Question 290
During a security and capacity review at a financial analytics firm, engineers report the following issue: The dataset preparation stage cannot keep the accelerators fed during long runs. The affected work supports risk scoring and historical-data models; traceable controls and predictable throughput are required. Which TWO responses form the best remediation-and-evidence pair? (Select TWO.)
Explanation
Correct Answers
Correct corrective action. Size accelerator throughput alongside CPU preprocessing, storage read bandwidth and networking so the training system can sustain data delivery and communication. This fits the specific reported issue: The dataset preparation stage cannot keep the accelerators fed during long runs. The corresponding failure being reduced is: Expensive GPUs can idle waiting for data or parameter exchange when the surrounding system is inadequately provisioned.
Correct independent evidence. GPU duty-cycle telemetry and input pipeline measurements show the intended sustained utilization under a representative training job. This verifies the corrective approach for the affected risk scoring and historical-data models instead of treating an architecture diagram alone as success.
Incorrect Answers
Not the most direct the action-and-evidence pair for these facts. A controlled facility-failure review traces each critical path and confirms an acceptable alternate path or documented recovery procedure. This choice concerns redundant facility services for ai availability and may be valid in another design. But this case reports 'The dataset preparation stage cannot keep the accelerators fed during long runs', which calls for reasoning about training system compute and data feed balance. The targeted response is: Size accelerator throughput alongside CPU preprocessing, storage read bandwidth and networking so the training system can sustain data delivery and communication.
Not the most direct the action-and-evidence pair for these facts. Associate a BlueField DPU with offloading selected networking, storage and security infrastructure work from host CPUs while meeting supported deployment constraints. This choice concerns bluefield dpu infrastructure offload and may be valid in another design. But this case reports 'The dataset preparation stage cannot keep the accelerators fed during long runs', which calls for reasoning about training system compute and data feed balance. The targeted response is: Size accelerator throughput alongside CPU preprocessing, storage read bandwidth and networking so the training system can sustain data delivery and communication.
Not the most direct the action-and-evidence pair for these facts. Estimate model weights, gradients, optimizer state, activations and batch size against usable GPU memory before selecting training hardware. This choice concerns gpu memory capacity for model training and may be valid in another design. But this case reports 'The dataset preparation stage cannot keep the accelerators fed during long runs', which calls for reasoning about training system compute and data feed balance. The targeted response is: Size accelerator throughput alongside CPU preprocessing, storage read bandwidth and networking so the training system can sustain data delivery and communication.