Question 580
During a regulated deployment assessment at a healthcare imaging provider, engineers report the following issue: An engineer wants diagnostic evidence for an accelerator exhibiting repeated faults. The affected work supports clinical imaging and model-assisted workflows; patient data constraints and reliable model performance are important. Choose TWO: one corrective approach and one result demonstrating it works. (Select TWO.)
Explanation
Correct Answers
Correct corrective action. Use NVIDIA Data Center GPU Manager to collect supported accelerator telemetry, health and diagnostic information across datacenter GPU nodes. This fits the specific reported issue: An engineer wants diagnostic evidence for an accelerator exhibiting repeated faults. The corresponding failure being reduced is: Host uptime or generic CPU monitoring alone can miss GPU-specific failures, throttling and compute or memory problems.
Correct independent evidence. A deliberately observed GPU condition appears in DCGM telemetry with node and device identity and leads to an actionable diagnostic record. This verifies the corrective approach for the affected clinical imaging and model-assisted workflows instead of treating an architecture diagram alone as success.
Incorrect Answers
Not the most direct the action-and-evidence pair for these facts. Compare supported vGPU or time-sliced sharing, passthrough and MIG-backed virtualization according to VM isolation, licensing, performance and hardware support requirements. This choice concerns virtual gpus and gpu sharing approaches and may be valid in another design. But this case reports 'An engineer wants diagnostic evidence for an accelerator exhibiting repeated faults', which calls for reasoning about nvidia dcgm gpu fleet diagnostics and health. The targeted response is: Use NVIDIA Data Center GPU Manager to collect supported accelerator telemetry, health and diagnostic information across datacenter GPU nodes.
Not the most direct the action-and-evidence pair for these facts. Use a secured baseboard management controller and out-of-band path to inspect system sensors, power and remote console status independently of the host operating system. This choice concerns bmc and out-of-band server health administration and may be valid in another design. But this case reports 'An engineer wants diagnostic evidence for an accelerator exhibiting repeated faults', which calls for reasoning about nvidia dcgm gpu fleet diagnostics and health. The targeted response is: Use NVIDIA Data Center GPU Manager to collect supported accelerator telemetry, health and diagnostic information across datacenter GPU nodes.
Not the most direct the action-and-evidence pair for these facts. Several representative users submit jobs and the scheduler allocates only authorized GPU resources under the published priority and quota policy. This choice concerns slurm batch queues fair-share and reservations and may be valid in another design. But this case reports 'An engineer wants diagnostic evidence for an accelerator exhibiting repeated faults', which calls for reasoning about nvidia dcgm gpu fleet diagnostics and health. The targeted response is: Use NVIDIA Data Center GPU Manager to collect supported accelerator telemetry, health and diagnostic information across datacenter GPU nodes.