mcAfee Secure Website
23

Isaca CISA Bundle

Exam Code: CISA

Exam Name Certified Information Systems Auditor

Certification Provider: Isaca

Corresponding Certification: CISA

CISA Training Materials $44.99
Pass4sure Q&A Sample #1 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #2 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #3 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #4 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #5 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #6 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #7 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #8 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #9 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #10

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for CISA Exam Success

The Latest CISA Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    CISA Questions & Answers

    1097 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    CISA Video Course

    CISA Training Course

    74 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    CISA Study Guide

    1141 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Isaca Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    1097 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    CISA Video Course

    Training Course

    74 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1141 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Isaca CISA Practice Test 31

Question 300

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that the operations dashboard counts tickets closed while critical transaction failures rise. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. What outcome would provide the STRONGEST evidence that the identified gap is resolved?

  1. Approved design reviews and exception tracking show new systems align with target architecture or have justified remediable deviations.
  2. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone.
  3. A current obligation register and sampled control records show required retention, reporting and location requirements are fulfilled.
  4. Documented business sponsorship, explicit decision authority and governance reporting link IT choices to approved objectives and risk appetite.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that the operations dashboard counts tickets closed while critical transaction failures rise. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 301

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that management reports average latency despite repeated severe tail-latency breaches. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. What control exposure MOST directly explains why this observation is significant?

  1. Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives.
  2. Quality claims may not reflect end-to-end requirements when assurance lacks independence, feedback and traceable controls.
  3. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions.
  4. IT exposures may fall outside risk appetite because ownership, escalation and residual risk assessment are ineffective.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions. The described exception is: management reports average latency despite repeated severe tail-latency breaches. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of merchant settlement and reconciliation, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives. The evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion prerequisite remains unaddressed.

B:

Quality claims may not reflect end-to-end requirements when assurance lacks independence, feedback and traceable controls. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

IT exposures may fall outside risk appetite because ownership, escalation and residual risk assessment are ineffective. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 302

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that management reports average latency despite repeated severe tail-latency breaches. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. Which evidence-gathering approach is MOST aligned with the recorded exposure?

  1. Trace a sample of enterprise requirements from policy through standards, procedures, communication and exception approval.
  2. Examine quality plans, acceptance tests, defect trends, independent reviews and corrective action effectiveness.
  3. Trace measures to service objectives, definitions, source data, thresholds and escalation actions; independently recalculate samples.
  4. Trace technology risk scenarios through impact assessment, owner assignment, controls, acceptance authority and board reporting.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Trace measures to service objectives, definitions, source data, thresholds and escalation actions; independently recalculate samples. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that management reports average latency despite repeated severe tail-latency breaches. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

Question 303

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that management reports average latency despite repeated severe tail-latency breaches. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. Which evidence would BEST support a conclusion that the exposure has been addressed?

  1. Named risk owners, documented residual assessments and appropriately approved responses tie material exposures to the enterprise risk framework.
  2. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone.
  3. Traceable acceptance evidence and declining repeat defects show quality objectives are met and corrective actions are sustained.
  4. Documented business sponsorship, explicit decision authority and governance reporting link IT choices to approved objectives and risk appetite.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that management reports average latency despite repeated severe tail-latency breaches. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

Question 304

During a regulatory readiness review at a municipal government, the IS auditor learns that the board receives zero cyber-risk indicators despite unresolved critical vulnerabilities. The affected operation supports citizen service accounts and public records. Public accountability and essential service access are affected. Which consequence would MOST directly follow if this weakness remains unresolved?

  1. Personal information may be used or retained without appropriate purpose, transparency, authority and enforceable safeguards.
  2. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions.
  3. Unidentified obligations or ambiguous accountability may create compliance exposure despite technically functional systems.
  4. Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions. The described exception is: the board receives zero cyber-risk indicators despite unresolved critical vulnerabilities. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of citizen service accounts and public records, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Personal information may be used or retained without appropriate purpose, transparency, authority and enforceable safeguards. Recurrence here depends on evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this safeguard.

C:

Unidentified obligations or ambiguous accountability may create compliance exposure despite technically functional systems. It protects a different risk than the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion requirement.

D:

Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives. It does not retain the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion control over time.

Question 305

During a regulatory readiness review at a municipal government, the IS auditor learns that the board receives zero cyber-risk indicators despite unresolved critical vulnerabilities. The affected operation supports citizen service accounts and public records. Public accountability and essential service access are affected. Which audit procedure would provide the MOST DIRECT evidence about this control?

  1. Trace a processing purpose from data inventory and notices through lawful basis, retention, processor flows and privacy impact assessment.
  2. Trace a sample of enterprise requirements from policy through standards, procedures, communication and exception approval.
  3. Trace measures to service objectives, definitions, source data, thresholds and escalation actions; independently recalculate samples.
  4. Map applicable laws and contracts to accountable owners, controls, jurisdictional flows and periodic compliance assessment evidence.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Trace measures to service objectives, definitions, source data, thresholds and escalation actions; independently recalculate samples. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that the board receives zero cyber-risk indicators despite unresolved critical vulnerabilities. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

Question 306

During a regulatory readiness review at a municipal government, the IS auditor learns that the board receives zero cyber-risk indicators despite unresolved critical vulnerabilities. The affected operation supports citizen service accounts and public records. Public accountability and essential service access are affected. Which follow-up result would BEST substantiate that the remediation operates effectively?

  1. Approved purpose inventories and sampled rights requests, deletion actions and processor reviews demonstrate privacy requirements operate end to end.
  2. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone.
  3. Documented business sponsorship, explicit decision authority and governance reporting link IT choices to approved objectives and risk appetite.
  4. A current obligation register and sampled control records show required retention, reporting and location requirements are fulfilled.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that the board receives zero cyber-risk indicators despite unresolved critical vulnerabilities. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It protects a different risk than the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion requirement.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. Recurrence here depends on evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this safeguard.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That protection can exist while evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is still missing.

Question 307

During a post-incident audit at a retail marketplace, the IS auditor learns that service metrics lack documented thresholds or data owners. The affected operation supports customer checkout and order fulfillment. Customer transactions and market trust depend on effective control. Which weakness is MOST material to the control objective in this situation?

  1. Quality claims may not reflect end-to-end requirements when assurance lacks independence, feedback and traceable controls.
  2. Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives.
  3. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions.
  4. Uncontrolled design divergence can generate integration, security, technical debt and strategic alignment risks.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions. The described exception is: service metrics lack documented thresholds or data owners. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of customer checkout and order fulfillment, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Quality claims may not reflect end-to-end requirements when assurance lacks independence, feedback and traceable controls. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Uncontrolled design divergence can generate integration, security, technical debt and strategic alignment risks. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 308

During a post-incident audit at a retail marketplace, the IS auditor learns that service metrics lack documented thresholds or data owners. The affected operation supports customer checkout and order fulfillment. Customer transactions and market trust depend on effective control. Which audit procedure would MOST directly validate the suspected control gap?

  1. Review architecture standards and exception decisions against the solution portfolio, integration map and target-state road map.
  2. Examine quality plans, acceptance tests, defect trends, independent reviews and corrective action effectiveness.
  3. Trace measures to service objectives, definitions, source data, thresholds and escalation actions; independently recalculate samples.
  4. Trace a sample of enterprise requirements from policy through standards, procedures, communication and exception approval.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Trace measures to service objectives, definitions, source data, thresholds and escalation actions; independently recalculate samples. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that service metrics lack documented thresholds or data owners. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion prerequisite remains unaddressed.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 309

During a post-incident audit at a retail marketplace, the IS auditor learns that service metrics lack documented thresholds or data owners. The affected operation supports customer checkout and order fulfillment. Customer transactions and market trust depend on effective control. What would an auditor MOST want to see before accepting the issue as remediated?

  1. Documented business sponsorship, explicit decision authority and governance reporting link IT choices to approved objectives and risk appetite.
  2. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone.
  3. Traceable acceptance evidence and declining repeat defects show quality objectives are met and corrective actions are sustained.
  4. Approved design reviews and exception tracking show new systems align with target architecture or have justified remediable deviations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Validated KPIs and KRIs show business outcomes, breached thresholds and accountable corrective decisions, not activity counts alone. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that service metrics lack documented thresholds or data owners. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion prerequisite remains unaddressed.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 310

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a green monthly score masks a sustained decline in successful backup restores. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. What is the MOST defensible risk conclusion from the observed condition?

  1. Unidentified obligations or ambiguous accountability may create compliance exposure despite technically functional systems.
  2. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions.
  3. IT exposures may fall outside risk appetite because ownership, escalation and residual risk assessment are ineffective.
  4. Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Misleading or poorly governed measures can conceal material service risk and distort decisions. The described exception is: a green monthly score masks a sustained decline in successful backup restores. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of freight tracking and fleet operations, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unidentified obligations or ambiguous accountability may create compliance exposure despite technically functional systems. It protects a different risk than the evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion requirement.

C:

IT exposures may fall outside risk appetite because ownership, escalation and residual risk assessment are ineffective. Recurrence here depends on evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this safeguard.

D:

Weak governance can misalign technology decisions, accountability and risk ownership with enterprise objectives. That protection can exist while evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is still missing.