Question 330
At Engineering Tower, 5-GHz-capable clients remain on congested 2.4 GHz even where 5 GHz is strong. Which ongoing safeguard best limits the specific risk after rollout?
Explanation
Correct Answer
For Engineering Tower, the decisive mechanism is Band steering under load. Band steering can guide dual-band association but depends on real RF and client support. Allow documented compatibility cases instead of forcing a universal band cutoff is an enduring limitation on the operational risk, not simply a one-time passing test.
Incorrect Answers
This is relevant to DSCP trust boundary, where qoS trust boundaries determine which received packet markings affect forwarding priority In the Engineering Tower case, A precaution for another failure mode is not the enduring boundary needed here. The specific mechanism is band steering can guide dual-band association but depends on real RF and client support
This is relevant to WMM access categories, where 802.11e WMM prioritizes wireless contention via different access categories In the Engineering Tower case, A precaution for another failure mode is not the enduring boundary needed here. The specific mechanism is band steering can guide dual-band association but depends on real RF and client support
This is relevant to Strict priority queue use, where priority scheduling affects service latency but requires careful queue sizing In the Engineering Tower case, A precaution for another failure mode is not the enduring boundary needed here. The specific mechanism is band steering can guide dual-band association but depends on real RF and client support