Microsoft PL-300 Bundle

Expired or incorrect credentials prevent refreshing imported source data. The deciding difference is “its database password rotates” versus “Check dashboard tile cache refresh separately from DirectQuery”.

Scheduled refresh defines when service data ingestion should run. Its application is “00 with an import source”, not the need “Check dashboard tile cache refresh separately from DirectQuery”.

A gateway enables controlled access to private network sources. That is a different operating condition from “Check dashboard tile cache refresh separately from DirectQuery”: “the cloud service cannot reach directly”.

Schema drift can invalidate applied source steps during refresh. It serves “a source changed column names overnight”, not “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs”.

Gateway availability alone does not guarantee correct semantic-model mapping. The present requirement is “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs”; “a dataset cannot map its configured data source” is a distinct situation.

Direct Lake has different metadata and data access update behavior. That matters for “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics” rather than the condition “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs”.

Repeated failures can disable schedules until configuration is corrected. That matters for “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs” rather than the condition “successfully but numbers still show yesterday's source data”.

Gateway availability alone does not guarantee correct semantic-model mapping. This solves “a dataset cannot map its configured data source”; the stated issue is “successfully but numbers still show yesterday's source data”.

Direct Lake has different metadata and data access update behavior. The deciding difference is “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics” versus “successfully but numbers still show yesterday's source data”.

A successful refresh can ingest stale upstream records. The deciding difference is “successfully but numbers still show yesterday's source data” versus “a source changed column names overnight”.

Direct Lake has different metadata and data access update behavior. That is a different operating condition from “a source changed column names overnight”: “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics”.

Repeated failures can disable schedules until configuration is corrected. It serves “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs”, not “a source changed column names overnight”.

Schema drift can invalidate applied source steps during refresh. It serves “a source changed column names overnight”, not “a dataset cannot map its configured data source”.

Repeated failures can disable schedules until configuration is corrected. That matters for “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs” rather than the condition “a dataset cannot map its configured data source”.

Direct Lake has different metadata and data access update behavior. The boundary it addresses is “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics”, while this case concerns “a dataset cannot map its configured data source”.

Gateway availability alone does not guarantee correct semantic-model mapping. The boundary it addresses is “a dataset cannot map its configured data source”, while this case concerns “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics”.

A successful refresh can ingest stale upstream records. This solves “successfully but numbers still show yesterday's source data”; the stated issue is “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics”.

Repeated failures can disable schedules until configuration is corrected. Its application is “failed repeatedly and the service disabled future runs”, not the need “Direct Lake use exactly the same refresh mechanics”.

Build authorizes report creation from a model, not editing its definition. Its application is “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission”, not the need “create a new report from the semantic model”.

Direct sharing can distribute an individual report to designated readers. That is a different operating condition from “create a new report from the semantic model”: “approved group instead of the whole app catalog”.

Apps are designed for organized broad report consumption. It serves “distributes many related reports to thousands of employees”, not “create a new report from the semantic model”.

Direct sharing can distribute an individual report to designated readers. The present requirement is “semantic model but not edit its data definition”; “approved group instead of the whole app catalog” is a distinct situation.

Build authorizes report creation from a model, not editing its definition. That matters for “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission” rather than the condition “semantic model but not edit its data definition”.

Read access supports consumption without enabling model-based authoring. This solves “create a new report from the semantic model”; the stated issue is “semantic model but not edit its data definition”.

Build allows creation of dependent reports without assigning workspace contributor rights. This solves “semantic model but not edit its data definition”; the stated issue is “approved group instead of the whole app catalog”.

Build authorizes report creation from a model, not editing its definition. The deciding difference is “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission” versus “approved group instead of the whole app catalog”.

Read access supports consumption without enabling model-based authoring. Its application is “create a new report from the semantic model”, not the need “approved group instead of the whole app catalog”.

Build authorizes report creation from a model, not editing its definition. It serves “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission”, not “distributes many related reports to thousands of employees”.

Direct sharing can distribute an individual report to designated readers. The present requirement is “distributes many related reports to thousands of employees”; “approved group instead of the whole app catalog” is a distinct situation.

Build allows creation of dependent reports without assigning workspace contributor rights. That matters for “semantic model but not edit its data definition” rather than the condition “distributes many related reports to thousands of employees”.

Build allows creation of dependent reports without assigning workspace contributor rights. The boundary it addresses is “semantic model but not edit its data definition”, while this case concerns “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission”.

Direct sharing can distribute an individual report to designated readers. This solves “approved group instead of the whole app catalog”; the stated issue is “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission”.

Apps are designed for organized broad report consumption. The deciding difference is “distributes many related reports to thousands of employees” versus “model measures, but someone grants only Build permission”.