Question 320
A team is choosing AWS services for a specific workload, the decisive constraint is: A team discovers many EC2 vulnerabilities but needs severity-based patch queues. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Aggregate Amazon Inspector findings and prioritize by exploit risk and asset criticality. Inspector identifies vulnerabilities so remediation can be based on risk rather than ad hoc scanning.
Incorrect Answers
Although Centralize Security Hub aggregation and route prioritized findings via EventBridge can be valid when Security Hub findings are scattered across accounts and remediation owners miss severe issues, it targets a different technical condition. A consolidated posture dashboard plus event routing improves remediation ownership.
Associate AWS Config noncompliance events with approved remediation automation would address a different requirement: A regulated service needs to track and remediate public S3 buckets immediately after configuration drift. Config rule state changes can trigger controlled repair when resource policy becomes unsafe.
This alternative, Investigate GuardDuty findings and isolate the affected workload through approved response, is appropriate when An EKS node begins making suspicious DNS queries to an apparent command-and-control domain. Threat-detection signals identify anomalous behavior but require triage and containment.