Question 1
A company hardens root and workforce sign-in across its AWS accounts. A recent validation shows that a root user still signs in with only a password. What should the solution architect recommend?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The recommended action is: Enable root-user MFA and protect recovery factors. The evidence is a root user still signs in with only a password. The root identity has broad authority and requires a second factor. Its technical effect matches the identified failure.
Incorrect Answers
For the alternative failure a contractor keeps access after leaving the corporate directory, the control Remove the contractor from the identity provider and revoke affected sessions where needed is relevant: central identity lifecycle reduces lingering federated access. Here the evidence instead is a root user still signs in with only a password. The selected technical mechanism is Enable root-user MFA and protect recovery factors: the root identity has broad authority and requires a second factor.
Replace shared IAM users with workforce federation through IAM Identity Center solves a different operational problem where teams still use a shared IAM user and password for AWS console administration. Federation provides attributable console identities without sharing a single IAM user password. It does not directly address a root user still signs in with only a password. The case calls for Enable root-user MFA and protect recovery factors, since the root identity has broad authority and requires a second factor.
The competing option Use individual federated identities and correlate CloudTrail principal identities would be useful when engineers cannot identify which person made an administrative change. CloudTrail records the assumed identity behind API activity. The present issue is a root user still signs in with only a password; it is more directly addressed by Enable root-user MFA and protect recovery factors. The root identity has broad authority and requires a second factor.