The LSAT has long been considered one of the most challenging and nuanced standardized tests in the world of graduate admissions. For decades, the Analytical Reasoning section, colloquially known as “logic games,” stood as a rite of passage for law school hopefuls. It was often regarded as the most difficult yet most “learnable” part of the exam—one that, with enough practice, students could conquer. However, beginning in August 2024, a new chapter begins. The LSAT will no longer include this section. Instead, it will be replaced with a second Logical Reasoning section. This change isn’t just cosmetic. It represents a fundamental rethinking of what the LSAT is evaluating and how.
Removing Analytical Reasoning from the LSAT is not a random decision. It follows a series of legal and pedagogical discussions about fairness, accessibility, and relevance. Many have argued that the games section was too far removed from the actual skills needed in law school and disproportionately benefited students with access to expensive prep courses. Others recognized its value in developing deductive reasoning. Regardless of where one stood in that debate, the LSAC has made its decision. Now, prospective law students must adapt to a testing format that leans more heavily on abstract logic, critical reading, and argument dissection.
This restructured LSAT places a magnifying glass over logical reasoning—testing, retesting, and drilling the way students understand and break down arguments. It is less about building diagrams and solving puzzles, and more about analyzing fallacies, spotting assumptions, evaluating conclusions, and interpreting intent. For those preparing to take the LSAT after August 2024, this demands not only a change in study content but a fundamental shift in how one thinks about logic and reasoning itself. It is no longer about diagrams and conditional chains—it is about dissecting language and thought patterns.
Two Logical Reasoning Sections: What This Means for Your Strategy
With the Analytical Reasoning section gone, Logical Reasoning now plays a central role in LSAT performance. Previously, Logical Reasoning constituted only about a third of the overall exam. Now, with two scored Logical Reasoning sections, its weight in scoring and preparation has effectively doubled. For students, this means the margin for error has grown slimmer. You can no longer lean on strong performance in logic games to compensate for a weaker understanding of argument structure. Precision, consistency, and endurance in Logical Reasoning have never been more vital.
Logical Reasoning is not just about answering questions correctly; it’s about thinking like a lawyer. Each question is a mini argument—sometimes clear and concise, other times buried under confusing rhetoric and red herrings. Understanding how to untangle these arguments requires a deep grasp of logic, language, and mental discipline. The new format asks test-takers to do this not just once, but twice—possibly with minimal rest between sections. This raises the bar in terms of stamina and mental agility.
There’s also a psychological shift to contend with. In the past, students who enjoyed puzzles or were strong in visual-spatial reasoning often looked forward to the logic games section as a scoring opportunity. Now, they must channel that same analytical energy into mastering Logical Reasoning. The key difference is that while logic games had a structured framework—rules, diagrams, scenarios—Logical Reasoning questions are more unpredictable. They deal with real-world arguments, flawed reasoning, authorial tone, and subtle distinctions. One must train not only in logic but also in linguistic precision.
It’s essential, therefore, to develop new techniques to approach the added Logical Reasoning section. Success will depend on a student’s ability to categorize question types quickly, identify trap answers with confidence, and refine their timing to perfection. Blind review practices, error logs, and granular tracking of performance on each question type—assumption, strengthen, weaken, flaw, inference—will be more important than ever. Every missed question should be seen as a window into the mind’s current blind spots.
Reimagining Your Study Plan: Targeted Prep in the Age of LSAT Reform
With the new format now live, preparing for the LSAT demands a far more intentional study strategy than ever before. Gone are the days of spending weeks diagramming grouping games or memorizing the structure of game boards. Students now need to dive deep into the nuances of logical reasoning and reading comprehension. They must embrace new resources that mirror the August 2024 and beyond test format—resources that emphasize layered arguments, linguistic precision, and the ability to make subtle distinctions between answer choices that all seem plausible.
One of the first steps in constructing a modern LSAT study plan is choosing materials that align with the current format. The LSAC has acknowledged the format transition by releasing practice tests starting from PrepTest 101 onward. These newer tests exclude the logic games section entirely and focus instead on the twin pillars of Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. Students preparing for this new version of the test should prioritize these materials when building their prep schedules. Using outdated tests may still offer general reading or logical practice, but they will not accurately reflect the structure or pacing of the new exam.
Moreover, the LSAC’s LawHub platform has evolved to meet these new demands. It provides full-length digital tests, real-time diagnostic feedback, and a suite of instructional videos from legal education experts. LawHub’s interface mimics the real test-day experience, allowing students to grow comfortable with digital formatting, navigation, and pacing tools. This matters immensely because success on the LSAT is often as much about mastering the interface as mastering the questions.
Private prep companies have also begun to roll out updated curriculum modules that reflect the LSAT’s new architecture. From in-person bootcamps to interactive online courses, these offerings are tailored to help students sharpen their ability to evaluate arguments under pressure. Whether you’re a self-studier relying on textbooks and forums or a course-goer benefiting from structured lesson plans, your prep must now be centered on Logical Reasoning mastery. Learning how to read actively, to listen to an argument’s core before reacting emotionally to its content, and to evaluate each answer choice with surgical precision—these are the skills that will carry students through the August 2024 LSAT and beyond.
Deep Preparation, Emotional Clarity, and the LawHub Advantage
Beyond mastering the sections and understanding the updated format, students must prepare mentally and emotionally for the LSAT. Test anxiety, burnout, and performance dips under pressure are all real obstacles, particularly with the higher demands placed on Logical Reasoning skills. A full-length LSAT exam is not only a test of knowledge but of psychological endurance. You must maintain unwavering focus through back-to-back sections that test not only your comprehension but your resilience.
This is where the LSAC LawHub platform becomes more than a study resource—it becomes a psychological tool. By practicing in an environment that simulates the real test interface, students begin to build muscle memory, reducing the likelihood of technical surprises on test day. Familiarity with the digital tools—highlighting, flagging questions, navigating between passages—is critical. The fewer disruptions a student experiences due to interface confusion, the more mental energy they can preserve for analytical reasoning.
LawHub also offers free resources for those with financial need. These tools democratize access to quality preparation, helping level the playing field for students who may not have the means to invest in commercial prep. From free test bundles to digital tutorials and structured learning tracks, LawHub’s emphasis on accessibility echoes LSAC’s broader commitment to equity and fairness in legal education.
For those aiming for top law schools, where high LSAT scores are non-negotiable, it’s vital to develop a long-term study schedule that builds in room for reflection, recalibration, and strategic growth. That means not just completing practice tests, but reviewing them deeply. Why did you miss that assumption question? What pattern of error are you repeating across flaw questions? What pacing challenges emerge in section two? These reflections must drive your prep forward, creating a feedback loop that sharpens both intuition and intellect.
Ultimately, preparing for the LSAT in the post-logic-games era is about more than cramming for a test. It’s about becoming a better thinker—more precise, more patient, and more capable of seeing through rhetorical clutter. Law school requires a high level of sustained reasoning, and the LSAT, in its new form, is designed to test exactly that. By embracing the new format, understanding the tools available through LawHub, and refining your cognitive approach to arguments, you don’t just increase your chances of a high score. You begin the process of becoming a compelling and rigorous legal thinker.
Embracing the Power of Realism: Why Simulated Exams Matter More Than Ever
In the world of high-stakes testing, preparation is everything—but not all preparation is created equal. To truly be ready for the LSAT, a student must engage in practice that mirrors the intensity, format, and pressure of the real exam. That’s where LSAC’s LawHub practice tests step in as an unparalleled resource. For decades, students cobbled together preparation strategies from a mix of third-party test prep books, online forums, and sometimes outdated materials. While these resources had value, they often lacked the precise fidelity needed to truly simulate what happens on test day.
LSAC’s LawHub practice tests offer something more refined: the chance to rehearse the test within the very environment it will be delivered. This immersive digital platform mirrors the actual test interface used for the official LSAT, allowing students to familiarize themselves with not only the content but the logistics—how to navigate from question to question, how to flag items for review, how to pace themselves through each section with the built-in timer ticking away at the corner of the screen. These nuances matter. Anxiety doesn’t just come from content unfamiliarity—it often arises from the unknown mechanics of the testing process. By using LawHub, students reduce that uncertainty, building muscle memory and confidence with each practice session.
What truly elevates the value of LawHub’s practice exams is the authenticity of the content. These aren’t approximations of LSAT questions; they are actual released questions from previous administrations, restructured into the new post-August 2024 format. Every passage, every logical flaw, every reading comprehension trap has been designed by the same test makers who will be crafting future exams. The psychological benefit of practicing on genuine content cannot be overstated. It allows students to develop a sixth sense for patterns, phrasing, and question traps, forging a more intuitive, responsive test-taking mindset.
As LSAC pivots away from the logic games section and ushers in a double-dose of Logical Reasoning, these practice exams will become the new gold standard. They do not merely ask you to study harder—they compel you to study smarter. They invite you into the rhythm of the test so that, on exam day, you are not confronting the unfamiliar. You are executing a plan you’ve already rehearsed a dozen times over.
Reconfiguring the Blueprint: The Impact of the New LSAT Structure
The evolution of the LSAT format starting August 2024 represents more than a shuffled deck of sections—it reflects a philosophical shift in what the LSAT is measuring. With the removal of the Analytical Reasoning section, the Logical Reasoning segment now stands at the forefront. The new LSAT features two scored Logical Reasoning sections, one scored Reading Comprehension section, and one unscored variable section. This adjustment demands that students elevate their Logical Reasoning prep to a level that was previously only expected of top scorers.
Understanding the weight of Logical Reasoning is critical. It now accounts for over half of the scored content on the test. The skills required to perform well here are precise and challenging—students must identify assumptions, detect fallacies, evaluate arguments, and interpret evidence. These are not surface-level skills. They require hours of deliberate practice, careful reflection, and the ability to engage deeply with arguments that are often crafted with deliberate ambiguity.
LawHub’s new practice tests have been redesigned to reflect this change in focus. While the nature of the individual questions has not shifted dramatically—the same logical fallacies, inference patterns, and question types remain—the increased frequency of Logical Reasoning questions makes every mistake more costly. Students must learn not just to get questions right, but to get them right quickly and with certainty. There is no room for extended pondering or second-guessing every response. Precision under pressure is the skill that LawHub trains you to master.
For students who began studying under the previous format, this shift can feel destabilizing. Many dedicated hours to mastering logic games, learning how to diagram conditional statements and juggle rule-based scenarios. But LSAC has been conscientious in its approach to change. Alongside the new practice tests, it has released a detailed reference guide for those transitioning from old prep strategies to the new test format. This guide enables students to repurpose old materials effectively, showing how to supplement previous prep with focused practice on Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension.
Instead of starting over, students are encouraged to reorient their attention. That shift requires more than just altering the number of practice questions—they must change the way they think. The emphasis is now on argumentation, precision, and reading for logic rather than reading for structure. LawHub’s practice tests serve as a crucible in which these new habits are forged. By repeatedly engaging with this updated format, students gradually develop the mental endurance and logical clarity that the new LSAT demands.
A Bridge Between Past and Present: Navigating Mixed Preparation Resources
The transition to the new LSAT format has created a unique moment in the test preparation timeline—one in which two generations of practice resources coexist. There are still dozens of valuable PrepTests that reflect the old format, including logic games, which now represent a bygone LSAT era. For students who began their preparation with these older tests, a question arises: how should these resources be used now? Are they obsolete? Or can they still provide insight and utility?
The answer is layered. While the Analytical Reasoning sections in those older tests may no longer be directly relevant, the Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension sections remain goldmines of preparation value. Logical reasoning question types have remained largely consistent across decades of LSAT administration. Therefore, reviewing older tests can still build crucial skills. However, students must be strategic. This is where LSAC’s reference guide becomes indispensable. It helps test-takers understand how to realign their study plans, prioritize what still matters, and avoid wasting time on content that won’t appear on their actual test.
LSAC’s dual offering—legacy PrepTests and the new digital-first series beginning with test number 101—creates a bridge from the past to the present. This dual resource system benefits a diverse pool of students. Those just starting out can focus exclusively on the updated materials, while others in the midst of preparation can blend old and new. This flexibility honors the time and effort students have already invested, while still encouraging them to pivot toward the demands of the new format.
The digital platform also introduces enhanced analytics for those enrolled in LawHub Advantage. This premium tier gives students access to performance diagnostics, enabling them to identify patterns of error, track pacing, and evaluate progress across multiple test administrations. These tools allow for data-driven study—sharpening focus on the most problematic question types and measuring incremental improvements. The fusion of modern analytics with authentic content makes LawHub not just a test simulator but a personalized learning engine.
Precision, Endurance, and Mindset: The Deeper Lessons of LawHub Practice
For all the discussion about sections, scoring, and structural changes, what ultimately determines LSAT success is mindset. Preparing for the LSAT is not simply about acquiring knowledge. It is about sculpting a mind capable of nuanced thought, able to withstand three hours of sustained intellectual intensity, and clear enough to make decisions under pressure. LawHub’s practice tests help cultivate this mindset by providing repeated exposure to the actual testing experience. They allow students to sit with the discomfort of difficulty, to wrestle with confusion, and to grow resilient through repetition.
Practicing with LawHub’s tests reveals more than just content gaps. It exposes mental habits. Are you panicking when you don’t immediately understand a passage? Are you rushing through answer choices because of time anxiety? Are you second-guessing correct answers out of fear? These are not content issues—they are cognitive habits, and they can be reshaped. Every practice test is a mirror that reflects not only your intellectual strengths but your psychological tendencies. The more tests you take, the more self-aware you become.
Perhaps the most underrated value of these practice exams lies in their ability to teach endurance. The LSAT is long. It is emotionally draining. Without sufficient full-length practice, many students arrive at test day well-prepared in content but mentally unready for the marathon. LawHub makes it easy to simulate that experience. It encourages students to take full-length exams in a single sitting, replicating the pacing, structure, and pressure of the real test. This discipline pays dividends—not just in scoring higher, but in walking into the test center (or logging into the remote exam portal) with calm confidence.
Students who master the LawHub platform are not just practicing to pass. They are rehearsing how to remain poised under pressure, how to navigate moments of uncertainty, and how to stay focused when fatigue sets in. These are the deeper skills of LSAT mastery—the ones that separate competent scorers from top performers. In this way, LawHub becomes more than a tool. It becomes a training ground for intellectual composure, logical refinement, and psychological strength.
The Shift from Logic Games to Argument Analysis: A Redefined Challenge
For years, students preparing for the LSAT treated the Analytical Reasoning section—commonly called logic games—as a strategic battleground. It was the one area of the test where diligent practice could reliably yield improvement, where diagramming skills and memorized patterns could turn a once-daunting section into a point-scoring asset. With the August 2024 test, that dynamic changes entirely. The LSAC’s decision to remove logic games transforms the very DNA of the LSAT, signaling a new era of legal reasoning assessment. Now, test-takers must channel their efforts into mastering the art of logical argumentation.
The removal of logic games doesn’t just take away a familiar section; it takes away the comfort of visual logic. Students who once relied on drawing symbols, mapping out groups, and diagramming rules must now pivot to a world of abstract language, dense reasoning, and verbal logic. Logical Reasoning—already a core component of the LSAT—will now constitute two scored sections, accounting for a majority of a student’s total score. This shift demands a recalibration of study habits and a rethinking of the strategies that once provided balance and variety in test prep.
The challenge here is not only intellectual but psychological. Many students found solace in the logic games section because it offered a break from reading-heavy tasks. It was tactile, visual, and for some, even fun. Its removal means the LSAT becomes more linguistically intense and more reliant on cognitive stamina. Every section will now demand close reading, critical reasoning, and mental agility. Students who adapt to this reality early will find themselves ahead of the curve.
The emphasis on Logical Reasoning means students must sharpen their ability to detect flawed reasoning, spot hidden assumptions, dissect complex arguments, and distinguish between closely worded answer choices. This is no small task. The difficulty curve of Logical Reasoning increases with each additional question you face under timed conditions. As the test grows more verbally saturated, attention to nuance becomes paramount. The key is no longer about cracking puzzles—it’s about seeing through the fog of language to uncover the architecture of arguments.
Building a Strategy Around Logical Reasoning Mastery
With Logical Reasoning now playing a more dominant role, students must take a more strategic and layered approach to their preparation. Success in this section is not just about familiarity with question types—it’s about cultivating a mindset of precise skepticism. This means looking at every argument with an analytical eye, asking what the author is really claiming, and probing whether that claim logically follows from the evidence provided.
Studying Logical Reasoning requires more than just drilling questions. It demands a deeper understanding of the reasoning structures that underlie each item. One must learn to identify premises and conclusions within seconds. One must train the mind to spot assumptions—both stated and unstated—and evaluate whether additional evidence would strengthen or weaken the argument. Over time, the student must build an internal catalog of logical flaws: circular reasoning, equivocation, ad hominem attacks, false dilemmas. These concepts are no longer just test terms—they become the tools of interpretation, the scalpel for dissecting the logic of each passage.
But there’s another, subtler aspect to preparing for Logical Reasoning success: timing. Two full Logical Reasoning sections mean double the time pressure, and even the strongest students will falter if they cannot pace themselves properly. Each question demands attention, but not all deserve equal amounts of time. The art of triage becomes essential. Students must learn to identify easier questions quickly, answer them confidently, and save precious seconds for the more complex or ambiguous ones. Practice here is everything, but it must be the right kind of practice—timed, reviewed, and critically analyzed for patterns of error.
One of the most valuable techniques students can use is blind review. This process involves completing Logical Reasoning sections under timed conditions, then revisiting every question without time pressure and justifying each answer choice in writing. It’s during this review phase that real growth happens. Students learn not just whether they got a question right or wrong, but why. They begin to understand their thinking patterns—the traps they fall for, the answer choices they hesitate over, the assumptions they unconsciously make. Over time, this practice doesn’t just improve scores. It changes how students think.
Navigating the Role of the Variable Section in a High-Stakes Test
While the three scored sections of the LSAT—two Logical Reasoning and one Reading Comprehension—determine a student’s official results, there is another critical component to the test that should not be overlooked: the unscored Variable section. Though this section does not impact the final score, its inclusion on test day affects everything from pacing to psychological endurance. The Variable section serves a vital function for LSAC, as it allows them to field test new questions for use on future exams. But for students, it adds a layer of ambiguity and intensity to an already demanding experience.
The Variable section could mimic any of the three scored sections, making it indistinguishable during the actual exam. You might be facing a third Logical Reasoning section, or a second Reading Comprehension section—and you will not know which one is experimental. This uncertainty adds pressure. Students must treat every section as if it counts, which means sustaining full focus for every passage, every question, and every answer choice. There is no shortcut here. A moment of relaxed attention during what turns out to be a scored section can have serious consequences.
There is another reason why students must take the Variable section seriously. It serves as a real-time test of stamina and pacing. Completing four rigorous sections under timed conditions simulates the full psychological and physical toll of the actual LSAT. Preparing with practice tests that include a mock Variable section helps students build the endurance needed to maintain high performance across all sections. LawHub’s full-length digital practice exams are ideal for this, as they include a variable section in their simulated tests, providing a realistic and comprehensive preparation experience.
Students who incorporate full-length test simulations into their prep schedule develop a critical edge. They learn how to push through mental fatigue, how to refocus after difficult sections, and how to maintain composure when the stakes feel overwhelming. These are not just test-taking skills—they are the seeds of legal discipline, planted in the garden of academic preparation. The Variable section is not a distraction. It is a gift, an invitation to rise above complacency and prepare for the LSAT in its totality.
A Future-Proof Toolkit: Leveraging Free Resources from Khan Academy and LawHub
For students navigating the transition to the new LSAT format, the question of where to begin can feel paralyzing. Fortunately, LSAC’s partnership with Khan Academy provides a powerful and accessible entry point for LSAT preparation. This collaboration offers a wealth of free resources, including instructional videos, practice sets, quizzes, and strategy guides—all designed to align with the updated LSAT structure. It’s not just content—it’s a curriculum, tailored to reflect how modern students learn and how the LSAT is now constructed.
Khan Academy’s strength lies in its simplicity. It breaks down complex LSAT concepts into digestible lessons, allowing students to progress at their own pace. Whether you are just starting your preparation or shifting gears to adapt to the August 2024 changes, these lessons provide a framework for logical reasoning mastery, reading comprehension development, and test-day readiness. The interactive nature of the platform makes it particularly useful for self-studiers, while its adaptive feedback allows for more targeted practice.
On the other hand, LSAC’s LawHub offers the closest experience to the actual test environment. The two platforms together form a holistic toolkit for test-takers: Khan Academy teaches the skills, and LawHub provides the testing environment to apply them. When used together, they reinforce each other. A student might learn about necessary assumptions in a Khan Academy lesson and then encounter multiple related questions in a LawHub practice test. The repetition across platforms strengthens retention and builds intuitive reasoning.
This fusion of instruction and simulation is critical in an age where test prep can often feel fragmented. Students bombarded with videos, study schedules, and commercial courses often struggle to connect their learning to test-day performance. But the Khan Academy–LawHub ecosystem solves this by grounding preparation in actual LSAT questions, evaluated through interactive tools that track progress and adapt to student performance. This is test prep for the digital age—accessible, responsive, and rooted in realism.
The most remarkable thing about these resources is that they are free. In a landscape where commercial prep can cost thousands, the availability of zero-cost tools removes a major barrier for many aspiring law students. It democratizes access to elite preparation and reinforces the LSAC’s commitment to fairness and opportunity. No matter your background or financial means, these tools offer a path to excellence. What remains is your willingness to walk that path with discipline, curiosity, and self-belief.
More Than Just Tests: How LawHub Becomes a Full-Fledged LSAT Ecosystem
Preparing for the LSAT is not simply about taking practice tests. While those tests form the backbone of a strong preparation strategy, true readiness is built on more than repetition. It is constructed through layered understanding, exposure to multiple learning formats, and reflection that transforms knowledge into skill. LSAC’s LawHub platform reflects this philosophy. It is not a static library of questions—it is an evolving ecosystem, offering a dynamic range of resources that prepare students to approach the LSAT with clarity, adaptability, and self-trust.
What sets LawHub apart is its conscious embrace of different learning modalities. The platform doesn’t just assume all students learn best from drilling questions. It understands that some learners need visual explanations. Others need verbal narratives. Some thrive on structure; others prefer exploration. LawHub accommodates this diversity by offering a spectrum of study tools—videos, sample problems, breakdowns, guided walkthroughs, and full-length exams—creating a multi-sensory learning environment that echoes the real-world complexity of law school itself.
In essence, LawHub becomes not just a preparatory tool but a preparation philosophy. It reflects a shift from passive memorization to active engagement. From isolated practice to contextual mastery. Students are encouraged to not just answer questions, but to understand the systems beneath those questions. What is an assumption? Why does this argument weaken under scrutiny? What does a wrong answer teach me about my interpretive habits? This ecosystemic approach enables students to move from raw exposure to refined understanding—something no practice test alone can provide.
The introduces a more logic-intensive format that requires not just practice but depth. LawHub meets this moment by inviting students to explore content in layers—practice, analysis, reflection, reapplication. In doing so, it becomes more than a study platform. It becomes a mentor, quietly pushing students toward growth with each page turned and each concept revisited.
Choosing Your Learning Style: Videos, Articles, and Interactive Sets
Every student approaches the LSAT with a different learning profile. Some are highly visual, relying on conceptual diagrams or watching others work through problems to internalize logic. Others are linguistic learners who prefer to read through explanations, annotate arguments, and draw insights from prose. Still others are kinesthetic, grasping ideas best by solving problems interactively, learning from tactile engagement with material. LawHub, in its robust architecture, acknowledges this variance and adapts accordingly.
For the visually inclined, LawHub includes a collection of instructional videos that cover core LSAT concepts. These are not generic overviews—they walk through specific Logical Reasoning question types, demonstrate how to eliminate wrong answers systematically, and show how to extract structure from Reading Comprehension passages. Watching a skilled instructor think aloud while solving a question builds familiarity with mental models that are otherwise hard to articulate. Students begin to internalize the cadence of LSAT thinking—what to prioritize, what to ignore, how to pace one’s breath between choices.
For learners who find power in the written word, LawHub’s articles and guides dive deep into the philosophy and framework behind each section. These are not superficial “tips and tricks” but detailed analyses of argument structures, common pitfalls, and interpretive strategies. A student who reads these articles isn’t just learning the test—they’re learning how to think in a legal mindset. They start to observe the difference between reasoning and rhetoric, between fact and assumption. These are the distinctions that shape not only test scores but future legal careers.
And for the problem-solvers who learn best through trial and error, LawHub offers sample problem sets and adaptive quizzes. These tools provide immediate feedback, allowing students to refine their approach in real time. Each misstep becomes a moment of learning rather than a source of discouragement. The iterative nature of these problem sets encourages persistence—trying again, shifting perspective, narrowing focus. In a world that often prizes quick answers, this patient unraveling of understanding becomes a radical and empowering act.
LawHub’s design is not accidental—it is deliberate scaffolding. It allows students to first encounter an idea, then engage with it, then master it in application. By meeting students where they are, it nurtures their transformation not just into test-takers, but into thinkers.
The Khan Academy Integration: Free Access to World-Class LSAT Instruction
One of the most significant developments in LSAT preparation has been LSAC’s partnership with Khan Academy. This collaboration merges two educational powerhouses—one focused on legal testing, the other on free, accessible learning. Together, they provide a resource that levels the playing field for thousands of students, especially those for whom expensive commercial prep is simply not an option. With the inclusion of Khan Academy LSAT materials on LawHub, a full, structured, and intuitive course becomes available at no cost to all learners.
Khan Academy’s LSAT curriculum is built around the core competencies of the test. It begins by assessing your baseline knowledge, then personalizes a learning plan to address your weaknesses and build upon your strengths. This adaptive approach reflects a central truth about LSAT preparation: it is not a one-size-fits-all journey. Some students may excel in assumption questions but struggle with flaw identification. Others may read slowly but think critically. Khan Academy’s platform adapts in response, guiding each user along a path that is tailored, efficient, and responsive.
What makes this resource so impactful is not just its breadth but its accessibility. The platform is intuitive and designed to eliminate cognitive friction. Lessons are broken down into manageable segments, with clear objectives and immediate feedback. Instructional videos reinforce concepts, while practice questions hone skills through direct application. Progress tracking and achievement milestones add a layer of motivation that sustains long-term engagement.
By March, a new suite of Khan Academy resources tailored to the updated August 2024 LSAT structure became available, with the full library set to remain accessible through June 30. This timeline gives students a generous runway to prepare in a focused and strategic way. It allows learners to sync their Khan Academy study plans with LawHub’s official practice tests, creating a holistic preparation rhythm—learn, apply, review, repeat.
The message behind this initiative is simple but revolutionary: elite LSAT preparation should not be a privilege reserved for the few. It should be a right accessible to all who are willing to work for it. The integration of Khan Academy into LawHub brings this vision to life, allowing students from all backgrounds to walk into the August LSAT with the same tools, the same strategies, and the same potential for success.
LawHub Advantage: Going Deeper with Premium LSAT Preparation
For students seeking the most comprehensive preparation experience, LawHub Advantage offers an elite upgrade. This premium subscription provides access to 54 full-length, official LSAT practice tests—an unparalleled archive of questions, answers, and explanations that spans the evolution of the test. In the context of the August 2024 changes, this treasure trove becomes even more valuable, offering a wide lens through which students can trace argument structures, question patterns, and logic trends over time.
While not every test in the archive matches the new format, the Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension sections from these exams remain timeless in their design. They reflect the cognitive challenge at the heart of the LSAT: to think clearly under pressure. To read actively, reason precisely, and choose wisely. Students who work through this archive will not only sharpen their skills—they will build test-day resilience. They will have seen every twist, every curveball, every trick in the LSAT playbook. Nothing will surprise them. And that psychological calm is worth its weight in points.
LawHub Advantage also includes interactive features that allow students to simulate the digital LSAT experience exactly as it will occur on test day. Tools such as highlighting, flagging, and section navigation match the interface used in the official exam. By repeatedly practicing under these conditions, students develop confidence and comfort with the digital medium. This eliminates one of the hidden stressors of the LSAT—technological uncertainty.
But LawHub Advantage goes beyond content and interface. It offers a space for deep reflection. Through performance analytics, students can track their scores over time, identify consistent error types, and target their weakest areas with surgical precision. This transforms preparation from a guessing game into a data-informed journey. It’s not about doing more questions—it’s about doing the right questions, with the right focus, at the right time.
As the August 2024 LSAT approaches, LawHub Advantage becomes the ultimate toolkit for those committed to excellence. It represents a high point in test preparation—a convergence of authenticity, technology, and pedagogy. It empowers students not just to prepare, but to evolve. Not just to take the test, but to master it.
Conclusion
The August 2024 LSAT represents not just a change in structure but a transformation in mindset. With the retirement of the logic games section and the rise of dual Logical Reasoning sections, the LSAT is aligning more closely with the kind of analytical, argument-based thinking that defines success in law school and the legal profession. For students, this means that preparation must be more intentional, more reflective, and more attuned to how one thinks, reasons, and solves problems under pressure.
LSAC’s LawHub platform, bolstered by its integration with Khan Academy and expanded through the LawHub Advantage subscription, offers a preparation environment unlike any seen in past LSAT cycles. It’s not just about quantity of practice—it’s about quality of thought. Students now have access to not only full-length, officially formatted exams, but also instructional videos, interactive problem sets, guided walkthroughs, and adaptive learning tools that speak to different learning styles and cognitive strengths.
Success on the LSAT in this new era is no longer reserved for those who can afford elite tutoring. It is available to anyone with the discipline to engage deeply, the curiosity to understand how arguments work, and the perseverance to practice with honesty and self-awareness. Whether you’re watching a Khan Academy video late at night, completing a LawHub diagnostic on a weekend, or reviewing your Logical Reasoning error log for the third time, every step brings you closer to mastery.