Question 670
The HPE AOS-CX switching case is: A large group receives a new image but no one validates the actual routing and authentication state afterward. Which TWO choices together provide the targeted remedy and independent validation? (Select TWO.)
Explanation
Correct Answers
The targeted correction for A large group receives a new image but no one validates the actual routing and authentication state afterward is: Use supported Central scheduling, device groups, firmware compliance and post-upgrade validation instead of treating a portal job as proof of healthy operation. It reduces the risk that a queued or blocked Central operation can leave some switches on old software while dashboards imply the deployment finished.
A separate operational validation for A large group receives a new image but no one validates the actual routing and authentication state afterward is: A group inventory reports the expected installed version for each reachable switch and the configured services pass smoke tests. It proves intended behavior instead of accepting configuration presence alone.
Incorrect Answers
This alternative concerns handoff documentation and operational runbook maintenance; its associated risk is: Unrecorded VLAN or peer-role changes can turn routine incidents into extended outages and make compliance review unreliable. The observed case A large group receives a new image but no one validates the actual routing and authentication state afterward requires the more specific central firmware and group compliance rollouts control. The targeted action is: Use supported Central scheduling, device groups, firmware compliance and post-upgrade validation instead of treating a portal job as proof of healthy operation.
This alternative concerns maintenance window communication and change approval; its associated risk is: A technically correct change performed without coordination can interrupt critical services and prevent recovery within the approved outage allowance. The observed case A large group receives a new image but no one validates the actual routing and authentication state afterward requires the more specific central firmware and group compliance rollouts control. The targeted action is: Use supported Central scheduling, device groups, firmware compliance and post-upgrade validation instead of treating a portal job as proof of healthy operation.
This alternative concerns scheduled configuration audit and desired-state compliance; its associated risk is: Undetected local overrides and drift can accumulate across branches and weaken segmentation or network reliability. The observed case A large group receives a new image but no one validates the actual routing and authentication state afterward requires the more specific central firmware and group compliance rollouts control. The targeted action is: Use supported Central scheduling, device groups, firmware compliance and post-upgrade validation instead of treating a portal job as proof of healthy operation.