Question 170
Two access switches are intended to share one LACP uplink bundle, but an engineer puts one member in `channel-group 9` and the other local member in `channel-group 10`. What should be corrected?
Explanation
Correct Answer
An EtherChannel is represented by one logical port-channel interface per local group. Assigning intended members to two separate local group numbers creates two different channel interfaces rather than one bundle. The peer’s group number itself need not numerically match, but member characteristics and negotiation must be compatible across the link.
Incorrect Answers
Layer 2 port-channel members do not normally receive duplicate routed interface addresses. This introduces addressing conflict rather than resolving grouping.
Local channel-group numbers are configuration identifiers and need not match between two switches. The crucial issue is the consistency of each device’s intended member grouping and LACP compatibility.
Different local channel groups are distinct logical bundles, not one multi-link aggregation. This violates the request to combine both physical uplinks.