Qlik Sense vs Power BI: Evaluating Features, Pricing, and Use Cases

Power BI Qlik Sense

In today’s fast-moving business environment, the ability to transform raw data into actionable insights has become a necessity. Organizations are constantly seeking tools that allow them to monitor performance, identify trends, and make decisions based on real-time data. Business Intelligence (BI) tools offer these capabilities by enabling users to analyze data, create reports, and share insights throughout the organization.

Among the many BI tools available, Qlik Sense and Power BI stand out as two of the most widely used platforms. Each brings a unique approach to data analysis and visualization. Understanding how these tools work, where they shine, and what limitations they might have is essential for making an informed decision about which one suits your organization’s needs.

This article explores these tools in detail, beginning with an overview of their basic concepts, their core features, and how they support collaboration, data preparation, visualization, and mobile accessibility.

Understanding Qlik Sense and Power BI

Qlik Sense is a self-service data analytics platform developed by Qlik. It allows users to create personalized reports and dashboards through drag-and-drop features and interactive elements. A key strength of Qlik Sense is its associative data engine, which enables users to freely explore data from any angle. Unlike traditional query-based systems, Qlik Sense dynamically associates all data fields, revealing patterns and connections that may otherwise go unnoticed.

Power BI, developed by Microsoft, offers a business analytics solution that allows users to visualize data and share insights across their organization. It integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Excel, Azure, and other Microsoft services, making it a practical choice for companies already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem. Power BI supports connections to hundreds of data sources and offers features such as real-time dashboards, natural language queries, and custom visualizations.

Though both tools aim to provide comprehensive analytics solutions, they are structured differently and serve slightly different user bases. Qlik Sense leans more toward data discovery and flexible exploration, while Power BI focuses on streamlined integration and advanced reporting features.

Collaboration Capabilities

Effective collaboration is essential when working with data, especially for teams that rely on shared insights to drive strategic decisions. Qlik Sense and Power BI both offer collaboration features, but their methods differ.

Qlik Sense allows users to collaborate in real time. Multiple users can access and work on the same dashboard or report simultaneously. This shared environment encourages communication and reduces the time it takes to finalize reports or visualizations. Additionally, Qlik Sense supports annotations, storytelling features, and easy sharing of dashboards with various stakeholders.

Power BI integrates closely with Microsoft Teams, making collaboration intuitive for organizations already using Microsoft Office tools. Users can embed reports directly into Teams channels, allowing for easy discussion and review. Although Power BI does not support real-time co-authoring like Qlik Sense, its integration with a broader collaboration suite compensates for this limitation.

Both tools make it easy to publish reports and dashboards for wider access. Permissions and access controls are customizable in each platform, ensuring that sensitive data remains secure while teams can still benefit from shared insights.

Data Preparation and Transformation

Data preparation is often one of the most time-consuming aspects of data analysis. This phase involves cleaning, transforming, and modeling data before it can be effectively used in dashboards and reports. Both Qlik Sense and Power BI offer robust capabilities in this area, though their strengths vary.

Qlik Sense provides a user-friendly interface for data preparation. Its data manager and data load editor allow users to connect to a wide range of data sources, from spreadsheets and databases to cloud services and APIs. Users can transform data using built-in functions without the need for advanced coding. The associative engine automatically links related data fields, minimizing the effort needed to build relationships manually.

Power BI uses a tool called Power Query for data transformation. It enables users to apply a series of transformations—such as filtering rows, merging tables, and creating calculated columns—through a step-by-step interface. Power BI also supports DAX (Data Analysis Expressions), a formula language used for advanced data modeling and calculations. For users comfortable with Excel functions, DAX will feel familiar and powerful.

While Qlik Sense is known for its intuitive exploration and reduced reliance on predefined models, Power BI offers more control and complexity through its structured data modeling. The choice between them depends on whether your organization values flexibility or control during the data preparation stage.

Visualization Capabilities

Data visualization is the cornerstone of business intelligence, and both Qlik Sense and Power BI excel in this area. However, their design philosophies and customization options differ.

Qlik Sense emphasizes ease of use and interactivity. Users can create charts, graphs, maps, and tables using drag-and-drop features. The visual interface is designed for exploration, allowing users to click on data points and instantly see related information. This associative experience enables users to make connections between data elements quickly, even if they are not explicitly related in a traditional schema.

Power BI offers a wide range of visualization options, including custom visuals from a marketplace. It also allows for detailed customization, such as adjusting colors, labels, axes, and more. For users who need to adhere to specific branding guidelines or who require detailed layout control, Power BI’s customization features are a significant advantage.

Both tools support drill-down features, interactive filtering, and dynamic visuals that respond to user inputs. Dashboards can be tailored for specific audiences, whether for high-level executives or hands-on analysts. The key difference lies in Qlik Sense’s emphasis on dynamic exploration versus Power BI’s structured customization.

Mobile Accessibility

In the age of remote work and mobile-first strategies, having access to data analytics tools on mobile devices is a growing priority. Qlik Sense and Power BI both offer mobile applications that extend the user experience beyond the desktop.

Qlik Sense has a responsive design that automatically adjusts visualizations for different screen sizes. Its mobile app allows users to interact with dashboards, make selections, and explore data just as they would on a desktop. The interface is smooth, and touch gestures are optimized for mobile devices, providing a seamless experience.

Power BI also offers a mobile app for iOS and Android devices. It provides interactive dashboards, real-time alerts, and the ability to annotate and share reports directly from the app. While the experience is generally positive, some users may find the mobile layout less flexible compared to Qlik Sense, especially when it comes to responsiveness and layout optimization.

For organizations with mobile-first users or field teams needing real-time insights, Qlik Sense may offer a slightly better user experience. However, Power BI’s integration with other Microsoft mobile apps and cloud services adds its own set of advantages.

Integration and Ecosystem

The ability to integrate with other tools and platforms plays a vital role in the utility of any BI solution. Both Qlik Sense and Power BI offer extensive integration capabilities but cater to different ecosystems.

Qlik Sense is vendor-agnostic and integrates with a broad array of third-party applications, data warehouses, and cloud services. This flexibility makes it suitable for organizations with diverse tech stacks or those using a mix of on-premises and cloud-based systems.

Power BI is deeply embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem. It works seamlessly with Excel, Azure, SharePoint, Dynamics 365, and other Microsoft applications. For organizations already using these tools, Power BI represents a natural extension of their existing infrastructure.

APIs and developer tools are available for both platforms, allowing for the creation of custom extensions, connectors, and automated workflows. While Qlik Sense emphasizes open integration, Power BI offers tight native integration within a specific ecosystem.

User Learning Curve and Experience

The ease with which users can adopt and begin using a BI tool greatly impacts the return on investment. If a tool is too complex, adoption rates may be low, regardless of its features.

Qlik Sense is designed with a user-friendly interface that appeals to both beginners and experienced analysts. Its guided workflows, interactive visualizations, and contextual menus make it accessible to users without a technical background. Training is still required, but users often find they can become productive quickly.

Power BI also offers an intuitive interface, particularly for users familiar with Excel. However, its use of DAX and more complex data modeling can create a steeper learning curve for beginners. Experienced users, especially those with a background in Microsoft tools, often find Power BI to be highly efficient and powerful.

The learning experience can vary significantly depending on the user’s prior exposure to BI tools and data modeling concepts. Organizations with less technical staff might lean toward Qlik Sense for ease of use, while those with dedicated analysts and technical resources may prefer Power BI for its depth and control.

Scalability and Performance

As organizations grow and handle more data, the scalability and performance of their BI tools become crucial. Both Qlik Sense and Power BI are built to handle large datasets, but they manage scalability in different ways.

Qlik Sense uses an in-memory data processing engine that loads data into RAM for fast querying and response times. This approach is effective for medium to large datasets and enables real-time interaction without performance degradation. However, it can become resource-intensive on extremely large datasets unless optimized properly.

Power BI leverages cloud computing resources through Power BI Service and Azure integration. Its performance scales effectively with the use of cloud-based data models and services like Azure Synapse. Power BI Premium users can also deploy dataflows and paginated reports that are designed for high-volume enterprise scenarios.

For companies with large-scale data environments or those seeking cloud-native solutions, Power BI may offer more scalability through its cloud services. On the other hand, Qlik Sense provides strong performance for interactive, in-memory data exploration.

Qlik Sense and Power BI are both powerful tools, each with unique strengths that cater to different organizational needs. Qlik Sense excels in flexible exploration, real-time collaboration, and mobile responsiveness. It is particularly well-suited for organizations that value intuitive interfaces and ad hoc analysis.

Power BI offers strong integration with Microsoft products, deep customization, and scalable cloud-based performance. It is ideal for companies heavily invested in the Microsoft ecosystem or those requiring advanced data modeling capabilities.

Ultimately, the decision between Qlik Sense and Power BI depends on factors like existing technology infrastructure, user expertise, budget, and specific business goals. Taking time to evaluate these areas can help organizations select the most appropriate tool to unlock the full potential of their data.

Comparative Evaluation Based on Industry Standards

When selecting a business intelligence solution, many organizations look to industry-standard evaluations such as those provided by Gartner and other research firms. These assessments often rank tools based on two critical aspects: ability to execute and completeness of vision. Qlik Sense and Power BI both consistently appear in these evaluations, often in the Leaders quadrant, but their strengths vary.

Qlik Sense is frequently praised for its stable and proven performance. Its associative engine, self-service analytics, and scalability for mid-sized deployments are often highlighted. The platform’s development roadmap is steady, emphasizing core capabilities like data discovery and flexible reporting.

Power BI, on the other hand, receives recognition for its aggressive pace of innovation. Microsoft regularly updates the platform with new features, integrations, and usability enhancements. Its commitment to accessibility and embedded AI functions also adds to its appeal. The tool’s rapid development cycle, combined with its wide user base, contributes to its dynamic growth trajectory.

In industry evaluations, Qlik Sense tends to score higher in reliability and consistent delivery of core analytics. Power BI leads in areas related to extensibility, integration, and advanced features. Organizations must decide whether they prefer a mature, reliable platform or one that evolves quickly and offers bleeding-edge features.

Real-World Use Cases and Organizational Fit

Understanding where and how each tool is used in real-world scenarios can also guide the selection process. Different organizations have varying levels of technical maturity, data complexity, and user requirements.

Qlik Sense is commonly adopted in industries like healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. These sectors value the ability to explore data interactively and make quick decisions without building complex models. For instance, in healthcare, a hospital may use Qlik Sense to monitor patient wait times, optimize staffing, and identify patterns in admission rates. The platform’s associative engine allows users to navigate the data from multiple angles without the need for a rigid schema.

Power BI is widely used in finance, education, and enterprise-level IT environments. Its strength lies in integrating multiple systems and building standardized, repeatable reports for corporate-level KPIs. For example, a financial services firm may use Power BI to consolidate data from accounting systems, CRM platforms, and market feeds to create detailed financial dashboards. The ability to define and manage data relationships precisely makes Power BI a strong choice in such contexts.

The size and structure of an organization also matter. Qlik Sense is well-suited for departments or teams that need flexibility and fast data access. Power BI scales more naturally across entire enterprises, especially those already using Microsoft 365 tools.

Comparing Qlik Sense, Tableau, and Power BI

To provide a broader perspective, it’s helpful to compare Qlik Sense and Power BI with another leading BI platform: Tableau. Each tool has carved out a niche in the BI market, and understanding their relative strengths helps in making an informed decision.

Qlik Sense offers a unique associative data model that allows users to freely explore data without the limitations of predefined hierarchies. This capability is especially useful in environments where users may not know in advance what questions they need answered.

Tableau is known for its powerful data visualization capabilities and ease of creating visually compelling dashboards. It emphasizes storytelling and aesthetics, making it a favorite among data analysts and designers. However, Tableau generally requires users to create structured data models before analysis, which can be a limitation in certain use cases.

Power BI combines strong visualization with enterprise-ready features like governance, role-based access, and integration with other Microsoft services. It offers a balanced approach between flexibility and structure, making it appealing to both business users and IT departments.

Organizations must consider the nature of their data and the skill levels of their users. Qlik Sense is best when intuitive exploration is key. Tableau is ideal for high-end visual storytelling. Power BI is suited for integrated environments needing controlled scalability.

Pricing Considerations and Total Cost of Ownership

The cost of a BI tool goes beyond just the monthly or annual licensing fees. Total cost of ownership includes factors like training, maintenance, support, hardware (if on-premises), and the time needed for adoption and deployment.

Qlik Sense offers tiered pricing for business and enterprise customers. Its business plan is designed for small to mid-sized teams and includes basic reporting and data analysis features. The enterprise plan adds features such as governance, advanced security, and large-scale deployment options.

Power BI’s pricing is highly competitive, with the Pro version available at a relatively low monthly cost per user. The Premium version includes advanced features like paginated reports, AI capabilities, and large-scale deployments. This version is priced annually and is ideal for organizations with high-volume data and multiple user groups.

While Power BI seems more affordable, it’s important to consider hidden costs. For example, Power BI users may need licenses for other Microsoft tools. On the other hand, Qlik Sense may incur higher upfront costs but can reduce long-term data preparation time due to its associative model.

Another consideration is user adoption. A more intuitive tool may require less training and have faster ROI, even if it costs more initially. Organizations should assess not just software cost, but the entire implementation lifecycle.

Flexibility and Customization

Different organizations have different workflows, branding standards, and reporting requirements. The ability to customize BI tools to match these needs is critical.

Qlik Sense offers moderate customization in terms of dashboards, charts, and user interaction. While not as extensive as some other platforms, it allows developers to create custom extensions and visualizations using JavaScript and APIs.

Power BI excels in customization. Users can choose from a large gallery of visuals, fine-tune dashboard elements, and write DAX formulas for complex calculations. Reports can be branded to meet corporate design guidelines, and administrators can control access at granular levels.

For organizations with in-house development teams or those needing highly personalized visuals, Power BI may provide more freedom. Qlik Sense, meanwhile, balances ease of use with sufficient flexibility to meet most standard business needs.

Data Governance and Security

Data governance ensures that the right people have the right access to the right data. It includes roles, permissions, data lineage, and audit trails.

Qlik Sense provides robust governance capabilities, especially in its enterprise version. Administrators can define user roles, control access to specific datasets, and monitor usage. Qlik’s centralized data catalog and lineage tools help organizations maintain control over their data landscape.

Power BI also includes strong governance tools, particularly when integrated with Azure Active Directory. It supports role-level security, data classification, and data loss prevention policies. Power BI Service provides centralized management and compliance monitoring.

For highly regulated industries such as finance or healthcare, these features are crucial. Power BI’s alignment with Microsoft security frameworks may be beneficial for organizations already using Microsoft 365 security protocols.

AI and Advanced Analytics

Modern BI platforms are incorporating AI features to automate insights, suggest visualizations, and even predict future trends.

Qlik Sense includes augmented analytics, which suggest relevant insights based on data patterns. Its Insight Advisor uses natural language processing (NLP) to answer user queries and recommend visualizations. Users can type questions in plain language and receive visual answers instantly.

Power BI offers similar capabilities through AI-powered visuals, smart narratives, and integration with Azure Machine Learning. Users can build models, run forecasts, and embed AI-driven visuals into their dashboards. Power BI also supports natural language querying via the Q&A feature.

Both tools help democratize analytics by enabling non-technical users to engage with data meaningfully. However, Power BI’s integration with Microsoft AI services may give it an edge in enterprise environments seeking advanced analytics capabilities.

User Community and Support

The strength of a BI tool’s user community can impact how quickly problems are resolved and how easily new users can learn the platform.

Qlik has a strong community of users, developers, and partners. Its support resources include forums, documentation, tutorials, and certifications. QlikWorld and other events offer opportunities to learn and network.

Power BI benefits from Microsoft’s extensive global community. There are thousands of blogs, YouTube tutorials, forums, and user groups dedicated to Power BI. Microsoft’s official learning portal also provides structured learning paths and certifications.

The availability of support and community resources can reduce training costs and increase adoption rates. Both platforms score well here, though Power BI’s massive user base may make it easier to find quick answers and expert assistance.

Comparing Qlik Sense and Power BI across various dimensions reveals that both are powerful, versatile tools suited for different types of users and organizations. Qlik Sense offers intuitive exploration, a collaborative environment, and an associative data engine that promotes data discovery. It excels in scenarios where users need freedom to explore data dynamically.

Power BI shines in integration, advanced modeling, pricing, and enterprise scalability. It’s especially advantageous for organizations embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem, offering a smooth learning curve for Excel users and powerful customization features.

Rather than seeking a one-size-fits-all solution, organizations should align their BI tool choice with their data strategy, user skill level, existing infrastructure, and growth plans. Conducting a thorough internal assessment and even piloting both tools can provide deeper insight into which platform will bring the most value in the long run.

Choosing the Right Business Intelligence Tool for Your Organization

The final step in evaluating Qlik Sense and Power BI involves aligning their strengths with your organization’s priorities. Whether your team is focused on flexibility, rapid adoption, advanced modeling, or budget efficiency, understanding the practical implications of each platform helps you select the right tool for sustained success.

While both platforms offer powerful data analytics features, the right choice often depends on your company’s data culture, technological ecosystem, and the nature of the insights you want to generate. Some businesses may even find value in deploying both tools for different departments, especially if one caters to exploratory needs and the other to structured enterprise reporting.

Below, we break down how to assess the right fit based on organizational goals, technical requirements, user expectations, and long-term adaptability.

Aligning Tool Features With Organizational Goals

Different industries and departments within an organization have varying needs. For example, a marketing team may prioritize data visualization and ease of use, while a finance team may seek advanced modeling capabilities and structured reporting. Aligning these priorities with what Qlik Sense and Power BI offer is crucial.

Organizations aiming for rapid, on-the-fly data exploration and self-service analytics typically benefit from Qlik Sense. Its associative engine supports unstructured navigation, ideal for discovering insights without needing predefined queries. This capability is especially helpful in dynamic industries like retail or logistics, where users often ask new questions of the data daily.

On the other hand, Power BI is better suited to structured, repeatable reporting environments. For businesses requiring deep integration with Microsoft tools, maintaining consistency across departments, or managing large-scale datasets with strict security protocols, Power BI offers a more comprehensive solution.

Define your organization’s primary BI goals—whether real-time decision-making, historical trend analysis, or centralized data governance—and choose the platform that aligns most closely with those goals.

Evaluating Technical Infrastructure and Integration

Technical compatibility plays a huge role in the long-term viability of a BI solution. It’s important to consider how well the BI platform integrates with your existing tech stack, data warehouses, and cloud environments.

Qlik Sense is well-known for its open architecture and integration with a wide array of third-party platforms. It can connect with both cloud and on-premises data sources and is particularly valuable for organizations using mixed environments. Its API ecosystem supports custom extensions and seamless integration with various enterprise systems.

Power BI, however, offers unmatched synergy with Microsoft technologies. Organizations using tools like Azure Synapse, Dynamics 365, Excel, or SharePoint will find Power BI offers plug-and-play compatibility. This reduces integration costs and simplifies workflows across the enterprise. Additionally, Power BI supports Azure Active Directory and Microsoft Information Protection, adding layers of built-in security and access control.

Before choosing a tool, evaluate your current software systems and identify any necessary integrations. If you are heavily invested in Microsoft infrastructure, Power BI may be the natural choice. For organizations using diverse platforms, Qlik Sense provides more flexible integration options.

Assessing User Profiles and Training Needs

Another essential factor is the technical proficiency of the end users. A tool that is too complex may hinder adoption, while one that is too basic might fall short of business needs.

Qlik Sense’s visual, associative interface is ideal for business users and analysts who want to explore data without writing code or building data models. The learning curve is relatively smooth, especially for users unfamiliar with structured query languages or scripting. It is designed to promote curiosity and exploration.

Power BI, while user-friendly for Excel veterans, requires some technical knowledge for advanced use. Its formula language (DAX) and structured modeling can initially be a barrier to entry for non-technical users. However, with proper training, Power BI becomes a very powerful tool in the hands of experienced analysts and IT teams.

To determine the best fit, assess the roles and skill levels of your intended users. If widespread, self-service adoption across departments is a priority, Qlik Sense may be more effective. If your organization can support a centralized data team or has technical users comfortable with modeling and scripting, Power BI offers deeper control and customization.

Scalability and Performance Over Time

As your business grows, so will your data and your analytical needs. Scalability should be a core consideration when selecting a BI tool.

Qlik Sense handles moderate data volumes efficiently through in-memory computing and works well for ad hoc analysis and small-to-mid-scale deployments. With proper optimization, it can also scale for larger enterprises, especially in hybrid or private cloud environments.

Power BI is built with cloud scalability in mind. Its integration with Azure allows it to handle large datasets, complex data pipelines, and enterprise-grade reporting. The Premium tier includes capabilities for massive deployments, AI features, and dataflows to process millions of records. It is suitable for multinational enterprises managing large data infrastructures.

If your business anticipates rapid growth or handles vast amounts of structured data across departments, Power BI might be a better long-term solution. For organizations focused on departmental agility and fast insights, Qlik Sense offers sufficient performance and flexibility.

Support Ecosystem and Community Strength

A robust support ecosystem can ease the transition to a new BI tool and reduce the long-term costs associated with training, troubleshooting, and feature expansion.

Qlik offers a dedicated support team, an extensive partner network, and regular training events. Its community forums are active, with discussions ranging from basic tutorials to advanced development techniques. QlikWorld and other annual events give users a platform to share innovations and best practices.

Power BI benefits from Microsoft’s vast global network and resources. It features one of the largest online communities in the BI space, with regular webinars, tutorials, user groups, and certifications. The depth and accessibility of Power BI support content can significantly speed up learning and problem-solving for new users.

When assessing support, consider the availability of in-house expertise, the importance of external resources, and the potential benefits of a large user community. Organizations that value peer support and frequent product updates may find Power BI’s ecosystem more compelling.

Flexibility for Custom Development

Customization allows organizations to tailor a BI solution to their exact needs. Both Qlik Sense and Power BI offer extensibility, but in different ways.

Qlik Sense provides flexibility through its open APIs. Developers can build custom visualizations, extensions, and connectors. This is valuable for organizations with unique data workflows or branding requirements. The tool also supports mashups—custom applications that combine Qlik analytics with other web elements.

Power BI offers a wide array of customization options as well, particularly through DAX, R, and Python integration. Developers can create custom visuals, configure complex data transformations, and automate reporting workflows. Power BI’s integration with Azure services also enables machine learning, big data processing, and more.

If your organization has the development resources to leverage these capabilities, either tool can be tailored extensively. The decision depends on your preferred development environment and the skillsets of your technical team.

Managing Data Governance and Compliance

For industries dealing with sensitive information, compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX is critical. Ensuring that a BI platform offers adequate governance and compliance features is non-negotiable.

Qlik Sense includes built-in governance capabilities such as user access control, data lineage, and centralized management. It provides auditing tools to track data usage and ensure that data policies are followed consistently across departments.

Power BI offers enterprise-grade compliance and integrates with Microsoft’s security ecosystem. With support for role-based access, activity logging, encryption, and audit trails, it meets the needs of highly regulated industries. Power BI Premium further enhances compliance capabilities, allowing for isolated storage and processing environments.

Organizations with complex compliance requirements will benefit from evaluating how each platform supports data privacy, retention policies, and external audits.

Cost Optimization and ROI

Cost is often a deciding factor in tool selection, but it’s important to look beyond licensing fees. Consider training time, development effort, deployment speed, and long-term maintenance when estimating total cost of ownership.

Qlik Sense requires a higher initial investment, especially for enterprise deployments. However, its intuitive interface and rapid report creation may reduce the time and cost of training and development. It’s a cost-effective choice for organizations looking for fast insights with fewer technical hurdles.

Power BI is known for its affordable pricing. The Pro license is low-cost and supports most small-to-mid-sized use cases. For larger businesses, the Premium license enables advanced functionality and unlimited data models. Since Power BI integrates with many Microsoft services already in use, there may be fewer additional expenses.

Analyze the total investment needed for each tool in your specific environment and consider factors like ease of adoption, customization needs, and support costs to calculate ROI effectively.

Final Recommendations

Both Qlik Sense and Power BI offer comprehensive business intelligence solutions, but they serve slightly different purposes and user bases. Rather than seeking a one-size-fits-all answer, organizations should evaluate their current needs, future goals, and technical environment.

Choose Qlik Sense if your priorities include:

  • Intuitive, self-service data exploration
  • Ad hoc analytics across loosely structured datasets
  • Collaborative dashboards with real-time interactivity
  • Independence from any specific vendor ecosystem

Choose Power BI if your organization requires:

  • Integration with Microsoft tools and services
  • Scalable enterprise-level reporting and governance
  • Advanced data modeling with DAX and AI features
  • Low entry cost with widespread support resources

In some cases, organizations may benefit from using both tools in parallel. For example, Qlik Sense could serve business users who need exploratory capabilities, while Power BI provides structured reporting for executives and compliance teams.

Ultimately, the best BI tool is the one that aligns with your team’s skills, your company’s infrastructure, and your strategic goals. With a careful evaluation and possibly even pilot testing, you can ensure a successful BI deployment that delivers insights, enhances collaboration, and drives better business outcomes.