Question 320
The HPE AOS-CX switching case is: A newly added VLAN has IGMP receivers but no PIM-enabled gateway interface for routed delivery. Select TWO: a corrective switching action and separate evidence that the correction worked. (Select TWO.)
Explanation
Correct Answers
The targeted correction for A newly added VLAN has IGMP receivers but no PIM-enabled gateway interface for routed delivery is: Plan PIM-enabled supported routed interfaces, unicast RPF reachability and rendezvous-point requirements for cross-subnet multicast. It reduces the risk that correct IGMP join behavior at a receiver does not create an inter-VLAN multicast path without the appropriate routed multicast control plane.
A separate operational validation for A newly added VLAN has IGMP receivers but no PIM-enabled gateway interface for routed delivery is: A source and receiver in separate test subnets exchange multicast while RPF and PIM neighbor states match the design. It proves intended behavior instead of accepting configuration presence alone.
Incorrect Answers
This alternative concerns ospf area and neighbor formation; its associated risk is: An OSPF neighbor mismatch can leave a physical link working while required prefixes never populate the routing table. The observed case A newly added VLAN has IGMP receivers but no PIM-enabled gateway interface for routed delivery requires the more specific pim sparse-mode and routed multicast control control. The targeted action is: Plan PIM-enabled supported routed interfaces, unicast RPF reachability and rendezvous-point requirements for cross-subnet multicast.
This alternative concerns rack transceiver compatibility and link budget; its associated risk is: Unsupported optic combinations or bad attenuation can cause intermittent errors even when the link initially reports carrier. The observed case A newly added VLAN has IGMP receivers but no PIM-enabled gateway interface for routed delivery requires the more specific pim sparse-mode and routed multicast control control. The targeted action is: Plan PIM-enabled supported routed interfaces, unicast RPF reachability and rendezvous-point requirements for cross-subnet multicast.
This alternative concerns igmp snooping querier and multicast receiver membership; its associated risk is: Without valid membership state, multicast can flood unrelated access ports or fail to reach intended receivers. The observed case A newly added VLAN has IGMP receivers but no PIM-enabled gateway interface for routed delivery requires the more specific pim sparse-mode and routed multicast control control. The targeted action is: Plan PIM-enabled supported routed interfaces, unicast RPF reachability and rendezvous-point requirements for cross-subnet multicast.