mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 33

Question 320

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A team discovers many EC2 vulnerabilities but needs severity-based patch queues. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Aggregate Amazon Inspector findings and prioritize by exploit risk and asset criticality
  2. Centralize Security Hub aggregation and route prioritized findings via EventBridge
  3. Associate AWS Config noncompliance events with approved remediation automation
  4. Investigate GuardDuty findings and isolate the affected workload through approved response

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Aggregate Amazon Inspector findings and prioritize by exploit risk and asset criticality. Inspector identifies vulnerabilities so remediation can be based on risk rather than ad hoc scanning.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Centralize Security Hub aggregation and route prioritized findings via EventBridge can be valid when Security Hub findings are scattered across accounts and remediation owners miss severe issues, it targets a different technical condition. A consolidated posture dashboard plus event routing improves remediation ownership.

C:

Associate AWS Config noncompliance events with approved remediation automation would address a different requirement: A regulated service needs to track and remediate public S3 buckets immediately after configuration drift. Config rule state changes can trigger controlled repair when resource policy becomes unsafe.

D:

This alternative, Investigate GuardDuty findings and isolate the affected workload through approved response, is appropriate when An EKS node begins making suspicious DNS queries to an apparent command-and-control domain. Threat-detection signals identify anomalous behavior but require triage and containment.

Question 321

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: A critical Linux fleet needs predictable security patch compliance and auditable exceptions. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions
  2. Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules
  3. Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs
  4. Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules. Managed patch baselines define approved versions and report host patch state.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions would address a different requirement: Backups can be deleted by compromised operators with broad production permissions. Immutable backup retention limits attacker ability to destroy recovery points.

C:

For the separate situation A suspected credential theft incident requires rapid containment without deleting all historical evidence, Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs could be useful. Credential containment limits ongoing access while audit evidence supports investigation.

D:

Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder solves the related scenario A production service depends on a third-party AMI that has not received updates for a year; golden-image pipelines automate controlled image hardening and refresh.

Question 322

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: Container images contain critical CVEs but developers deploy mutable latest tags. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Scan ECR repositories and enforce immutable versioned image promotion
  2. Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions
  3. Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules
  4. Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Scan ECR repositories and enforce immutable versioned image promotion. Scanning and image identity reduce unreviewed vulnerable deployments.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation Backups can be deleted by compromised operators with broad production permissions, Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions could be useful. Immutable backup retention limits attacker ability to destroy recovery points.

C:

Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules solves the related scenario A critical Linux fleet needs predictable security patch compliance and auditable exceptions; managed patch baselines define approved versions and report host patch state.

D:

Although Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder can be valid when A production service depends on a third-party AMI that has not received updates for a year, it targets a different technical condition. Golden-image pipelines automate controlled image hardening and refresh.

Question 323

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A production service depends on a third-party AMI that has not received updates for a year. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder
  2. Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules
  3. Scan ECR repositories and enforce immutable versioned image promotion
  4. Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder. Golden-image pipelines automate controlled image hardening and refresh.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules solves the related scenario A critical Linux fleet needs predictable security patch compliance and auditable exceptions; managed patch baselines define approved versions and report host patch state.

C:

Although Scan ECR repositories and enforce immutable versioned image promotion can be valid when Container images contain critical CVEs but developers deploy mutable latest tags, it targets a different technical condition. Scanning and image identity reduce unreviewed vulnerable deployments.

D:

Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs would address a different requirement: A suspected credential theft incident requires rapid containment without deleting all historical evidence. Credential containment limits ongoing access while audit evidence supports investigation.

Question 324

A principal solutions architect reviews an AWS application dependency, the decisive constraint is: Backups can be deleted by compromised operators with broad production permissions. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder
  2. Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs
  3. Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules
  4. Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions. Immutable backup retention limits attacker ability to destroy recovery points.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder solves the related scenario A production service depends on a third-party AMI that has not received updates for a year; golden-image pipelines automate controlled image hardening and refresh.

B:

Although Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs can be valid when A suspected credential theft incident requires rapid containment without deleting all historical evidence, it targets a different technical condition. Credential containment limits ongoing access while audit evidence supports investigation.

C:

Use Systems Manager Patch Manager with patch baselines and compliant maintenance schedules would address a different requirement: A critical Linux fleet needs predictable security patch compliance and auditable exceptions. Managed patch baselines define approved versions and report host patch state.

Question 325

A business continuity assessment identifies the following constraint, the decisive constraint is: A suspected credential theft incident requires rapid containment without deleting all historical evidence. What should the architect implement?

  1. Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions
  2. Scan ECR repositories and enforce immutable versioned image promotion
  3. Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder
  4. Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Revoke compromised role sessions where feasible, rotate secrets and preserve CloudTrail logs. Credential containment limits ongoing access while audit evidence supports investigation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Apply AWS Backup Vault Lock and segregated backup account permissions can be valid when Backups can be deleted by compromised operators with broad production permissions, it targets a different technical condition. Immutable backup retention limits attacker ability to destroy recovery points.

B:

Scan ECR repositories and enforce immutable versioned image promotion would address a different requirement: Container images contain critical CVEs but developers deploy mutable latest tags. Scanning and image identity reduce unreviewed vulnerable deployments.

C:

This alternative, Build and test a supported patched image pipeline using EC2 Image Builder, is appropriate when A production service depends on a third-party AMI that has not received updates for a year. Golden-image pipelines automate controlled image hardening and refresh.

Question 326

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A relational database's average CPU is low but client requests stall waiting on storage reads. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation
  2. Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances
  3. Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern
  4. Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation. Database wait analysis identifies I/O bottlenecks that CPU metrics alone can miss.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation A slow SQL query scans millions of rows despite narrow search predicates, Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances could be useful. Better execution plans can reduce I/O far more than adding compute capacity.

C:

Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern solves the related scenario A DynamoDB table throttles only one tenant despite ample total provisioned capacity; hot partitions impose per-partition throughput limits even with excess table capacity.

D:

Although Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency can be valid when A database experiences rising connection counts during Lambda traffic spikes, it targets a different technical condition. RDS Proxy pools application connections to reduce database connection pressure.

Question 327

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A DynamoDB table throttles only one tenant despite ample total provisioned capacity. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Add appropriate read replicas and route read-only queries away from the writer
  2. Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern
  3. Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency
  4. Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern. Hot partitions impose per-partition throughput limits even with excess table capacity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An RDS database's transactional reads grow rapidly while writes remain steady, Add appropriate read replicas and route read-only queries away from the writer could be useful. Read scaling isolates analytics and reads from transactional write load.

C:

Although Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency can be valid when A database experiences rising connection counts during Lambda traffic spikes, it targets a different technical condition. RDS Proxy pools application connections to reduce database connection pressure.

D:

Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances would address a different requirement: A slow SQL query scans millions of rows despite narrow search predicates. Better execution plans can reduce I/O far more than adding compute capacity.

Question 328

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: An RDS database's transactional reads grow rapidly while writes remain steady. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern
  2. Add appropriate read replicas and route read-only queries away from the writer
  3. Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency
  4. Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Add appropriate read replicas and route read-only queries away from the writer. The choice follows from the service boundary and operational constraint stated in the scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern solves the related scenario A DynamoDB table throttles only one tenant despite ample total provisioned capacity; hot partitions impose per-partition throughput limits even with excess table capacity.

C:

Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency would address a different requirement: A database experiences rising connection counts during Lambda traffic spikes. RDS Proxy pools application connections to reduce database connection pressure.

D:

This alternative, Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation, is appropriate when A relational database's average CPU is low but client requests stall waiting on storage reads. Database wait analysis identifies I/O bottlenecks that CPU metrics alone can miss.

Question 329

A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A database experiences rising connection counts during Lambda traffic spikes. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances
  2. Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency
  3. Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation
  4. Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency. RDS Proxy pools application connections to reduce database connection pressure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances can be valid when A slow SQL query scans millions of rows despite narrow search predicates, it targets a different technical condition. Better execution plans can reduce I/O far more than adding compute capacity.

C:

This alternative, Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation, is appropriate when A relational database's average CPU is low but client requests stall waiting on storage reads. Database wait analysis identifies I/O bottlenecks that CPU metrics alone can miss.

D:

For the separate situation A DynamoDB table throttles only one tenant despite ample total provisioned capacity, Redesign hot partition keys or spread partition traffic according to access pattern could be useful. Hot partitions impose per-partition throughput limits even with excess table capacity.

Question 330

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A slow SQL query scans millions of rows despite narrow search predicates. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances
  2. Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation
  3. Add appropriate read replicas and route read-only queries away from the writer
  4. Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Add appropriate indexes and benchmark query plans before scaling instances. Better execution plans can reduce I/O far more than adding compute capacity.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Inspect CloudWatch Database Insights wait events and I/O saturation, is appropriate when A relational database's average CPU is low but client requests stall waiting on storage reads. Database wait analysis identifies I/O bottlenecks that CPU metrics alone can miss.

C:

For the separate situation An RDS database's transactional reads grow rapidly while writes remain steady, Add appropriate read replicas and route read-only queries away from the writer could be useful. Read scaling isolates analytics and reads from transactional write load.

D:

Add RDS Proxy and control client connection concurrency solves the related scenario A database experiences rising connection counts during Lambda traffic spikes; rDS Proxy pools application connections to reduce database connection pressure.