mcAfee Secure Website
23

Isaca CISA Bundle

Exam Code: CISA

Exam Name Certified Information Systems Auditor

Certification Provider: Isaca

Corresponding Certification: CISA

CISA Training Materials $44.99
Pass4sure Q&A Sample #1 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #2 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #3 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #4 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #5 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #6 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #7 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #8 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #9 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #10

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for CISA Exam Success

The Latest CISA Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    CISA Questions & Answers

    1097 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    CISA Video Course

    CISA Training Course

    74 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    CISA Study Guide

    1141 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Isaca Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    1097 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    CISA Video Course

    Training Course

    74 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1141 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Isaca CISA Practice Test 4

Question 30

During a post-incident audit at a retail marketplace, the IS auditor learns that a financial audit sample is used to conclude that all privacy controls are effective. The affected operation supports customer checkout and order fulfillment. Customer transactions and market trust depend on effective control. Which evidence would BEST support a conclusion that the exposure has been addressed?

  1. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided.
  2. Dated source-system exports, reconciliations and retained workpapers corroborate the control's operation during the audit period.
  3. A risk-to-control map and observed test demonstrate the intended preventive gate, timely detection and accountable correction operate together.
  4. Approved scope and change logs show assigned owners, realistic milestones and completed evidence gates for material objectives.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that a financial audit sample is used to conclude that all privacy controls are effective. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

Question 31

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a penetration test finding is described as proof of end-to-end governance effectiveness. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. Which consequence would MOST directly follow if this weakness remains unresolved?

  1. Faulty extraction logic or incomplete data can hide exceptions while giving false confidence in audit analytics.
  2. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained.
  3. Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported.
  4. Audit resources may fail to address the systems and exposures most material to organizational objectives.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained. The described exception is: a penetration test finding is described as proof of end-to-end governance effectiveness. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of freight tracking and fleet operations, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Faulty extraction logic or incomplete data can hide exceptions while giving false confidence in audit analytics. That describes Audit data analytics completeness and exceptions, not evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported. The definition of evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is not established by this choice.

D:

Audit resources may fail to address the systems and exposures most material to organizational objectives. This category is separate from evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 32

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a penetration test finding is described as proof of end-to-end governance effectiveness. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. Which audit procedure would provide the MOST DIRECT evidence about this control?

  1. Reconcile input totals, inspect extraction and transformation logic, test boundary cases and independently reproduce selected exceptions.
  2. Compare the approved engagement letter, criteria, exclusions, procedures and deliverable wording to identify any overstatement of assurance.
  3. Reconcile the audit universe with risk assessments, incidents, regulatory changes and business impact, then evaluate documented prioritization.
  4. Verify the source population against independent totals, select a risk-appropriate sample and document the sampling method and deviations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Compare the approved engagement letter, criteria, exclusions, procedures and deliverable wording to identify any overstatement of assurance. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that a penetration test finding is described as proof of end-to-end governance effectiveness. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

C:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 33

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a penetration test finding is described as proof of end-to-end governance effectiveness. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. Which follow-up result would BEST substantiate that the remediation operates effectively?

  1. An approved risk-ranked audit plan links coverage and resource allocation to the updated risk register and material business services.
  2. Approved scope and change logs show assigned owners, realistic milestones and completed evidence gates for material objectives.
  3. A validated data lineage and repeatable queries yield matching totals and demonstrably detect seeded or known anomalies.
  4. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that a penetration test finding is described as proof of end-to-end governance effectiveness. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The definition of evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is not established by this choice.

B:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. This category is separate from evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That describes Audit data analytics completeness and exceptions, not evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 34

During a follow-up assurance engagement at a telecommunications provider, the IS auditor learns that a negotiated procedures review is advertised as conclusive assurance over all IT controls. The affected operation supports customer provisioning and billing. Service availability and accurate customer billing depend on the process. Which weakness is MOST material to the control objective in this situation?

  1. Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported.
  2. Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood.
  3. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained.
  4. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained. The described exception is: a negotiated procedures review is advertised as conclusive assurance over all IT controls. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of customer provisioning and billing, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations. The evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion prerequisite remains unaddressed.

Question 35

During a follow-up assurance engagement at a telecommunications provider, the IS auditor learns that a negotiated procedures review is advertised as conclusive assurance over all IT controls. The affected operation supports customer provisioning and billing. Service availability and accurate customer billing depend on the process. Which audit procedure would MOST directly validate the suspected control gap?

  1. Verify the source population against independent totals, select a risk-appropriate sample and document the sampling method and deviations.
  2. Walk through the process and classify each control by timing and action; test whether it prevents, detects or corrects the stated event.
  3. Compare the approved engagement letter, criteria, exclusions, procedures and deliverable wording to identify any overstatement of assurance.
  4. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Compare the approved engagement letter, criteria, exclusions, procedures and deliverable wording to identify any overstatement of assurance. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that a negotiated procedures review is advertised as conclusive assurance over all IT controls. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 36

During a follow-up assurance engagement at a telecommunications provider, the IS auditor learns that a negotiated procedures review is advertised as conclusive assurance over all IT controls. The affected operation supports customer provisioning and billing. Service availability and accurate customer billing depend on the process. What would an auditor MOST want to see before accepting the issue as remediated?

  1. A risk-to-control map and observed test demonstrate the intended preventive gate, timely detection and accountable correction operate together.
  2. A finalized report presents evidenced findings, material limitations, accountable actions and timely escalation of unresolved high risks.
  3. Approved scope and change logs show assigned owners, realistic milestones and completed evidence gates for material objectives.
  4. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that a negotiated procedures review is advertised as conclusive assurance over all IT controls. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion prerequisite remains unaddressed.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 37

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that the annual audit plan allocates equal hours to low-risk kiosks and the payment platform. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. What is the MOST defensible risk conclusion from the observed condition?

  1. Faulty extraction logic or incomplete data can hide exceptions while giving false confidence in audit analytics.
  2. Audit resources may fail to address the systems and exposures most material to organizational objectives.
  3. Biased or incomplete samples can produce unsupported conclusions about how a control operates across the actual population.
  4. Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Audit resources may fail to address the systems and exposures most material to organizational objectives. The described exception is: the annual audit plan allocates equal hours to low-risk kiosks and the payment platform. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of patient-care scheduling and claims processing, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Faulty extraction logic or incomplete data can hide exceptions while giving false confidence in audit analytics. That protection can exist while evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is still missing.

C:

Biased or incomplete samples can produce unsupported conclusions about how a control operates across the actual population. It does not retain the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion control over time.

D:

Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood. Recurrence here depends on evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this safeguard.

Question 38

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that the annual audit plan allocates equal hours to low-risk kiosks and the payment platform. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. Which fieldwork step should the auditor prioritize to test the issue?

  1. Reconcile the audit universe with risk assessments, incidents, regulatory changes and business impact, then evaluate documented prioritization.
  2. Corroborate management assertions with independently obtained, time-bounded system records and test source integrity and completeness.
  3. Reconcile input totals, inspect extraction and transformation logic, test boundary cases and independently reproduce selected exceptions.
  4. Walk through the process and classify each control by timing and action; test whether it prevents, detects or corrects the stated event.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. Reconcile the audit universe with risk assessments, incidents, regulatory changes and business impact, then evaluate documented prioritization. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that the annual audit plan allocates equal hours to low-risk kiosks and the payment platform. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It does not retain the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion control over time.

C:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. Recurrence here depends on evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this safeguard.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That protection can exist while evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is still missing.

Question 39

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that the annual audit plan allocates equal hours to low-risk kiosks and the payment platform. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. Which observed evidence is MOST persuasive for a controlled audit follow-up?

  1. A risk-to-control map and observed test demonstrate the intended preventive gate, timely detection and accountable correction operate together.
  2. A validated data lineage and repeatable queries yield matching totals and demonstrably detect seeded or known anomalies.
  3. An approved risk-ranked audit plan links coverage and resource allocation to the updated risk register and material business services.
  4. A reconciled population, reproducible selections and evaluated deviations support a conclusion limited to the population actually tested.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. An approved risk-ranked audit plan links coverage and resource allocation to the updated risk register and material business services. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that the annual audit plan allocates equal hours to low-risk kiosks and the payment platform. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

Question 40

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that the plan omits a newly acquired high-risk cloud service from its audit universe. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. Which risk statement is BEST supported by the recorded exception?

  1. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations.
  2. Biased or incomplete samples can produce unsupported conclusions about how a control operates across the actual population.
  3. Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported.
  4. Audit resources may fail to address the systems and exposures most material to organizational objectives.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. Audit resources may fail to address the systems and exposures most material to organizational objectives. The described exception is: the plan omits a newly acquired high-risk cloud service from its audit universe. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of merchant settlement and reconciliation, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations. Recurrence here depends on evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this safeguard.

B:

Biased or incomplete samples can produce unsupported conclusions about how a control operates across the actual population. That protection can exist while evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is still missing.

C:

Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported. It protects a different risk than the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion requirement.