Question 840
At Research Hub, slow legacy clients monopolize airtime in a busy classroom WLAN. Which TWO responses together provide a direct implementation and a continuing safeguard for the stated risk? Select TWO answers.
Explanation
Correct Answers
This is the implementation element for the Research Hub case: Wireless medium contention occurs in airtime; equal frame counts do not imply fair capacity. The specific action Tune supported airtime-fairness behavior based on client mix and user experience addresses the stated fault; the question also requires a persistent risk control.
This is the continuing risk-control element for Research Hub. Do not starve essential low-rate devices solely to maximize aggregate throughput prevents a future regression or unauthorized relaxation of the repair; it complements, rather than replaces, the implementation.
Incorrect Answers
This may be a configuration step for RF predictive versus active survey: Predictive RF planning does not replace measured real-world attenuation and utilization. It does not resolve the Airtime fairness requirement in Research Hub and is not one of the two controls requested. The direct mechanism here is wireless medium contention occurs in airtime; equal frame counts do not imply fair capacity
This may be an ongoing precaution for RSSI and SNR differentiation: SNR accounts for interference floor; RSSI alone does not predict useful wireless throughput. It does not resolve the Airtime fairness requirement in Research Hub and is not one of the two controls requested. The direct mechanism here is wireless medium contention occurs in airtime; equal frame counts do not imply fair capacity