mcAfee Secure Website
23

Isaca CISA Bundle

Exam Code: CISA

Exam Name Certified Information Systems Auditor

Certification Provider: Isaca

Corresponding Certification: CISA

CISA Training Materials $44.99
Pass4sure Q&A Sample #1 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #2 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #3 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #4 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #5 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #6 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #7 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #8 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #9 Pass4sure Q&A Sample #10

Reliable & Actual Study Materials for CISA Exam Success

The Latest CISA Exam Questions as Experienced in the Actual Test!

  • 24
    Questions & Answers

    CISA Questions & Answers

    1097 Questions & Answers

    Includes questions types found on actual exam such as drag and drop, simulation, type in, and fill in the blank.

  • 25
    CISA Video Course

    CISA Training Course

    74 Video Lectures

    Based on Real Life Scenarios which you will encounter in exam and learn by working with real equipment.

  • exam =30
    Study Guide

    CISA Study Guide

    1141 PDF Pages

    Study Guide developed by industry experts who have written exams in the past. They are technology-specific IT certification researchers with at least a decade of experience at Fortune 500 companies.

exam =32

Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA) Practice Tests

Guarantee

Satisfaction Guaranteed

Pass4sure has a remarkable Isaca Candidate Success record. We're confident of our products and provide no hassle product exchange. That's how confident we are!

99.3% Pass Rate
Total Cost: $194.97
Bundle Price: $149.98

Purchase Individually

  • exam =34
    Questions & Answers

    Questions & Answers

    1097 Questions

    $124.99
    exam =35
  • exam =37
    CISA Video Course

    Training Course

    74 Video Lectures

    $39.99
  • exam =36
    Study Guide

    Study Guide

    1141 PDF Pages

    $29.99

Isaca CISA Practice Test 14

Question 130

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a fraud model's findings are presented without confirming false-positive and false-negative behavior. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. Where should the audit team focus its principal finding?

  1. Faulty extraction logic or incomplete data can hide exceptions while giving false confidence in audit analytics.
  2. Inadequate engagement quality control can allow unsupported findings and repeat process weaknesses to persist.
  3. Audit conclusions may lack objectivity when independence is impaired by self-review, incentives or undisclosed conflicts.
  4. Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. Faulty extraction logic or incomplete data can hide exceptions while giving false confidence in audit analytics. The described exception is: a fraud model's findings are presented without confirming false-positive and false-negative behavior. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of freight tracking and fleet operations, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inadequate engagement quality control can allow unsupported findings and repeat process weaknesses to persist. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Audit conclusions may lack objectivity when independence is impaired by self-review, incentives or undisclosed conflicts. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

D:

Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

Question 131

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a fraud model's findings are presented without confirming false-positive and false-negative behavior. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. Which substantive or control test most directly addresses the observation?

  1. Reconcile input totals, inspect extraction and transformation logic, test boundary cases and independently reproduce selected exceptions.
  2. Inspect engagement review trails, methodology approvals, quality review outcomes and corrective actions for recurring defects.
  3. Walk through the process and classify each control by timing and action; test whether it prevents, detects or corrects the stated event.
  4. Compare the approved engagement letter, criteria, exclusions, procedures and deliverable wording to identify any overstatement of assurance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. Reconcile input totals, inspect extraction and transformation logic, test boundary cases and independently reproduce selected exceptions. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that a fraud model's findings are presented without confirming false-positive and false-negative behavior. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

C:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

Question 132

During an outsourced-services renewal at a logistics group, the IS auditor learns that a fraud model's findings are presented without confirming false-positive and false-negative behavior. The affected operation supports freight tracking and fleet operations. Delivery commitments and partner data flow through this process. What outcome would provide the STRONGEST evidence that the identified gap is resolved?

  1. A validated data lineage and repeatable queries yield matching totals and demonstrably detect seeded or known anomalies.
  2. Dated conflict declarations and independent reassignment or formally approved safeguards show the work was reviewed without the conflicted party.
  3. A risk-to-control map and observed test demonstrate the intended preventive gate, timely detection and accountable correction operate together.
  4. Independent workpaper review and tracked corrective measures show prior deficiencies were resolved and audit conclusions remain reproducible.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. A validated data lineage and repeatable queries yield matching totals and demonstrably detect seeded or known anomalies. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that a fraud model's findings are presented without confirming false-positive and false-negative behavior. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 133

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that a finding describes a symptom but does not state its business impact or cause. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. What control exposure MOST directly explains why this observation is significant?

  1. Biased or incomplete samples can produce unsupported conclusions about how a control operates across the actual population.
  2. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained.
  3. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations.
  4. Inadequate engagement quality control can allow unsupported findings and repeat process weaknesses to persist.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Correct. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations. The described exception is: a finding describes a symptom but does not state its business impact or cause. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of patient-care scheduling and claims processing, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Biased or incomplete samples can produce unsupported conclusions about how a control operates across the actual population. The definition of evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion is not established by this choice.

B:

Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained. This category is separate from evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Inadequate engagement quality control can allow unsupported findings and repeat process weaknesses to persist. The distinction tested is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not this concept.

Question 134

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that a finding describes a symptom but does not state its business impact or cause. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. Which evidence-gathering approach is MOST aligned with the recorded exposure?

  1. Inspect engagement review trails, methodology approvals, quality review outcomes and corrective actions for recurring defects.
  2. Reconcile the audit universe with risk assessments, incidents, regulatory changes and business impact, then evaluate documented prioritization.
  3. Verify the source population against independent totals, select a risk-appropriate sample and document the sampling method and deviations.
  4. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that a finding describes a symptom but does not state its business impact or cause. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

Question 135

During a routine controls assessment at a regional hospital, the IS auditor learns that a finding describes a symptom but does not state its business impact or cause. The affected operation supports patient-care scheduling and claims processing. Healthcare service continuity and protected records are at stake. Which evidence would BEST support a conclusion that the exposure has been addressed?

  1. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided.
  2. A finalized report presents evidenced findings, material limitations, accountable actions and timely escalation of unresolved high risks.
  3. Independent workpaper review and tracked corrective measures show prior deficiencies were resolved and audit conclusions remain reproducible.
  4. A reconciled population, reproducible selections and evaluated deviations support a conclusion limited to the population actually tested.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. A finalized report presents evidenced findings, material limitations, accountable actions and timely escalation of unresolved high risks. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that a finding describes a symptom but does not state its business impact or cause. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

D:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

Question 136

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that a critical control failure is buried among minor formatting observations. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. Which consequence would MOST directly follow if this weakness remains unresolved?

  1. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations.
  2. Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood.
  3. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained.
  4. Audit conclusions may lack objectivity when independence is impaired by self-review, incentives or undisclosed conflicts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations. The described exception is: a critical control failure is buried among minor formatting observations. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of merchant settlement and reconciliation, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Controls may not address the intended risk at the correct point because their preventive, detective or corrective roles are misunderstood. The evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion prerequisite remains unaddressed.

C:

Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Audit conclusions may lack objectivity when independence is impaired by self-review, incentives or undisclosed conflicts. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 137

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that a critical control failure is buried among minor formatting observations. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. Which audit procedure would provide the MOST DIRECT evidence about this control?

  1. Reconcile the audit universe with risk assessments, incidents, regulatory changes and business impact, then evaluate documented prioritization.
  2. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance.
  3. Inspect engagement declarations, prior responsibilities, incentive arrangements and independent review safeguards before relying on the audit opinion.
  4. Walk through the process and classify each control by timing and action; test whether it prevents, detects or corrects the stated event.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Correct. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that a critical control failure is buried among minor formatting observations. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

C:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

Question 138

During a payment-platform modernization at a payment clearing organization, the IS auditor learns that a critical control failure is buried among minor formatting observations. The affected operation supports merchant settlement and reconciliation. Finance and settlement integrity depend on this operation. Which follow-up result would BEST substantiate that the remediation operates effectively?

  1. A risk-to-control map and observed test demonstrate the intended preventive gate, timely detection and accountable correction operate together.
  2. Dated conflict declarations and independent reassignment or formally approved safeguards show the work was reviewed without the conflicted party.
  3. A corrected engagement scope and report explicitly distinguish tested controls, excluded services, limitations and the level of assurance provided.
  4. A finalized report presents evidenced findings, material limitations, accountable actions and timely escalation of unresolved high risks.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. A finalized report presents evidenced findings, material limitations, accountable actions and timely escalation of unresolved high risks. This is stronger than a manager's verbal assurance because it can be checked against the observed issue that a critical control failure is buried among minor formatting observations. The reviewer must verify the remediation period and scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. It changes a different feature than evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. That change would not implement evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

C:

Not the strongest closure evidence for this case. The configuration must instead establish evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

Question 139

During a regulatory readiness review at a municipal government, the IS auditor learns that management's response is reported as remediation without evidence of completion. The affected operation supports citizen service accounts and public records. Public accountability and essential service access are affected. Which weakness is MOST material to the control objective in this situation?

  1. Inadequate engagement quality control can allow unsupported findings and repeat process weaknesses to persist.
  2. Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported.
  3. Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained.
  4. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Correct. Decision makers may misjudge material exposure if reporting lacks supported facts, criteria, impact, agreed actions or limitations. The described exception is: management's response is reported as remediation without evidence of completion. This risk ties the observation to the business significance of citizen service accounts and public records, rather than treating management's claim as independent assurance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inadequate engagement quality control can allow unsupported findings and repeat process weaknesses to persist. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.

B:

Unmanaged scope, dependencies and evidence deadlines can leave significant objectives untested or conclusions unsupported. Acceptance here depends on observing evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion, not only that test.

C:

Stakeholders may rely on a conclusion that exceeds the engagement objectives, criteria or evidence actually obtained. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

Question 140

During a regulatory readiness review at a municipal government, the IS auditor learns that management's response is reported as remediation without evidence of completion. The affected operation supports citizen service accounts and public records. Public accountability and essential service access are affected. Which audit procedure would MOST directly validate the suspected control gap?

  1. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance.
  2. Inspect the audit work plan, scope approval, issue log, resources and milestone updates; trace deviations to revised procedures.
  3. Inspect engagement review trails, methodology approvals, quality review outcomes and corrective actions for recurring defects.
  4. Reconcile the audit universe with risk assessments, incidents, regulatory changes and business impact, then evaluate documented prioritization.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Correct. Trace findings to workpapers and confirm severity, root cause, business impact, management responses, ownership and communication to governance. The procedure directly tests the reported condition that management's response is reported as remediation without evidence of completion. A defensible IS audit conclusion requires relevant and reliable evidence from the actual control population and period.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. It does not establish the requested evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion outcome.

C:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. The relevant success criterion is evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion; this measures a different function.

D:

Not the most direct fieldwork procedure for these facts. That result could pass without demonstrating evidence appropriate to the audit conclusion.