mcAfee Secure Website
23

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Bundle

Exam Code: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Exam Name AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02

Certification Provider: Amazon

Corresponding Certification: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Materials $23.86

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Success

The Latest AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Questions & Answers

    515 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Amazon Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $184.97
Bundle Price: $161.11

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    515 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Video Course

    Training Course

    192 Video Lectures

    $29.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1066 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional SAP-C02 Practice Test 1

Question 1

An architect is validating an enterprise AWS migration plan, the decisive constraint is: A corporation must route traffic among 80 VPCs without managing thousands of bilateral peering links. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables
  2. Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer
  3. Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes
  4. Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables. Transit Gateway provides a transitive hub and reduces the VPC peering mesh.

Incorrect Answers

B:

For the separate situation An existing VPC peering relationship connects two VPCs, and a third VPC needs to reach the peer through one of them, Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer could be useful. VPC peering does not support transitive routing through a peer VPC.

C:

Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes solves the related scenario An organization needs inter-Region routing between centrally connected VPC groups; transit Gateway inter-Region peering links regional transit domains without a full mesh.

D:

Although Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations can be valid when A shared-services VPC must be reached from every spoke but spokes must not reach each other, it targets a different technical condition. Segmented transit route tables allow hub-service reachability without spoke-to-spoke routing.

Question 2

In a production architecture assessment, the decisive constraint is: Two isolated business-unit VPC groups attach to one Transit Gateway but must never route between each other. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer
  2. Separate their attachments into segment-specific Transit Gateway route tables
  3. Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes
  4. Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Separate their attachments into segment-specific Transit Gateway route tables. Attachment association and propagation boundaries prevent unintended east-west reachability.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation An existing VPC peering relationship connects two VPCs, and a third VPC needs to reach the peer through one of them, Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer could be useful. VPC peering does not support transitive routing through a peer VPC.

C:

Although Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes can be valid when An organization needs inter-Region routing between centrally connected VPC groups, it targets a different technical condition. Transit Gateway inter-Region peering links regional transit domains without a full mesh.

D:

Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables would address a different requirement: A corporation must route traffic among 80 VPCs without managing thousands of bilateral peering links. Transit Gateway provides a transitive hub and reduces the VPC peering mesh.

Question 3

A cloud platform team must address a specific requirement, the decisive constraint is: An existing VPC peering relationship connects two VPCs, and a third VPC needs to reach the peer through one of them. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations
  2. Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables
  3. Separate their attachments into segment-specific Transit Gateway route tables
  4. Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer. VPC peering does not support transitive routing through a peer VPC.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations solves the related scenario A shared-services VPC must be reached from every spoke but spokes must not reach each other; segmented transit route tables allow hub-service reachability without spoke-to-spoke routing.

B:

Although Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables can be valid when A corporation must route traffic among 80 VPCs without managing thousands of bilateral peering links, it targets a different technical condition. Transit Gateway provides a transitive hub and reduces the VPC peering mesh.

C:

Separate their attachments into segment-specific Transit Gateway route tables would address a different requirement: Two isolated business-unit VPC groups attach to one Transit Gateway but must never route between each other. Attachment association and propagation boundaries prevent unintended east-west reachability.

Question 4

While investigating a cross-account AWS design, the decisive constraint is: An organization needs inter-Region routing between centrally connected VPC groups. What should the architect implement?

  1. Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables
  2. Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer
  3. Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations
  4. Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes. Transit Gateway inter-Region peering links regional transit domains without a full mesh.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Attach the VPCs to an AWS Transit Gateway with explicit route tables can be valid when A corporation must route traffic among 80 VPCs without managing thousands of bilateral peering links, it targets a different technical condition. Transit Gateway provides a transitive hub and reduces the VPC peering mesh.

B:

Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer would address a different requirement: An existing VPC peering relationship connects two VPCs, and a third VPC needs to reach the peer through one of them. VPC peering does not support transitive routing through a peer VPC.

C:

This alternative, Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations, is appropriate when A shared-services VPC must be reached from every spoke but spokes must not reach each other. Segmented transit route tables allow hub-service reachability without spoke-to-spoke routing.

Question 5

During a regulated workload modernization proposal, the decisive constraint is: A shared-services VPC must be reached from every spoke but spokes must not reach each other. Which technical choice resolves the stated issue?

  1. Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations
  2. Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer
  3. Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes
  4. Separate their attachments into segment-specific Transit Gateway route tables

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use dedicated spoke and shared-services Transit Gateway route-table associations and propagations. Segmented transit route tables allow hub-service reachability without spoke-to-spoke routing.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This alternative, Add a direct peering link or use a Transit Gateway rather than relying on the intermediate peer, is appropriate when An existing VPC peering relationship connects two VPCs, and a third VPC needs to reach the peer through one of them. VPC peering does not support transitive routing through a peer VPC.

C:

For the separate situation An organization needs inter-Region routing between centrally connected VPC groups, Peer the regional Transit Gateways and configure the peering routes could be useful. Transit Gateway inter-Region peering links regional transit domains without a full mesh.

D:

Separate their attachments into segment-specific Transit Gateway route tables solves the related scenario Two isolated business-unit VPC groups attach to one Transit Gateway but must never route between each other; attachment association and propagation boundaries prevent unintended east-west reachability.

Question 6

During an infrastructure cost and reliability assessment, the decisive constraint is: A data center needs consistent private connectivity to AWS that bypasses the public internet. Which architecture decision most directly satisfies the requirement?

  1. Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association
  2. Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations
  3. Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design
  4. Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design. Direct Connect provides a dedicated network path rather than an internet-based encrypted tunnel.

Incorrect Answers

A:

For the separate situation A central network team needs to connect many VPCs over a common Direct Connect deployment, Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association could be useful. A Direct Connect gateway supports scalable private connectivity to multiple AWS VPC networks.

B:

Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations solves the related scenario The company requires encrypted traffic over a dedicated Direct Connect circuit without an additional application tunnel; mACsec encrypts layer-2 frames on supported dedicated Direct Connect connections.

D:

Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible would address a different requirement: An existing Direct Connect path must remain available after a single physical connection failure. Physically diverse connections avoid a single circuit or colocation failure domain.

Question 7

An engineering organization has identified this operational requirement, the decisive constraint is: An existing Direct Connect path must remain available after a single physical connection failure. What is the most appropriate design under these constraints?

  1. Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible
  2. Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations
  3. Configure an AWS Site-to-Site VPN as a secondary hybrid path with BGP route preference
  4. Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible. Physically diverse connections avoid a single circuit or colocation failure domain.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Although Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations can be valid when The company requires encrypted traffic over a dedicated Direct Connect circuit without an additional application tunnel, it targets a different technical condition. MACsec encrypts layer-2 frames on supported dedicated Direct Connect connections.

C:

Configure an AWS Site-to-Site VPN as a secondary hybrid path with BGP route preference would address a different requirement: The dedicated hybrid connection is healthy but a regional routing disruption requires automatic backup. The VPN offers an alternate encrypted path if the preferred Direct Connect route is unavailable.

D:

This alternative, Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association, is appropriate when A central network team needs to connect many VPCs over a common Direct Connect deployment. A Direct Connect gateway supports scalable private connectivity to multiple AWS VPC networks.

Question 8

A production readiness review reports the following problem, the decisive constraint is: The dedicated hybrid connection is healthy but a regional routing disruption requires automatic backup. Which recommendation best addresses the actual bottleneck?

  1. Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design
  2. Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible
  3. Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association
  4. Configure an AWS Site-to-Site VPN as a secondary hybrid path with BGP route preference

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure an AWS Site-to-Site VPN as a secondary hybrid path with BGP route preference. The VPN offers an alternate encrypted path if the preferred Direct Connect route is unavailable.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Although Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design can be valid when A data center needs consistent private connectivity to AWS that bypasses the public internet, it targets a different technical condition. Direct Connect provides a dedicated network path rather than an internet-based encrypted tunnel.

B:

Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible would address a different requirement: An existing Direct Connect path must remain available after a single physical connection failure. Physically diverse connections avoid a single circuit or colocation failure domain.

C:

This alternative, Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association, is appropriate when A central network team needs to connect many VPCs over a common Direct Connect deployment. A Direct Connect gateway supports scalable private connectivity to multiple AWS VPC networks.

Question 9

An AWS Well-Architected design review identifies a condition, the decisive constraint is: A central network team needs to connect many VPCs over a common Direct Connect deployment. Which approach meets the stated objective with the least unnecessary complexity?

  1. Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible
  2. Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association
  3. Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations
  4. Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association. A Direct Connect gateway supports scalable private connectivity to multiple AWS VPC networks.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Deploy separate Direct Connect connections at independent locations where feasible would address a different requirement: An existing Direct Connect path must remain available after a single physical connection failure. Physically diverse connections avoid a single circuit or colocation failure domain.

C:

For the separate situation The company requires encrypted traffic over a dedicated Direct Connect circuit without an additional application tunnel, Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations could be useful. MACsec encrypts layer-2 frames on supported dedicated Direct Connect connections.

D:

Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design solves the related scenario A data center needs consistent private connectivity to AWS that bypasses the public internet; direct Connect provides a dedicated network path rather than an internet-based encrypted tunnel.

Question 10

During an architecture migration cutover planning meeting, the decisive constraint is: The company requires encrypted traffic over a dedicated Direct Connect circuit without an additional application tunnel. What should the architect implement?

  1. Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association
  2. Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations
  3. Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design
  4. Configure an AWS Site-to-Site VPN as a secondary hybrid path with BGP route preference

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Evaluate Direct Connect MACsec on supported dedicated ports and locations. MACsec encrypts layer-2 frames on supported dedicated Direct Connect connections.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This alternative, Use a Direct Connect gateway with an appropriate Transit Gateway association, is appropriate when A central network team needs to connect many VPCs over a common Direct Connect deployment. A Direct Connect gateway supports scalable private connectivity to multiple AWS VPC networks.

C:

Provision an AWS Direct Connect connection and private virtual interface to the VPC transit design solves the related scenario A data center needs consistent private connectivity to AWS that bypasses the public internet; direct Connect provides a dedicated network path rather than an internet-based encrypted tunnel.

D:

Although Configure an AWS Site-to-Site VPN as a secondary hybrid path with BGP route preference can be valid when The dedicated hybrid connection is healthy but a regional routing disruption requires automatic backup, it targets a different technical condition. The VPN offers an alternate encrypted path if the preferred Direct Connect route is unavailable.