Question 850
At East Student Center, an AP has Internet management but no functional user-tunnel path to the gateways. What operational rule should remain in place for later changes?
Explanation
Correct Answer
For East Student Center, the decisive mechanism is AOS 10 tunnel forwarding. Tunnel forwarding places client data on the gateway datapath rather than a local bridged VLAN. Plan gateway redundancy and capacity for tunneled WLAN clients is an enduring limitation on the operational risk, not simply a one-time passing test.
Incorrect Answers
This is relevant to RF predictive versus active survey, where predictive RF planning does not replace measured real-world attenuation and utilization In the East Student Center case, A precaution for another failure mode is not the enduring boundary needed here. The specific mechanism is tunnel forwarding places client data on the gateway datapath rather than a local bridged VLAN
This is relevant to Co-channel contention, where co-channel APs share contention airtime even if their signals are individually strong In the East Student Center case, A precaution for another failure mode is not the enduring boundary needed here. The specific mechanism is tunnel forwarding places client data on the gateway datapath rather than a local bridged VLAN
This is relevant to RSSI and SNR differentiation, where sNR accounts for interference floor; RSSI alone does not predict useful wireless throughput In the East Student Center case, A precaution for another failure mode is not the enduring boundary needed here. The specific mechanism is tunnel forwarding places client data on the gateway datapath rather than a local bridged VLAN