mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 49

Question 480

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A security team needs to isolate internet egress for different migrated divisions. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Connect networks through approved Direct Connect or Site-to-Site VPN with correct routes
  2. Redesign IP allocation or introduce scoped translation/proxy connectivity
  3. Configure proper ALB target groups, VPC routes and security-group references
  4. Segment VPC and Transit Gateway route tables and apply centrally inspected egress

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Segment VPC and Transit Gateway route tables and apply centrally inspected egress. Segmented routing limits shared east-west access among migration tenants.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Connect networks through approved Direct Connect or Site-to-Site VPN with correct routes would address a different requirement: An application moved to private AWS subnets must retain a secure private path to its on-premises database during transition. Hybrid transport and routing are needed while database calls remain on-premises.

B:

This alternative, Redesign IP allocation or introduce scoped translation/proxy connectivity, is appropriate when A migrated service's VPC overlaps an acquired subsidiary's on-premises address space. Direct routed VPC connectivity cannot transparently handle overlapping CIDR blocks.

C:

For the separate situation A new public ALB must call migrated app tasks hosted only in private subnets, Configure proper ALB target groups, VPC routes and security-group references could be useful. The ALB accepts public ingress while its registered targets remain privately addressed.

Question 481

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A scheduled ETL polling service has no work outside short nightly runs. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits
  2. Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer
  3. Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states
  4. Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits. Scheduled on-demand serverless execution avoids continuously provisioned idle hosts.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer solves the related scenario A lightweight data API runs unpredictable bursts and requires managed authentication and request throttling; API Gateway centralizes API policy while Lambda scales invocation-driven compute.

C:

Although Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states can be valid when A multi-step order workflow must wait for a human approval and resume on timeout, it targets a different technical condition. Durable state-machine transitions handle multi-step asynchronous approvals.

D:

Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute would address a different requirement: An application has one monthly batch run that lasts much longer than Lambda's maximum runtime. Long tasks require a compute environment without Lambda's invocation-duration cap.

Question 482

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A monolith emits simple image thumbnail tasks that can run independently from the API response. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer
  2. Move thumbnail work to S3 event notifications and Lambda with idempotency safeguards
  3. Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states
  4. Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Move thumbnail work to S3 event notifications and Lambda with idempotency safeguards. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer solves the related scenario A lightweight data API runs unpredictable bursts and requires managed authentication and request throttling; API Gateway centralizes API policy while Lambda scales invocation-driven compute.

C:

Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states would address a different requirement: A multi-step order workflow must wait for a human approval and resume on timeout. Durable state-machine transitions handle multi-step asynchronous approvals.

D:

This alternative, Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits, is appropriate when A scheduled ETL polling service has no work outside short nightly runs. Scheduled on-demand serverless execution avoids continuously provisioned idle hosts.

Question 483

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: A lightweight data API runs unpredictable bursts and requires managed authentication and request throttling. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute
  2. Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits
  3. Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer
  4. Move thumbnail work to S3 event notifications and Lambda with idempotency safeguards

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer. API Gateway centralizes API policy while Lambda scales invocation-driven compute.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute can be valid when An application has one monthly batch run that lasts much longer than Lambda's maximum runtime, it targets a different technical condition. Long tasks require a compute environment without Lambda's invocation-duration cap.

B:

Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits would address a different requirement: A scheduled ETL polling service has no work outside short nightly runs. Scheduled on-demand serverless execution avoids continuously provisioned idle hosts.

D:

For the separate situation A monolith emits simple image thumbnail tasks that can run independently from the API response, Move thumbnail work to S3 event notifications and Lambda with idempotency safeguards could be useful. Object-event-driven compute decouples background image processing from the frontend.

Question 484

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A multi-step order workflow must wait for a human approval and resume on timeout. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits
  2. Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states
  3. Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer
  4. Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states. Durable state-machine transitions handle multi-step asynchronous approvals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replace its long-running polling host with EventBridge Scheduler and Lambda where execution fits would address a different requirement: A scheduled ETL polling service has no work outside short nightly runs. Scheduled on-demand serverless execution avoids continuously provisioned idle hosts.

C:

For the separate situation A lightweight data API runs unpredictable bursts and requires managed authentication and request throttling, Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer could be useful. API Gateway centralizes API policy while Lambda scales invocation-driven compute.

D:

Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute solves the related scenario An application has one monthly batch run that lasts much longer than Lambda's maximum runtime; long tasks require a compute environment without Lambda's invocation-duration cap.

Question 485

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: An application has one monthly batch run that lasts much longer than Lambda's maximum runtime. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer
  2. Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute
  3. Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states
  4. Move thumbnail work to S3 event notifications and Lambda with idempotency safeguards

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use ECS Fargate scheduled tasks or an appropriate batch service for long-running compute. Long tasks require a compute environment without Lambda's invocation-duration cap.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Use API Gateway with Lambda integration and an appropriate authorizer, is appropriate when A lightweight data API runs unpredictable bursts and requires managed authentication and request throttling. API Gateway centralizes API policy while Lambda scales invocation-driven compute.

C:

Implement Step Functions orchestration with explicit approval and timeout states solves the related scenario A multi-step order workflow must wait for a human approval and resume on timeout; durable state-machine transitions handle multi-step asynchronous approvals.

D:

Although Move thumbnail work to S3 event notifications and Lambda with idempotency safeguards can be valid when A monolith emits simple image thumbnail tasks that can run independently from the API response, it targets a different technical condition. Object-event-driven compute decouples background image processing from the frontend.

Question 486

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A monolith holds incoming orders synchronously while a slow inventory system responds. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications
  2. Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates
  3. Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers
  4. Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers. Queued work absorbs dependency latency and separates acceptance from processing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications solves the related scenario A company wants all new services to synchronously call one centralized orchestrator for simple notifications; asynchronous fanout avoids unnecessary runtime coupling through a central synchronous service.

B:

Although Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates can be valid when A payment event may be delivered twice during migration and could double-charge customers, it targets a different technical condition. At-least-once messaging requires business-level deduplication of side effects.

D:

This alternative, Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions, is appropriate when A billing service must receive every product-created event without depending on the catalog service's uptime. Event buses decouple producers from independently available consumers.

Question 487

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: A billing service must receive every product-created event without depending on the catalog service's uptime. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates
  2. Assign data ownership and introduce a versioned API or events between the services
  3. Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications
  4. Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions. Event buses decouple producers from independently available consumers.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates can be valid when A payment event may be delivered twice during migration and could double-charge customers, it targets a different technical condition. At-least-once messaging requires business-level deduplication of side effects.

B:

Assign data ownership and introduce a versioned API or events between the services would address a different requirement: A migration extracts customer profiles into a new service but shared database tables cause accidental cross-service writes. Service isolation requires explicit state ownership rather than shared mutable tables.

C:

This alternative, Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications, is appropriate when A company wants all new services to synchronously call one centralized orchestrator for simple notifications. Asynchronous fanout avoids unnecessary runtime coupling through a central synchronous service.

Question 488

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A migration extracts customer profiles into a new service but shared database tables cause accidental cross-service writes. What should the architect implement?

  1. Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers
  2. Assign data ownership and introduce a versioned API or events between the services
  3. Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions
  4. Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Assign data ownership and introduce a versioned API or events between the services. Service isolation requires explicit state ownership rather than shared mutable tables.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers would address a different requirement: A monolith holds incoming orders synchronously while a slow inventory system responds. Queued work absorbs dependency latency and separates acceptance from processing.

C:

For the separate situation A billing service must receive every product-created event without depending on the catalog service's uptime, Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions could be useful. Event buses decouple producers from independently available consumers.

D:

Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications solves the related scenario A company wants all new services to synchronously call one centralized orchestrator for simple notifications; asynchronous fanout avoids unnecessary runtime coupling through a central synchronous service.

Question 489

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A company wants all new services to synchronously call one centralized orchestrator for simple notifications. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions
  2. Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications
  3. Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates
  4. Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications. Asynchronous fanout avoids unnecessary runtime coupling through a central synchronous service.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Publish domain events to EventBridge and configure independent downstream subscriptions, is appropriate when A billing service must receive every product-created event without depending on the catalog service's uptime. Event buses decouple producers from independently available consumers.

C:

Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates solves the related scenario A payment event may be delivered twice during migration and could double-charge customers; at-least-once messaging requires business-level deduplication of side effects.

D:

Although Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers can be valid when A monolith holds incoming orders synchronously while a slow inventory system responds, it targets a different technical condition. Queued work absorbs dependency latency and separates acceptance from processing.

Question 490

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A payment event may be delivered twice during migration and could double-charge customers. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications
  2. Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers
  3. Assign data ownership and introduce a versioned API or events between the services
  4. Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Implement application idempotency keys and conditional transaction updates. At-least-once messaging requires business-level deduplication of side effects.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A company wants all new services to synchronously call one centralized orchestrator for simple notifications, Prefer SNS fanout or EventBridge pub-sub for independent subscriber notifications could be useful. Asynchronous fanout avoids unnecessary runtime coupling through a central synchronous service.

B:

Introduce an SQS queue and idempotent inventory consumers solves the related scenario A monolith holds incoming orders synchronously while a slow inventory system responds; queued work absorbs dependency latency and separates acceptance from processing.

C:

Although Assign data ownership and introduce a versioned API or events between the services can be valid when A migration extracts customer profiles into a new service but shared database tables cause accidental cross-service writes, it targets a different technical condition. Service isolation requires explicit state ownership rather than shared mutable tables.