source licensing does not imply identical application roles; LibreOffice provides office document and spreadsheet editing functionality. “Match open source application selection to actual document, media or development tasks rather than to licensing alone” applies to that other condition. The reported evidence is a small business needs Windows and Linux staff to exchange files through a shared folder but chooses NFS solely because every computer on the network uses IP; this alternative would address the wrong dependency.