Question 200
During a root-cause review, the team reports: A team measures 'answer correctness' with a golden-answer comparator but its evaluation data includes only user questions. What evidence best identifies the reason?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Correct. A correctness comparison often needs an expected answer; other judges such as format or safety can operate without a reference. In the given situation — A team measures 'answer correctness' with a golden-answer comparator but its evaluation data includes only user questions. — the targeted diagnose action is: Inspect each judge's required inputs, reference fields, rubric and expected failure behavior. It inspects the stage or constraint most likely to explain the observed failure before changing the system.
Incorrect Answers
Not the strongest diagnose choice for this specific question. Inspect task-appropriate quality metrics, inference cost, p95 latency and error segments. This action primarily relates to Model selection from quantitative task metrics: Select candidate LLMs by measured task success, latency, safety and token cost, not parameter count or leaderboard rank. However, the described case — A team measures 'answer correctness' with a golden-answer comparator but its evaluation data includes only user questions. — is testing Ground-truth requirement for correctness versus reference-free judges. It does not directly establish the diagnose outcome or constraint that the question requires; it may still be useful in a different stage or incident.
Not the strongest diagnose choice for this specific question. Inspect logging configuration, sampling policy, trace privacy, missing identifiers and audit destinations. This action primarily relates to Inference logging and production trace privacy: Inference logs and tracing permit diagnosis of real issues but must be sampled, retained and redacted safely. However, the described case — A team measures 'answer correctness' with a golden-answer comparator but its evaluation data includes only user questions. — is testing Ground-truth requirement for correctness versus reference-free judges. It does not directly establish the diagnose outcome or constraint that the question requires; it may still be useful in a different stage or incident.
Not the strongest diagnose choice for this specific question. Inspect token volumes, QPS, endpoint pricing, cache hit rate and user/workload attribution. This action primarily relates to Databricks usage and token cost controls: Reduce LLM spend through token budgets, caching, smaller appropriate models and AI Gateway quotas while preserving acceptance quality. However, the described case — A team measures 'answer correctness' with a golden-answer comparator but its evaluation data includes only user questions. — is testing Ground-truth requirement for correctness versus reference-free judges. It does not directly establish the diagnose outcome or constraint that the question requires; it may still be useful in a different stage or incident.