mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 30

Question 290

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A patch rollout must happen only during designated low-traffic hours with staged approval. What should the architect implement?

  1. Enable Systems Manager Session Manager with required IAM and instance connectivity
  2. Configure Systems Manager Maintenance Windows with targeted Patch Manager tasks
  3. Centralize relevant incidents in Systems Manager OpsCenter for operational triage
  4. Package the approved agent with Systems Manager Distributor and deploy it to the managed fleet

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Configure Systems Manager Maintenance Windows with targeted Patch Manager tasks. Maintenance Windows constrain managed operations to approved schedules.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation Engineers require instance access for troubleshooting but production security groups prohibit SSH, Enable Systems Manager Session Manager with required IAM and instance connectivity could be useful. Session Manager provides managed shell access without inbound administrative ports.

C:

Although Centralize relevant incidents in Systems Manager OpsCenter for operational triage can be valid when An operations group needs to consolidate actionable investigation items from multiple managed EC2 fleets, it targets a different technical condition. OpsCenter collects operational issues as OpsItems and supports coordinated investigation.

D:

Package the approved agent with Systems Manager Distributor and deploy it to the managed fleet would address a different requirement: Operations engineers repeatedly install the same internal monitoring agent on hundreds of managed EC2 servers. Distributor distributes versioned software packages without individual manual host installs.

Question 291

During an AWS global infrastructure design review, the decisive constraint is: A multi-AZ service claims resiliency but no test has ever interrupted an Availability Zone dependency. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Perform application-level DR simulations including identity, traffic and data checks
  2. Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO
  3. Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources
  4. Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources. Fault-injection exercises expose actual recovery behavior under induced failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Perform application-level DR simulations including identity, traffic and data checks can be valid when A disaster-recovery playbook has never validated authentication, data integrity or DNS cutover, it targets a different technical condition. End-to-end exercises reveal dependencies that infrastructure recovery alone misses.

B:

Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO would address a different requirement: A service produces noisy paging alerts from transient one-second CPU spikes. Proper evaluation windows distinguish sustained impact from harmless short fluctuations.

D:

For the separate situation An on-call team takes an hour to find owner contacts when a critical service alarms, Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service could be useful. Operational ownership shortens incident detection-to-response delay.

Question 292

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: An on-call team takes an hour to find owner contacts when a critical service alarms. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO
  2. Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources
  3. Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service
  4. Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service. Operational ownership shortens incident detection-to-response delay.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO would address a different requirement: A service produces noisy paging alerts from transient one-second CPU spikes. Proper evaluation windows distinguish sustained impact from harmless short fluctuations.

B:

This alternative, Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources, is appropriate when A multi-AZ service claims resiliency but no test has ever interrupted an Availability Zone dependency. Fault-injection exercises expose actual recovery behavior under induced failure.

D:

Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up solves the related scenario Recurrent availability incidents are closed without recording their causes or prevention actions; repeat failures are reduced only when learning translates into tested improvements.

Question 293

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: A disaster-recovery playbook has never validated authentication, data integrity or DNS cutover. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service
  2. Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up
  3. Perform application-level DR simulations including identity, traffic and data checks
  4. Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Perform application-level DR simulations including identity, traffic and data checks. End-to-end exercises reveal dependencies that infrastructure recovery alone misses.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service, is appropriate when An on-call team takes an hour to find owner contacts when a critical service alarms. Operational ownership shortens incident detection-to-response delay.

B:

For the separate situation Recurrent availability incidents are closed without recording their causes or prevention actions, Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up could be useful. Repeat failures are reduced only when learning translates into tested improvements.

D:

Although Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO can be valid when A service produces noisy paging alerts from transient one-second CPU spikes, it targets a different technical condition. Proper evaluation windows distinguish sustained impact from harmless short fluctuations.

Question 294

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: Recurrent availability incidents are closed without recording their causes or prevention actions. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up
  2. Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service
  3. Perform application-level DR simulations including identity, traffic and data checks
  4. Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up. Repeat failures are reduced only when learning translates into tested improvements.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service solves the related scenario An on-call team takes an hour to find owner contacts when a critical service alarms; operational ownership shortens incident detection-to-response delay.

C:

Although Perform application-level DR simulations including identity, traffic and data checks can be valid when A disaster-recovery playbook has never validated authentication, data integrity or DNS cutover, it targets a different technical condition. End-to-end exercises reveal dependencies that infrastructure recovery alone misses.

D:

Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources would address a different requirement: A multi-AZ service claims resiliency but no test has ever interrupted an Availability Zone dependency. Fault-injection exercises expose actual recovery behavior under induced failure.

Question 295

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: A service produces noisy paging alerts from transient one-second CPU spikes. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up
  2. Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources
  3. Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO
  4. Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Tune CloudWatch alarm evaluation periods and missing-data behavior to the actual SLO. Proper evaluation windows distinguish sustained impact from harmless short fluctuations.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Establish blameless incident reviews with tracked remediation and game-day follow-up solves the related scenario Recurrent availability incidents are closed without recording their causes or prevention actions; repeat failures are reduced only when learning translates into tested improvements.

B:

Although Conduct a controlled AWS Fault Injection Service experiment against representative resources can be valid when A multi-AZ service claims resiliency but no test has ever interrupted an Availability Zone dependency, it targets a different technical condition. Fault-injection exercises expose actual recovery behavior under induced failure.

D:

This alternative, Define alarm routing, runbooks and accountable escalation mappings for each service, is appropriate when An on-call team takes an hour to find owner contacts when a critical service alarms. Operational ownership shortens incident detection-to-response delay.

Question 296

While designing a multi-Region AWS solution, the decisive constraint is: Cloud resources drift from approved encryption settings after console changes. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Monitor AWS Service Quotas usage and CloudWatch quota metrics where supported
  2. Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance
  3. Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity
  4. Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance. Config tracks resource state and identifies policy deviation over time.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor AWS Service Quotas usage and CloudWatch quota metrics where supported would address a different requirement: A team needs advance notice that EBS or EC2 service limits will block next month's scaling. Quota visibility surfaces headroom before failed provisioning becomes an incident.

C:

For the separate situation An audit asks which engineer removed a production bucket policy at a precise timestamp, Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity could be useful. API audit logs tie configuration changes to actors and events.

D:

Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation solves the related scenario An infrastructure deployment requires automatically remediating unauthorized public security-group ingress; config-triggered remediation can restore expected security-group settings under governance.

Question 297

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: An audit asks which engineer removed a production bucket policy at a precise timestamp. What is the most defensible implementation decision?

  1. Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance
  2. Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation
  3. Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity
  4. Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity. API audit logs tie configuration changes to actors and events.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance, is appropriate when Cloud resources drift from approved encryption settings after console changes. Config tracks resource state and identifies policy deviation over time.

B:

For the separate situation An infrastructure deployment requires automatically remediating unauthorized public security-group ingress, Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation could be useful. Config-triggered remediation can restore expected security-group settings under governance.

D:

Although Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage can be valid when The security organization needs a standardized operational dashboard across different AWS accounts, it targets a different technical condition. Cross-account views simplify investigation while source accounts retain resource ownership.

Question 298

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: An infrastructure deployment requires automatically remediating unauthorized public security-group ingress. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation
  2. Monitor AWS Service Quotas usage and CloudWatch quota metrics where supported
  3. Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage
  4. Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation. Config-triggered remediation can restore expected security-group settings under governance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Monitor AWS Service Quotas usage and CloudWatch quota metrics where supported solves the related scenario A team needs advance notice that EBS or EC2 service limits will block next month's scaling; quota visibility surfaces headroom before failed provisioning becomes an incident.

C:

Although Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage can be valid when The security organization needs a standardized operational dashboard across different AWS accounts, it targets a different technical condition. Cross-account views simplify investigation while source accounts retain resource ownership.

D:

Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance would address a different requirement: Cloud resources drift from approved encryption settings after console changes. Config tracks resource state and identifies policy deviation over time.

Question 299

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: A team needs advance notice that EBS or EC2 service limits will block next month's scaling. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage
  2. Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity
  3. Monitor AWS Service Quotas usage and CloudWatch quota metrics where supported
  4. Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Monitor AWS Service Quotas usage and CloudWatch quota metrics where supported. Quota visibility surfaces headroom before failed provisioning becomes an incident.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage solves the related scenario The security organization needs a standardized operational dashboard across different AWS accounts; cross-account views simplify investigation while source accounts retain resource ownership.

B:

Although Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity can be valid when An audit asks which engineer removed a production bucket policy at a precise timestamp, it targets a different technical condition. API audit logs tie configuration changes to actors and events.

D:

This alternative, Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation, is appropriate when An infrastructure deployment requires automatically remediating unauthorized public security-group ingress. Config-triggered remediation can restore expected security-group settings under governance.

Question 300

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: The security organization needs a standardized operational dashboard across different AWS accounts. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance
  2. Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage
  3. Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity
  4. Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use cross-account CloudWatch observability with scoped source-account linkage. Cross-account views simplify investigation while source accounts retain resource ownership.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Enable AWS Config recording and rules for encryption compliance can be valid when Cloud resources drift from approved encryption settings after console changes, it targets a different technical condition. Config tracks resource state and identifies policy deviation over time.

C:

This alternative, Query CloudTrail management events and correlate role session identity, is appropriate when An audit asks which engineer removed a production bucket policy at a precise timestamp. API audit logs tie configuration changes to actors and events.

D:

For the separate situation An infrastructure deployment requires automatically remediating unauthorized public security-group ingress, Use AWS Config compliance findings with an approved Systems Manager Automation remediation could be useful. Config-triggered remediation can restore expected security-group settings under governance.