Question 150
A desktop service validation exercise records: A new workspace is created but the wrong application group is registered to it. Which observation MOST DIRECTLY verifies the appropriate corrective approach succeeded?
Explanation
Correct Answer
The test concerns: A new workspace is created but the wrong application group is registered to it. Decisive evidence is: A pilot user assigned to the application group can subscribe to the workspace and launch the intended resource. This confirms the intended correction (Create the intended AVD host pool, application group, workspace and session hosts in an approved subscription and link resources for discovery.) and tests the failure risk: Creating a session host without an accessible application group and registered workspace will not publish a usable desktop feed. Other healthy Azure resources or unrelated service telemetry would not, by themselves, establish success for this case.
Incorrect Answers
This option relates to Host agent health and troubleshooting registration under AZ-140 objective group 1.4. It addresses a different failure risk: A running virtual machine is not necessarily a healthy AVD session host when the agent, registration or domain trust fails. But the observed requirement is: A new workspace is created but the wrong application group is registered to it. For the targeted topic (Portal host pool and workspace provisioning), the directly relevant verification is: A pilot user assigned to the application group can subscribe to the workspace and launch the intended resource. That other measure may be useful in a separate environment, but does not by itself establish the specific requested outcome. An independent qualified Azure Virtual Desktop expert must adjudicate any plausible overlapping alternatives before release.
This option relates to Host pool drain mode and safe maintenance under AZ-140 objective group 1.4. It addresses a different failure risk: Patching an active pooled host without draining can interrupt current users and trigger new sessions during repair. But the observed requirement is: A new workspace is created but the wrong application group is registered to it. For the targeted topic (Portal host pool and workspace provisioning), the directly relevant verification is: A pilot user assigned to the application group can subscribe to the workspace and launch the intended resource. That other measure may be useful in a separate environment, but does not by itself establish the specific requested outcome. An independent qualified Azure Virtual Desktop expert must adjudicate any plausible overlapping alternatives before release.
This option relates to Session host registration token and agent lifecycle under AZ-140 objective group 1.4. It addresses a different failure risk: An expired token or broken registration agent can leave a powered-on VM unavailable for AVD connections. But the observed requirement is: A new workspace is created but the wrong application group is registered to it. For the targeted topic (Portal host pool and workspace provisioning), the directly relevant verification is: A pilot user assigned to the application group can subscribe to the workspace and launch the intended resource. That other measure may be useful in a separate environment, but does not by itself establish the specific requested outcome. An independent qualified Azure Virtual Desktop expert must adjudicate any plausible overlapping alternatives before release.